1
   

Report: Bush Administration Funding Anti-Gay Groups in Uganda

 
 
Reply Thu 11 Oct, 2007 09:20 am
Int'l Rights Group Accuses Bush Admin. Of Funding African Violent Attacks On Gays
by 365Gay.com Newscenter Staff

Gay News From 365Gay.com

Posted: October 10, 2007 - 5:00 pm ET

(New York City) The International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission said Thursday that it has uncovered evidence that the Bush administration has funded groups in Uganda that actively promote violence and discrimination against lesbians and gay men.

In a letter to U.S. Global AIDS Coordinator Mark Dybul, IGLHRC criticized the funding and asked for assurances that future will not be used to support homophobic organizations anywhere in the world.

The IGLHRC said it began an investigation into the groups following a series of events in Uganda this summer.

At an August 16 press conference, Sexual Minorities of Uganda - a coalition of LGBT groups - launched Let us Live in Peace Campaign, calling for understanding and respect of sexual minorities. (story)

Homosexuality is illegal in Uganda and is punishable by between 14 years and life imprisonment. Last year, the Ugandan Parliament passed a constitutional amendment making same-sex marriages illegal.

The Let us Live in Peace campaign was met with an increase in hate speech by religious groups.

The primary instigator of the backlash, said the IGLHRC, was Pastor Martin Ssempa, leader of the Makerere University Community Church and spokesman for the Interfaith Family Culture Coalition Against Homosexuality in Uganda.

Ssempa organized an August 21 rally in Kampala at which more than one hundred demonstrators, including several government officials, demanded official action against LGBT people.

Ssempa has called homosexuality, "a criminal act against the laws of nature," and has said that, "there should be no rights granted to homosexuals in this country."

According to the U.S. Embassy in Uganda's website, Makerere University Community Church received a grant under a program designed to provide funds for AIDS prevention, treatment and care programs in Africa.

Ssempa and his coalition, which includes Roman Catholics, Anglicans, Baptists, Seventh Day Adventists, and Evangelicals, have threatened the safety of Ugandan LGBT rights activists by posting their names, photos and addresses on a website.

With support from conservative organizations such as Family Watch International in the United States, Ssempa has launched attacks not only on homosexuals but on Uganda's women's rights and HIV activists as well, the IGLHRC said.

"The U.S. government's funding is meant to alleviate suffering and support effective AIDS initiatives in Africa, not to further blame and stigmatize already marginalized groups," said IGLHRC Executive Director Paula Ettelbrick.

IGLHRC said it provided Ambassador Dybul with evidence of grants made by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) to the Makerere University Community Church.

The IGLHRC also said it found that the Uganda Muslim Tabliqh Women's Desk has also received a grant under the President's Emergency Fund for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) to implement HIV programs in Masaka District.

Recently, Muslim Tabliqh youth announced a plan to form an 'Anti-Gay Squad' to fight homosexuality in Uganda.

On 28 August 2007, Sheikh Multah Bukenya, a senior cleric in the Tabliqh Organization, was quoted during prayers at Noor Mosque in Kampala as saying that his followers are "ready to act swiftly and form this squad that will wipe out all abnormal practices like homosexuality in our society."

PEPFAR is a $15 billion Bush administration fund to fight AIDS in Africa.

According to IGLHRC's 2007 report, "Off the Map: How HIV/AIDS Programming is Failing Same-Sex Practicing People in Africa," less than U.S. $1 million targets HIV programs for men who have sex with men in Africa, despite strong evidence that HIV has a disproportionate impact on LGBT communities throughout the continent.

According to IGLHRC, the complicated PEPFAR sub-granting process lacks transparency and makes it difficult to track the funding.

"What we do know, is that few PEPFAR dollars are being used to fight HIV among gay men in Africa," said Cary Alan Johnson, IGLHRC Senior Specialist for Africa.

"Not only have African men who have sex with men been largely ignored with regard to HIV prevention services, but avowedly homophobic organizations are receiving funding for programs that will only further stigmatize homosexuality. This has to stop."

IGLHRC has called for increased transparency in the distribution of U.S. government HIV/AIDS funding internationally and a commitment by U.S. administrators that organizations espousing hate speech will not be funded.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 2,110 • Replies: 28
No top replies

 
Freeman15
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Oct, 2007 10:40 am
@aaronssongs,
We shouldn't be spending any US tax money overseas, let alone for this kind of crap. People own their lives, and should be permitted to do what they wish so long as they don't infringe on the life, liberty, or property rights of others. The US has no business funding any group that thinks differently, and especially has no place sending money overseas to such an institution.
aaronssongs
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Oct, 2007 11:59 am
@Freeman15,
Freeman15;41283 wrote:
We shouldn't be spending any US tax money overseas, let alone for this kind of crap. People own their lives, and should be permitted to do what they wish so long as they don't infringe on the life, liberty, or property rights of others. The US has no business funding any group that thinks differently, and especially has no place sending money overseas to such an institution.


parliament of whores. That's what the US government is.
mlurp
 
  1  
Reply Fri 19 Oct, 2007 08:00 pm
@aaronssongs,
My question is where does he find the money?
aaronssongs
 
  1  
Reply Fri 19 Oct, 2007 11:53 pm
@mlurp,
mlurp;42439 wrote:
My question is where does he find the money?


The RNC, of course! And any Christian right entities. Funny thing is the "Christian Right" is neither Christian, nor right. LOL.
mlurp
 
