1
   

Liberals "Social" Medicare Program

 
 
Reply Mon 16 Jul, 2007 03:25 pm
Liberals (Hilary to be specific) are pushing for a social medicare program. Sure little Jane Doe and her three kids she has (that she can barely afford in the first place) now have medicare which is fantastic. But for even the low middle class and higher, how is that fair to limit us to see specialists in our area if we have the money and are willing to spend to seek better experienced specialist. If a cancer patient wants to go to the Mayo Clinic to seek assistance, why should he have to be limited to the crummy hospital down the street when we have the means for better help? Sounds more like we're trying to be a socialist government to me.

Any comments?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 754 • Replies: 10
No top replies

 
Silverchild79
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Jul, 2007 03:35 pm
@TrueAmerican,
if Hillary gets in the white house the only people who's quality of life will suffer will be the middle class

the rich still won't care how much health care costs because their loaded, and the poor won't care because they get it for free. The middle class American will pay. All of us growing up who couldn't get financial aid for college because our parents made to much, and couldn't get financial aid from our parents because they just didn't have the money, will be the portion of America who can't afford healthcare, and can't get it for free.
TrueAmerican
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Jul, 2007 03:47 pm
@TrueAmerican,
Very true. Unfortionately, it's the middle class who is always getting looked over when laws pass reguarding paying taxes, medicare, ect.

Speaking of taxes, can someone point out where in the US Constitution it states we are mandated to pay federal taxes? I don't believe it is in there.
0 Replies
 
Red cv
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jul, 2007 05:24 pm
@TrueAmerican,
I pay 53 percent income tax and that is only one of a hundred taxes I pay for my FREE medical care. It's not free in Canada we are taxed even in death (14% ) tell the socialist who think it's free and it works to shove off and take jumb off a tall building. The US system isn't perfect, but FREE medical care will cripple your earning potential.
0 Replies
 
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jul, 2007 05:25 pm
@TrueAmerican,
Say no to Hillary.
0 Replies
 
Red cv
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jul, 2007 05:58 pm
@TrueAmerican,
If I had the "Vote" I'd never vote for that woman. I cannot believe people actually would vote for that vile bag of skin.
0 Replies
 
Arterion
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jul, 2007 06:36 pm
@Silverchild79,
Silverchild79;26695 wrote:
the rich still won't care how much health care costs because their loaded, and the poor won't care because they get it for free. The middle class American will pay. All of us growing up who couldn't get financial aid for college because our parents made to much, and couldn't get financial aid from our parents because they just didn't have the money, will be the portion of America who can't afford healthcare, and can't get it for free.


I feel your pain all too well. If they're going to give out healthcare, in order to be fair, they need to give it to everyone equally.
0 Replies
 
Reagaknight
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jul, 2007 08:01 pm
@TrueAmerican,
Medicare just sucks. Plain and simple. It screwed up the best health care system in the world, and it's just time for the government, altogether, to butt out.
Arterion
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jul, 2007 11:01 pm
@Reagaknight,
Reagaknight;27038 wrote:
Medicare just sucks. Plain and simple. It screwed up the best health care system in the world, and it's just time for the government, altogether, to butt out.


What would you suggest as an alternative?

If you don't have medical care, tough titty?
0 Replies
 
Reagaknight
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jul, 2007 08:32 am
@TrueAmerican,
I would suggest privatizing it and making people get off their arse and get a job so the government doesn't have to do everything for them. And if they can't get a job for actual reasons other than not being able to find one, yeah, have the government help, just get out otherwise. Did you know that our health care system was the best in the world before Medicare? Cheaper drugs, etc., don't seem all that bad to me.
Arterion
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jul, 2007 03:41 pm
@Reagaknight,
Reagaknight;27058 wrote:
I would suggest privatizing it and making people get off their arse and get a job so the government doesn't have to do everything for them. And if they can't get a job for actual reasons other than not being able to find one, yeah, have the government help, just get out otherwise.


Two things:

1) Your ability to live, if you depends on expensive medical care, should not be tied to your job. That's completely immoral. "Work for us like we want, or we'll fire you and you'll die! hahaha!" It gives your employer WAY too much power over you. You can't leave. You can't start working for yourself. They know this, and they exploit it. They can pay you as little as they feel like, and treat you as poorly as they feel like, up to the extent of the law. And you can suck it up and go on with it, or die. What kind of choice is that?

2) The majority of people without health care in the country do, in fact, work. There is and will probably always be a sector in the job market where it isn't feasible to pay all the extra expense of health care. I could start naming them all, but I don't feel it's necessary -- the bottom line is, not all jobs provide health care, and someone will always have to be working those jobs. Sure, one person might "rise above" those conditions and find a better job, but it's just going to mean someone else has to take it, and someone else, who works hard every day, is going to be without health care.

Quote:

Did you know that our health care system was the best in the world before Medicare? Cheaper drugs, etc., don't seem all that bad to me.


No, I didn't really know that. I'd like to see some facts to verify that, though. I do know, however, that the president has threatened to veto H.R. 4 (bottom of the list), which would let Medicare haggle over the price of drugs.

I do know that the cost of health care in countries where it's completely socialized is lower than here in the USA. And they have healthier citizens, and their healthcare is actually better, according to the WHO. Check out the Wikipedia article on it. It links to the actual reports at the bottom, in the references. We pay more than any other country, but still rank 37th. What's up with that? Most of the countries ranking above us have socialized medicine, and are healthier on average than us here in the USA.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Liberals "Social" Medicare Program
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/09/2025 at 07:13:58