Saddam Pursued Nukes

Forums: Politics, Political, American Politics
Email this Topic • Print this Page

Saddam Pursued Nukes - Newsmax.com

Saddam Pursued Nukes

In seven months of secret debriefings, Saddam Hussein admitted that he faked having weapons of mass destruction but planned on developing a weapons of mass destruction program with nuclear capability within a year.

Saddam made the admissions in videotaped interviews with George L. Piro, an FBI agent who was assigned by the FBI with the CIA’s approval to try to develop his cooperation.

For my book "The Terrorist Watch: Inside the Desperate Race to the Next Attack" — being published this week — Piro described the debriefings, which have never been previously revealed.

The book is being excerpted exclusively in the December issue of Newsmax magazine.

“You’ve got to talk to George Piro,” John Miller, the assistant FBI director for public affairs, was telling me over lunch at Brasserie Les Halles in downtown Washington as we discussed plans for the book in August 2006. “That’ll be your best interview.”

Miller should know. Before taking the FBI job, he was an anchor for ABC’s "20/20," and he is one of the few journalists to have interviewed Osama bin Laden.

Topic Stats
Top Replies
Link to this Topic

Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 662 • Replies: 13

No top replies

@DurtySanches,

Saddam got what was coming to him, that old scumbag. He raised and groomed his sons to be sadists and mass murderers. He got to watch the UNITED STATES gun them down, like the criminals they were. FIGHT, TROOPS, FIGHT. Fight the Terror, and bring it down in flames and hot lead.

1 Reply

@DurtySanches,

DurtySanches;45262 wrote:

Saddam Pursued Nukes - Newsmax.com

if that was true it'd be all over the news...

the video tape was probably made by one of his hundreds of look-a-likes

1 Reply

@Fatal Freedoms,

Fatal_Freedoms;45365 wrote:

if that was true it'd be all over the news...

not really, success in Iraq is currently at a record high, deaths are at record lows... bad news is page one, good news is buried if mentioned

2 Replies

@Silverchild79,

Silverchild79;45371 wrote:

not really, success in Iraq is currently at a record high, deaths are at record lows... bad news is page one, good news is buried if mentioned

so when are the 160,000 troops coming home ?

0 Replies

@Pinochet73,

Pinochet73;45352 wrote:

Saddam got what was coming to him, that old scumbag. He raised and groomed his sons to be sadists and mass murderers. He got to watch the UNITED STATES gun them down, like the criminals they were. FIGHT, TROOPS, FIGHT. Fight the Terror, and bring it down in flames and hot lead.

why did rumsfield go to baghdad and shake his hand after the massacre of the kurds,and continue to arm and back him,when they knew exactly what he had done,they didnt give a **** about him commiting genocide on his people back then,so dont let anyone tell you the war in iraq,was about getting rid of a evil tyrant and bringing freedom to the iraqi people.

1 Reply

@Silverchild79,

Silverchild79;45371 wrote:

not really, success in Iraq is currently at a record high, deaths are at record lows... bad news is page one, good news is buried if mentioned

the good news is usually insignificant compared to the bad news. The goods things that do happen are like "Two US soldiers rescued a kitten from a local Iraqi building-top" or something to that affect...

0 Replies

@scooby-doo cv,

scooby-doo;45392 wrote:

why did rumsfield go to baghdad and shake his hand after the massacre of the kurds,and continue to arm and back him,when they knew exactly what he had done,they didnt give a **** about him commiting genocide on his people back then,so dont let anyone tell you the war in iraq,was about getting rid of a evil tyrant and bringing freedom to the iraqi people.

Why did Great Britain attack Saddam Hussein? Blair said the war was all about getting rid of a bloodthirsty tyrant. Why? Great Britain is hypocritical.:argue:

2 Replies

@Pinochet73,

Pinochet73;45415 wrote:

Why did Great Britain attack Saddam Hussein? Blair said the war was all about getting rid of a bloodthirsty tyrant. Why? Great Britain is hypocritical.:argue:

yeah and your point is!?? Bush said Iraq had WMDs but that wasn't true!

1 Reply

@Fatal Freedoms,

Fatal_Freedoms;45430 wrote:

yeah and your point is!?? Bush said Iraq had WMDs but that wasn't true!

So did Blair. Why? Why? Why are the British guilty of evil-doing in Iraq? Why?
:rollinglaugh:

1 Reply

@Pinochet73,

Pinochet73;45444 wrote:

So did Blair. Why? Why? Why are the British guilty of evil-doing in Iraq? Why?
:rollinglaugh:

Yeah because if blair says it, then it must be true :wtf:

1 Reply

@Fatal Freedoms,

Fatal_Freedoms;45447 wrote:

Yeah because if blair says it, then it must be true :wtf:

Why are the British killing Iraqis? Why? Why? Tell me why? THEY ARE KILLING IRAQIS IN BASRA. Why?:phat:

1 Reply

@Pinochet73,

:backtotopic:

0 Replies

@Pinochet73,

Pinochet73;45415 wrote:

Why did Great Britain attack Saddam Hussein? Blair said the war was all about getting rid of a bloodthirsty tyrant. Why? Great Britain is hypocritical.:argue:

Blair or Bliar as he is known here in the UK,said the war was about WMDs,it was not about him being a tyrant,that came into play later,when they coud not find those elusive WMDs,the main reason he is no longer PM.

0 Replies

Saddam Pursued Nukes

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know