1
   

The real truth about Ron Paul

 
 
Reply Thu 22 Nov, 2007 12:32 pm
Mona Charen on Ron Paul & 2008 on National Review Online =
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 685 • Replies: 9
No top replies

 
I Understand
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Nov, 2007 05:49 pm
@REDWHITEBLUE2,
this is not only completely false it is damn near slanderous.
Freeman15
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Nov, 2007 08:36 pm
@REDWHITEBLUE2,



The Paul campaign already debunked this idiotic hit-piece.

Quote:



The GOP hacks are trying so very hard to counter Paul's credibility it's almost sad.
92b16vx
 
  1  
Reply Fri 23 Nov, 2007 09:28 pm
@Freeman15,
Freeman15;46536 wrote:
The GOP hacks are trying so very hard to counter Paul's credibility it's almost sad.


As if they could. What's funny is EVERY hit piece that gets written turns into GOOD publicity for Ron Paul. Most are written in bigger blogs and publications, then when the rebut hits we get that much more exposure, and when the truth comes out people like what they hear.
0 Replies
 
Silverchild79
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Nov, 2007 02:00 am
@REDWHITEBLUE2,
waaaaaa, you were mean to Ron Paul!!!!

but as far as reality goes it's a pretty good post I'd say
92b16vx
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Nov, 2007 02:41 am
@Silverchild79,
Silverchild79;46589 wrote:
but as far as reality goes it's a pretty good post I'd say


Your knowledge of Ron Pauls positions, and his associations could fill a very small timble.
0 Replies
 
Silverchild79
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Nov, 2007 11:43 am
@I Understand,
I Understand;46532 wrote:
this is not only completely false it is damn near slanderous.


Slander is spoken, liable is written.
0 Replies
 
Curmudgeon
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Nov, 2007 11:58 am
@REDWHITEBLUE2,
Libel, not liable. Slander written is liable to be libel. ( I know, it's just the internet, who cares about spelling, grammar, and syntax?)

Perhaps Mona Charon should be charged with libel.
0 Replies
 
Silverchild79
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Nov, 2007 12:05 pm
@REDWHITEBLUE2,
hmm, spell check didn't catch it, I tried :-(
0 Replies
 
Curmudgeon
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Nov, 2007 12:21 pm
@REDWHITEBLUE2,
Spellcheck won't catch a misused word, except to correct its spelling.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » The real truth about Ron Paul
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 07/03/2024 at 09:18:14