@crackface mcgee,
crackface_mcgee;38610 wrote:Or you could always stoop to posting an unfounded rumor that the Secretary of State is gay and a hypocrite, fail to offer any proof of her being either gay or anti-gay, claim that the post is not personal, and boast about the intelligence and language skills of the post.
What a joke!
Stoop? I never stoop. If you cannot criticize this corrupt administration, on the merits...then you have no business chastising me for posting an excerpt from a book, speculating on the likelihood of the Sec. of State being a lesbian...the piece, which is from Washington Post diplomatic correspondent Glenn Kessler's new book, " The Confidante: Condoleezza Rice and the Creation of the Bush Legacy", says in part, ".... Even if Rice is heterosexual, however, it is fascinating and mind-boggling that this woman whose best male friend is an openly gay liberal and whose best female "friend" is a "liberal progressive," would work for a president who has opposed every gay rights initiative and tried to enshrine religious hatred in the Constitution. What does it say about them as well? ...." Indeed!
Excuse me, but I listed my source. And, perhaps, it is personal, because I can't stand Rice...she has, essentially, "sold out" her race and her soul, for ambition, and power(muted, though it may be).
And with every post I write, I display my considerable intelligence, and language skills....while you, on the otherhand.....don't hate, appreciate.