  1  
Reply Sat 20 Oct, 2007 06:00 pm
@aaronssongs,
It has to be more than just that....... This clown spends like he has trees that grow it over night on the White House lawn. looool
Sabz5150
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 Oct, 2007 05:22 am
@mlurp,
mlurp;42511 wrote:
It has to be more than just that....... This clown spends like he has trees that grow it over night on the White House lawn. looool


They call them "oil rigs".
mlurp
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 Oct, 2007 08:15 am
@Sabz5150,
I don't think the greedy give him their $ to spend on this. But it is just a opinion.
0 Replies
 
Curmudgeon
 
  1  
Reply Tue 23 Oct, 2007 07:43 am
@aaronssongs,
The congress is spending that money folks! Our tax money. If you think it will change if or when a Democrat is elected as President, I hope you document the changes and report back to us.
Aid decisions are not made by the President, they are made by bureaucrats, and by and large they don't change when administrations change.
Whatever cv
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Oct, 2007 08:40 am
@mlurp,
mlurp;42439 wrote:
My question is where does he find the money?


China...Japan...and a whole crap load of foreign governments who lend us money so Bush can bankrupt us....

Bush is a dildo...and he's ***ed each and every American ....:beat:
0 Replies
 
Whatever cv
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Oct, 2007 08:43 am
@Curmudgeon,
Very Happy
Curmudgeon;42784 wrote:
The congress is spending that money folks! Our tax money. If you think it will change if or when a Democrat is elected as President, I hope you document the changes and report back to us.
Aid decisions are not made by the President, they are made by bureaucrats, and by and large they don't change when administrations change.


However, with a democrat president, we can balance a budget, get rid of corporate welfare, end a war for oil that is costing us billions a month...and live normal lives...
aaronssongs
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Oct, 2007 04:44 pm
@Whatever cv,
Whatever!;42899 wrote:
Very Happy

However, with a democrat president, we can balance a budget, get rid of corporate welfare, end a war for oil that is costing us billions a month...and live normal lives...


Hush, truth! Give a democrat a chance to f... up, why don't ya? (not that he or she would, though)
Freeman15
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Oct, 2007 05:10 pm
@aaronssongs,
aaronssongs;42941 wrote:
Hush, truth! Give a democrat a chance to f... up, why don't ya? (not that he or she would, though)


Yeah, Johnson and Carter did WONDERS for our country. Bill Clinton would've done just as horrible a job if he'd had a DNC congress. Whenever one party controls everything, we all get fucked.

If the president is of party A, the congress should be 60% party B. The Clinton era worked because there was little chance of veto override, and NO chance of official presidential misconduct going unreported.
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Oct, 2007 05:57 pm
@aaronssongs,
aaronssongs;41305 wrote:
parliament of whores. That's what the US government is.


Yeah.....but I bet you receive some sort of financial assistance from that whorish parliament.:no:
aaronssongs
 
  1  
Reply Thu 25 Oct, 2007 01:52 pm
@Pinochet73,
Pinochet73;42958 wrote:
Yeah.....but I bet you receive some sort of financial assistance from that whorish parliament.:no:


NO, actually.....I don't? Do you know something I don't? What about you?
And excuse me, but I thought you had me on "ignore"...people never live up to their word.
Celerity
 
  1  
Reply Thu 25 Oct, 2007 02:30 pm
@aaronssongs,
http://mercury.walagata.com/w/the-salamander/moonbat.jpg

nothing to see here
Freeman15
 
  1  
Reply Thu 25 Oct, 2007 02:44 pm
@aaronssongs,
aaronssongs;43110 wrote:
people never live up to their word.


Said the pot to the kettle.
0 Replies
 
scooby-doo cv
 
  1  
Reply Thu 25 Oct, 2007 03:15 pm
@Whatever cv,
Whatever!;42899 wrote:
Very Happy

However, with a democrat president, we can balance a budget, get rid of corporate welfare, end a war for oil that is costing us billions a month...and live normal lives...


well said :thumbup:
mlurp
 
  1  
Reply Thu 25 Oct, 2007 04:34 pm
@Curmudgeon,
Curmudgeon;42784 wrote:
The congress is spending that money folks! Our tax money. If you think it will change if or when a Democrat is elected as President, I hope you document the changes and report back to us.
Aid decisions are not made by the President, they are made by bureaucrats, and by and large they don't change when administrations change.


Only that more are appointed by the fools we elect. Get the $ and these appointed ones out of the process and we might have a real government.
0 Replies
 
mlurp
 
  1  
Reply Thu 25 Oct, 2007 04:38 pm
@Whatever cv,
Whatever!;42899 wrote:
Very Happy

However, with a democrat president, we can balance a budget, get rid of corporate welfare, end a war for oil that is costing us billions a month...and live normal lives...


That sounds nice whatever. But is it that simple? My thougt on electing a new President is right after he is in they take him into a small room and show a file of the Kennedy muder from the shooters point of view and then ask what is your agenda? Sure it is far fetched but add your own view. Seems the last few presidents have more power and less thought of the American people or our thoughts on any issue.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Report: Bush Administration Funding Anti-Gay Groups in Uganda
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.1 seconds on 09/28/2024 at 09:36:35