1
   

It's Only About Winning

 
 
Reply Tue 24 Jun, 2008 06:44 am
Townhall.com::It's Only About Winning::By David Limbaugh
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 2,083 • Replies: 21
No top replies

 
Sabz5150
 
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Jun, 2008 08:29 am
@DiversityDriven,
Not only a conservative biased website (Townhall), but... (and this is GREAT!!!) from a Limbaugh!

Naah, no slant there. None whatsoever. This is your definition of "objective"?
Reagaknight
 
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Jun, 2008 08:21 pm
@Sabz5150,
Sabz5150;58063 wrote:
Not only a conservative biased website (Townhall), but... (and this is GREAT!!!) from a Limbaugh!

Naah, no slant there. None whatsoever. This is your definition of "objective"?


Has he advertised it as something other than an op-ed piece?
DiversityDriven
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Jun, 2008 06:39 am
@Sabz5150,
Sabz5150;58063 wrote:
Not only a conservative biased website (Townhall), but... (and this is GREAT!!!) from a Limbaugh!

Naah, no slant there. None whatsoever. This is your definition of "objective"?
You always use this type of thinking when you read? Do you apply the same thought process when applying fundamental science? Are you smart enough to know that every media source is biased, including yours, period.
Quote:
This is your definition of "objective"?[/[/QUOTE]Is this yours?
Sabz5150
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Jun, 2008 06:43 am
@Reagaknight,
Reagaknight;58070 wrote:
Has he advertised it as something other than an op-ed piece?


It was not advertised as anything. I merely pointed out that the hard right slant. I can do that, can't I?
Sabz5150
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Jun, 2008 06:50 am
@DiversityDriven,
DiversityDriven;58072 wrote:
You always use this type of thinking when you read?


Usually.

Quote:
Do you apply the same thought process when applying fundamental science?


Damn straight. Subjectivity must be eliminated.

Quote:
Are you smart enough to know that every media source is biased, including yours, period.


No doubt. That's why it's nice to grab from a mix of media sources. Everything you've posted has got that hard right slant to it. Hell, even *I* read/watch Fox here and there. They get it right sometimes.

But of course that's news. Your above piece is not. So I expected baseless attacks against Bam and wow... I was right! From a Limbaugh... a guy I hear daily, so I knew the train was coming long before I heard the horn.

Quote:
Is this yours?


Wonderful response.
0 Replies
 
DiversityDriven
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Jun, 2008 06:52 am
@DiversityDriven,
Quote:
but... (and this is GREAT!!!) from a Limbaugh!
Any one named Obama I should expect should be like B hussein huh. You must be blinding us with your fundy science again? Or do you have yourself convinced your objective?
DiversityDriven
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Jun, 2008 06:53 am
@Sabz5150,
Sabz5150;58073 wrote:
It was not advertised as anything. I merely pointed out that the hard right slant. I can do that, can't I?
Try talking about the context of the article.
Sabz5150
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Jun, 2008 07:14 am
@DiversityDriven,
DiversityDriven;58075 wrote:
Any one named Obama I should expect should be like B hussein huh. You must be blinding us with your fundy science again? Or do you have yourself convinced your objective?


Odd. You're trying to compare a US senator to an Iraqi dictator. I'm comparing a right wing commentator to his brother... a right wing commentator.

But keep trying, it's funny to see how low you will go.
Sabz5150
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Jun, 2008 07:15 am
@DiversityDriven,
DiversityDriven;58076 wrote:
Try talking about the context of the article.


Fine. It's pure opinion, nothing more.

How's that?
0 Replies
 
Reagaknight
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Jun, 2008 08:33 am
@Sabz5150,
Sabz5150;58073 wrote:
It was not advertised as anything. I merely pointed out that the hard right slant. I can do that, can't I?


"Hard right?" What, is Townhall.com fascist?
Sabz5150
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Jun, 2008 09:12 am
@Reagaknight,
Reagaknight;58080 wrote:
"Hard right?" What, is Townhall.com fascist?


Sure as hell isn't hard left liberal wingnut material. It bills itself as solid conservative (a 'clearinghouse' for conservative new media and activism), so you expect anything less than a hard right view?

C'mon... you aren't that naive. Anyone with Ann Coulter and Limbaugh's brother on the roll call is nothing but hard right slant.
DiversityDriven
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Jun, 2008 06:20 am
@Sabz5150,
Sabz5150;58078 wrote:
Odd. You're trying to compare a US senator to an Iraqi dictator. I'm comparing a right wing commentator to his brother... a right wing commentator.

