It's Only About Winning

Forums: Politics, Political, American Politics
Email this Topic • Print this Page

Townhall.com::It's Only About Winning::By David Limbaugh

The Washington Post reports that Sen. Barack Obama is aggressively trying to reintroduce himself to voters, echoing the spin of Obama's advisers that not everyone knows him yet. In reality, Obama's major campaign challenge will not be to reveal, but to conceal his true identity.

Obama is not trying to introduce himself to unreached voters, but is engaged in damage control with many he's already reached -- and insulted and disillusioned.

As long as he was soaring above the fray with the lofty rhetoric of hope, change and unity, Obama could masquerade as a quasi-messiah figure. But once forced into the nitty-gritty of contested issues and debates, his false visage began to crack. Those cracks expanded into campaign-threatening fissures when voters learned about Obama's sordid associations and left-wing elitist snobbery toward small-town America.

The Post says that in his reintroduction, Obama has "offered a clear road map for the kind of candidate he is likely to become ?: an ambitious gamer of the electoral map, a ruthless fundraiser and a scrupulous manager of his own biography in the face of persistent concerns about how he is perceived."

What the Post left out is that Obama has also shown himself to be an unscrupulous master of the politics of calculation and expedience. Whether on public finance, NAFTA, Iran, Iraq, Jerusalem, special interests, Cuba, illegal immigration or the decriminalization of marijuana, Obama has demonstrated a propensity for flip-flopping that could embarrass the grandmaster himself, Sen. John Kerry.

_______________________

Click for the rest.

Topic Stats
Top Replies
Link to this Topic

Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 2,406 • Replies: 21

No top replies

@DiversityDriven,

Not only a conservative biased website (Townhall), but... (and this is GREAT!!!) from a Limbaugh!

Naah, no slant there. None whatsoever. This is your definition of "objective"?

2 Replies

@Sabz5150,

Sabz5150;58063 wrote:

Not only a conservative biased website (Townhall), but... (and this is GREAT!!!) from a Limbaugh!

Naah, no slant there. None whatsoever. This is your definition of "objective"?

Has he advertised it as something other than an op-ed piece?

1 Reply

@Sabz5150,

Sabz5150;58063 wrote:

Not only a conservative biased website (Townhall), but... (and this is GREAT!!!) from a Limbaugh!

Naah, no slant there. None whatsoever. This is your definition of "objective"?

You always use this type of thinking when you read? Do you apply the same thought process when applying fundamental science? Are you smart enough to know that every media source is biased, including yours, period.

Quote:

This is your definition of "objective"?[/[/QUOTE]Is this yours?

1 Reply

@Reagaknight,

Reagaknight;58070 wrote:

Has he advertised it as something other than an op-ed piece?

It was not advertised as anything. I merely pointed out that the hard right slant. I can do that, can't I?

2 Replies

@DiversityDriven,

DiversityDriven;58072 wrote:

You always use this type of thinking when you read?

Usually.

Quote:

Do you apply the same thought process when applying fundamental science?

Damn straight. Subjectivity must be eliminated.

Quote:

Are you smart enough to know that every media source is biased, including yours, period.

No doubt. That's why it's nice to grab from a mix of media sources. Everything you've posted has got that hard right slant to it. Hell, even *I* read/watch Fox here and there. They get it right sometimes.

But of course that's news. Your above piece is not. So I expected baseless attacks against Bam and wow... I was right! From a Limbaugh... a guy I hear daily, so I knew the train was coming long before I heard the horn.

Quote:

Is this yours?

Wonderful response.

0 Replies

@DiversityDriven,

Quote:

but... (and this is GREAT!!!) from a Limbaugh!

Any one named Obama I should expect should be like B hussein huh. You must be blinding us with your fundy science again? Or do you have yourself convinced your objective?

1 Reply

@Sabz5150,

Sabz5150;58073 wrote:

It was not advertised as anything. I merely pointed out that the hard right slant. I can do that, can't I?

Try talking about the context of the article.

1 Reply

@DiversityDriven,

DiversityDriven;58075 wrote:

Any one named Obama I should expect should be like B hussein huh. You must be blinding us with your fundy science again? Or do you have yourself convinced your objective?

Odd. You're trying to compare a US senator to an Iraqi dictator. I'm comparing a right wing commentator to his brother... a right wing commentator.

But keep trying, it's funny to see how low you will go.

1 Reply

@DiversityDriven,

DiversityDriven;58076 wrote:

Try talking about the context of the article.

Fine. It's pure opinion, nothing more.

How's that?

0 Replies

@Sabz5150,

Sabz5150;58073 wrote:

It was not advertised as anything. I merely pointed out that the hard right slant. I can do that, can't I?

"Hard right?" What, is Townhall.com fascist?

