1
   

Just when you thought they were unbiased

 
 
Reply Mon 9 Jun, 2008 04:43 pm
CBS's Byron Pitts Concedes He's 'Excited' by Obama's Nomination --6/9/2008-- Media Research Center

CBS's Byron Pitts Concedes He's 'Excited'
by Obama's Nomination


On Sunday's Reliable Sources, Howard Kurtz played a clip of CBS reporter Byron Pitts on Wednesday's CBS Evening News hailing Barack Obama's Democratic nomination victory as proof "one of America's oldest and ugliest color lines has been broken, and there is a new bridge for a new generation," then proposed: "You obviously are paid to be an objective journalist, but some part of you must be excited that Barack Obama won this nomination." Pitts confirmed his excitement: "Well, certainly. I mean, as an African-American man, this is significant. I mean, look, for my entire life I've been able to, as a man, dream of doing great things. But a dream I could never have was being President of the United States. Now, for instance, my sons, my nephew, they can have that dream. And I think those kinds of images are important."

Pitts continued with a quip about getting a cab in Manhattan: "For instance, one reason why I'm a journalist today was because I saw Ed Bradley on television in the 1970s, and that told me that was possible. So I think -- I mean, look, the reality is it's still going to be hard for a black man to get a cab in New York. There is still going to be problems with race in this country. But having Barack Obama as the nominee is significant."

-------------------------------------


Click for the rest.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 830 • Replies: 5
No top replies

 
Fatal Freedoms
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Jun, 2008 04:50 pm
@DiversityDriven,
and Media research center (MRC) isn't exactly neutral either.
0 Replies
 
DiversityDriven
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Jun, 2008 04:57 pm
@DiversityDriven,
Where in what i posted did i say MRC was neutral? Try something different for a change, like disproving the content of the article? Try it, it won't hurt you.
Fatal Freedoms
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Jun, 2008 07:58 pm
@DiversityDriven,
DiversityDriven;57812 wrote:
Where in what i posted did i say MRC was neutral? Try something different for a change, like disproving the content of the article? Try it, it won't hurt you.


How can they accuse someone else of being biased when they are?
Sabz5150
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jun, 2008 05:14 am
@Fatal Freedoms,
Fatal_Freedoms;57830 wrote:
How can they accuse someone else of being biased when they are?


Exactly. It's like weighing something on two broken scales and taking the average.
0 Replies
 
scooby-doo cv
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jun, 2008 03:47 pm
@Fatal Freedoms,
Fatal_Freedoms;57830 wrote:
How can they accuse someone else of being biased when they are?


Very Happy You will only confuse him FF.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Just when you thought they were unbiased
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 09/27/2024 at 09:20:44