But keep trying, it's funny to see how low you will go.
No i'm not trying to compare anyone, you are. How many people do you think answer to the name Hussein? I know B Hussein does.
Quote:
But keep trying, it's funny to see how low you will go.
I will go as low until you are knee high to an ant.
DiversityDriven
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Jun, 2008 06:32 am
@Sabz5150,
Sabz5150;58081 wrote:
Sure as hell isn't hard left liberal wingnut material. It bills itself as solid conservative (a 'clearinghouse' for conservative new media and activism), so you expect anything less than a hard right view?

C'mon... you aren't that naive. Anyone with Ann Coulter and Limbaugh's brother on the roll call is nothing but hard right slant.
Why would it be, to make you happy. Sorry not my job. As far as the source if you like you can google the title and read it from whom ever you like. Here let me help the young fundy. It's Only About Winning - Google Search
Sabz5150
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Jun, 2008 06:36 am
@DiversityDriven,
DiversityDriven;58086 wrote:
No i'm not trying to compare anyone, you are. How many people do you think answer to the name Hussein? I know B Hussein does.


Don't kid yourself. Seriously. You're acting like a child balancing on technicalities. A classic conservative!

Quote:
I will go as low until you are knee high to an ant.


Right. Again, don't kid yourself.
Sabz5150
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Jun, 2008 06:40 am
@DiversityDriven,
DiversityDriven;58088 wrote:
Why would it be, to make you happy. Sorry not my job. As far as the source if you like you can google the title and read it from whom ever you like. Here let me help the young fundy. It's Only About Winning - Google Search


Let's see your link...

Oh wow... It's Limbaugh's story! And again it's Limbaugh's story!

Not much of a difference there, now is it? You're trying to make the site pick up the slack for the story's slant?

Doesn't work that way.

As for 'fundy'... who believes in an invisible man? Awwwwwww still believe in Santa, too?
DiversityDriven
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Jun, 2008 06:44 am
@Sabz5150,
Sabz5150;58090 wrote:
Don't kid yourself. Seriously. You're acting like a child balancing on technicalities. A classic conservative!



Right. Again, don't kid yourself.
And you are a scientist right, LOL.
Quote:
Right. Again, don't kid yourself
Ohh, so you prefer uncle's!
DiversityDriven
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Jun, 2008 06:50 am
@Sabz5150,
Sabz5150;58091 wrote:
Let's see your link...

Oh wow... It's Limbaugh's story! And again it's Limbaugh's story!

Not much of a difference there, now is it? You're trying to make the site pick up the slack for the story's slant?

Doesn't work that way.

As for 'fundy'... who believes in an invisible man? Awwwwwww still believe in Santa, too?
You keep complaining about the media source, not me. Of course it limbaughs story, that is the thread topic, remember?
Quote:
Not much of a difference there, now is it? You're trying to make the site pick up the slack for the story's slant?

Doesn't work that way.
That's your opinion.
Quote:
As for 'fundy'... who believes in an invisible man?
Who believes in darwin?
Quote:
Awwwwwww still believe in Santa, too
About as much as Darwinism. But your a true believer arn't ya?
Sabz5150
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Jun, 2008 06:51 am
@DiversityDriven,
DiversityDriven;58093 wrote:
And you are a scientist right, LOL.


When did I ever say that?

Your cheap shots and poor attacks to justify your skewed view of this world simply don't work. I hate to tell you this... but your definitions of what is "fact" and "objective" are horribly wrong.

Horribly. Wrong.

Once again, you have to switch the argument to avoid the fact that your obvious bias has been shown for all to see.


Quote:
Ohh, so you prefer uncle's!


Did your brain pop its clutch? :wtf:
0 Replies
 
Sabz5150
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Jun, 2008 06:54 am
@DiversityDriven,
DiversityDriven;58096 wrote:
You keep complaining about the media source, not me.


That source happens to be Limbaugh's brother.

Quote:
Of course it limbaughs story, that is the thread topic, remember?


That's riiiiiiiiight, and because of that it should be taken as right wing commentary, nothing else.

Quote:
That's your opinion.


There's another word you use incorrectly.

Quote:
Who believes in darwin?


What's there to believe? He's a guy. So what? Your point?

Quote:
About as much as Darwinism. But your a true believer arn't ya?


"Darwinism"? What's that, an attempt to lower the bar so you can get over it?
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » It's Only About Winning
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 1.1 seconds on 12/26/2024 at 04:36:57