1 Reply

@Reagaknight,

Reagaknight;58080 wrote:

"Hard right?" What, is Townhall.com fascist?

Sure as hell isn't hard left liberal wingnut material. It bills itself as solid conservative (a 'clearinghouse' for conservative new media and activism), so you expect anything less than a hard right view?

C'mon... you aren't that naive. Anyone with Ann Coulter and Limbaugh's brother on the roll call is nothing but hard right slant.

1 Reply

@Sabz5150,

Sabz5150;58078 wrote:

Odd. You're trying to compare a US senator to an Iraqi dictator. I'm comparing a right wing commentator to his brother... a right wing commentator.

But keep trying, it's funny to see how low you will go.

No i'm not trying to compare anyone, you are. How many people do you think answer to the name Hussein? I know B Hussein does.

Quote:

But keep trying, it's funny to see how low you will go.

I will go as low until you are knee high to an ant.

1 Reply

@Sabz5150,

Sabz5150;58081 wrote:

Sure as hell isn't hard left liberal wingnut material. It bills itself as solid conservative (a 'clearinghouse' for conservative new media and activism), so you expect anything less than a hard right view?

C'mon... you aren't that naive. Anyone with Ann Coulter and Limbaugh's brother on the roll call is nothing but hard right slant.

Why would it be, to make you happy. Sorry not my job. As far as the source if you like you can google the title and read it from whom ever you like. Here let me help the young fundy. It's Only About Winning - Google Search

1 Reply

@DiversityDriven,

DiversityDriven;58086 wrote:

No i'm not trying to compare anyone, you are. How many people do you think answer to the name Hussein? I know B Hussein does.

Don't kid yourself. Seriously. You're acting like a child balancing on technicalities. A classic conservative!

Quote:

I will go as low until you are knee high to an ant.

Right. Again, don't kid yourself.

1 Reply

@DiversityDriven,

DiversityDriven;58088 wrote:

Why would it be, to make you happy. Sorry not my job. As far as the source if you like you can google the title and read it from whom ever you like. Here let me help the young fundy. It's Only About Winning - Google Search

Let's see your link...

Oh wow... It's Limbaugh's story! And again it's Limbaugh's story!

Not much of a difference there, now is it? You're trying to make the site pick up the slack for the story's slant?

Doesn't work that way.

As for 'fundy'... who believes in an invisible man? Awwwwwww still believe in Santa, too?

1 Reply

@Sabz5150,

Sabz5150;58090 wrote:

Don't kid yourself. Seriously. You're acting like a child balancing on technicalities. A classic conservative!

Right. Again, don't kid yourself.

And you are a scientist right, LOL.

Quote:

Right. Again, don't kid yourself

Ohh, so you prefer uncle's!

1 Reply

@Sabz5150,

Sabz5150;58091 wrote:

Let's see your link...

Oh wow... It's Limbaugh's story! And again it's Limbaugh's story!

Not much of a difference there, now is it? You're trying to make the site pick up the slack for the story's slant?

Doesn't work that way.

As for 'fundy'... who believes in an invisible man? Awwwwwww still believe in Santa, too?

You keep complaining about the media source, not me. Of course it limbaughs story, that is the thread topic, remember?

Quote:

Not much of a difference there, now is it? You're trying to make the site pick up the slack for the story's slant?

Doesn't work that way.

That's your opinion.

Quote:

As for 'fundy'... who believes in an invisible man?

Who believes in darwin?

Quote:

Awwwwwww still believe in Santa, too

About as much as Darwinism. But your a true believer arn't ya?

1 Reply

@DiversityDriven,

DiversityDriven;58093 wrote:

And you are a scientist right, LOL.

When did I ever say that?

Your cheap shots and poor attacks to justify your skewed view of this world simply don't work. I hate to tell you this... but your definitions of what is "fact" and "objective" are horribly wrong.

Horribly. Wrong.

Once again, you have to switch the argument to avoid the fact that your obvious bias has been shown for all to see.

Quote:

Ohh, so you prefer uncle's!

Did your brain pop its clutch? :wtf:

0 Replies

@DiversityDriven,

DiversityDriven;58096 wrote:

You keep complaining about the media source, not me.

That source happens to be Limbaugh's brother.

Quote:

Of course it limbaughs story, that is the thread topic, remember?

That's riiiiiiiiight, and because of that it should be taken as right wing commentary, nothing else.

Quote:

That's your opinion.

There's another word you use incorrectly.

Quote:

Who believes in darwin?

What's there to believe? He's a guy. So what? Your point?

Quote:

About as much as Darwinism. But your a true believer arn't ya?

"Darwinism"? What's that, an attempt to lower the bar so you can get over it?

1 Reply

It's Only About Winning

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know