1
   

Feds raid alternative currency headquarters

 
 
Reply Sun 18 Nov, 2007 04:29 pm
Feds raid Liberty Dollar Headquarters

Was this a legal raid, or did they have the right to produce this alternative currency? I have heard and read lots of conflicting stories.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 884 • Replies: 18
No top replies

 
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Nov, 2007 05:16 pm
@mommamia,
Smash AQ.
0 Replies
 
Drakej
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Nov, 2007 06:00 pm
@mommamia,
I do not understand what the problem is here. Casinos are allowed to mint there own currency, why is it such a problem that another group of people decided to make there own currency. Also Pino this has absolutely nothing to do with AQ in any way shape or form, so please go on to explain your point of view on this topic.
0 Replies
 
mommamia
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Nov, 2007 06:14 pm
@mommamia,
I can't see why it is wrong either, but am not a lawyer or anything and don't know much. Seems like theft to me, I thought I had the right to pay with whatever you would take.
Just recently I read a report about a guy who got into trouble with the IRS for paying his employees in gold coins. I am going to try and find the link.

I don't think Pino has an opinion.
0 Replies
 
Drakej
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Nov, 2007 06:24 pm
@mommamia,
Hell we would be better off if we went back to using coins made of precious metals. At least then we would know that the money we have in our possession is actually worth it.
0 Replies
 
mommamia
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Nov, 2007 06:58 pm
@mommamia,
source

This is crazy, if gold is legal tender, then why all these raids?
Why doesn't our government want us to have gold in our personal possesion? Why would they insist we use only dollars? I have serious problems with this.
0 Replies
 
Drakej
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 Nov, 2007 02:50 pm
@mommamia,
The reason why the feds are so pissed is because they dont like the fact that this guy used sound logic and reasoning to pay his employees in something that will always have value. Also the guys in charge of the raids probably did not understand the legality of his and his associates actions. They may have also expected the to just cop out and say "sorry we messed up" but they actually stood up for themselves and knew they where right.
Silverchild79
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 Nov, 2007 03:47 pm
@mommamia,
I don't see why it's a big deal if they wanted to make/sell them. People sell coins all the time, it's a good campaign idea too. But realistically you can't buy groceries from Walmart with them, it's not actually currency
0 Replies
 
briansol
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 Nov, 2007 03:57 pm
@Drakej,
Drakej;45913 wrote:
Hell we would be better off if we went back to using coins made of precious metals. At least then we would know that the money we have in our possession is actually worth it.


probably... but its simply not practical any more.

an ounce of silver is $14.xx right now.

a quarter has, by definition, a quarter ounce of 90% pure silver.

$.25x14 = way more than a quarter is worth.

so, it's either make the quarter the size of a pea, or screw with the amount of silver in each coin, thus making a quarter, no longer a quarter ounce.

it's this very reason that 1964 was the last year for circulating precious metal coins
0 Replies
 
Drakej
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 Nov, 2007 04:09 pm
@mommamia,
Ahhh I gotcha, I should have figured you would have the skinny B. Okay that makes sense, but still what got up the feds ass.
0 Replies
 
Silverchild79
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 Nov, 2007 04:15 pm
@mommamia,
yup, even if we went back to the gold and silver backed paper money you're just trusting that the government has the precious metal in fort knox and they aren't messing with it

trust the government with precious metals? I think not haha
0 Replies
 
rugonnacry
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 Nov, 2007 05:12 pm
@mommamia,
Cameron, that line "trust the government with precious metals" should have been followed with your kool-aide man
0 Replies
 
klyph
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 Nov, 2007 05:19 pm
@mommamia,
This is a sad display of the current administrations utter lack of respect for the Constitution. The Federal Reserve is the worst enslavement scheme ever, or the best, as it has us all under it's power.
0 Replies
 
mommamia
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 Nov, 2007 07:45 pm
@mommamia,
So, what Liberty dollar was doing was illegal? Or not. I understand you can't pay at walmart, but what if I wanted to say pay the electrician, and he wanted to be paid that way, would it be an illegal transaction? Also if the gold coins mentioned in the second article I posted are minted by the US government, then how can they be illegal? And since the price of gold fluctuates, how would I report something like that as income? Would it be based on the price of gold at the time of payment, or at tax time? When did the government get the right to tell us what we have to take as payment? And what kind of ramifications does this have on the barter system? Sorry for all the questions, but this really interested me, and while I may hold a couple of advanced degrees, I am woefully ignorant of economics
92b16vx
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 Nov, 2007 08:18 pm
@mommamia,
Funny thing is since this happened those coins have gone up in value almost ten fold.
0 Replies
 
klyph
 
  1  
Reply Tue 20 Nov, 2007 12:01 am
@mommamia,
The government enforcing what can and can't be accepted as currency is a gross overstepping of their bounds. I hope the officials in the FBI and IRS who are responsible are removed from their positions of authority.
0 Replies
 
briansol
 
  1  
Reply Tue 20 Nov, 2007 10:33 am
@mommamia,
mommamia;46108 wrote:
So, what Liberty dollar was doing was illegal? Or not. I understand you can't pay at walmart, but what if I wanted to say pay the electrician, and he wanted to be paid that way, would it be an illegal transaction? Also if the gold coins mentioned in the second article I posted are minted by the US government, then how can they be illegal? And since the price of gold fluctuates, how would I report something like that as income? Would it be based on the price of gold at the time of payment, or at tax time? When did the government get the right to tell us what we have to take as payment? And what kind of ramifications does this have on the barter system? Sorry for all the questions, but this really interested me, and while I may hold a couple of advanced degrees, I am woefully ignorant of economics


the problem is not the money/tender. the problem is the taxes, or lack thereof that the gov't won't be receiving.

that's why they stepped in on this.
Freeman15
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Nov, 2007 02:49 am
@briansol,
Here's a thought:

Since a FRN is a CREDIT for US dollars (not an amount of US dollars), and ultimately FRN's are traded much like a check can be transferred before being cashed, do dollars ever change hands if one pays one's employees in cash?

If no dollars change hands, no taxes can be levied. Ergo, a payment in cash cannot be construed as income by our friends at the IRS.
0 Replies
 
I Understand
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Nov, 2007 06:05 pm
@mommamia,
I have a few Ron Paul dollars myself
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Feds raid alternative currency headquarters
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 11/14/2024 at 12:33:35