GAYS - The Bible is full of Crapola

If there is a God then He would create them for a reason.

If it was naturally abhorrence then the majority, not the minority, would hate. We do not therefore it is a natural occurrence.

You do not see other species hate. Get off the fence bud.
Regards
DL

IMO Anal sex is not natural. Vaginal is. Try to come up to any species that does not have the particular orfice or just by mistake you put in the wrong place, unless your two gay guys more then likely the receiving party is gonna object?

With freedom comes responsibility.
Free speech is great when hating with a reason. Homophobes tend to not have a reason. I wonder what it is that makes a homophobe care about other men's body parts. Sounds like something twisted to me.

Regards
DL

I think the majority do find it abhorrant. A lot of liberals don't mind until its next door to them. As for natural, well, anal sex might be enjoyable, but natural. 'Not really what it was designed for!' As for other species, I don't see any other species on this network arguing the point. As for being on fence, the majority always sit on the fence. I think you are a bit of a fence sitter yourself, in your way of course.

With freedom comes responsibility.
Free speech is great when hating with a reason. Homophobes tend to not have a reason. I wonder what it is that makes a homophobe care about other men's body parts. Sounds like something twisted to me.

Regards
DL

I'll leave them alone just so long as the keep it indoors. We know the chances of that, LOL.

The majority has accepted Gays as a normal part of life, after all they come from normal households.
As to fence sitting, where am I on a fence?

Regards
DL

People who disapprove of homosexuality are not interested in mens' or womens' body parts. The people who are interested in body parts are those with corrupt minds who have thought about immoral actions so much they can't think of anything else.

Please be more accurate in your attempts to discredit a belief or a rebuke.

Phobia means:
Definition of phobia - Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary
"Main Entry: pho?bia
Pronunciation: 'fO-bE-&
Function: noun
Etymology: -phobia
: an exaggerated usually inexplicable and illogical fear of a particular object, class of objects, or situation"

Calling disapproval of homosexuality homophopbia serves two purposes:

1. Discredits (or attempts to discredit) the person they call homophobic

2. Avoids a self-examination by side-stepping the issue and placing the spotlight on the person who rebukes the homosexual behavior or support for the homosexual behavior.

In the definition above, the terms inexplicable or illogical are used to describe a phobia. Homosexuals and their supporters use the term homophobe and homophobia to attempt to discredit someone who believes what they do is perverted and corrupt. These are value judgements, not phobias. Judgements are well thought out.

Neither value judgement, a perversion or corruption, is illogical or inexplicable. Both are explainable. The homosexual and their supporters do not want the explanation and so they label the person who holds the belief as unstable with a phobia about the perverted behavior.

Homoesexuals and their supporters use labels that conform to the corrupt homosexual mind set. The labels indicate a belief that the individual is unable to reason and control their expression based on that reason. The reason homosexuals and their supporters need to maintain this mind set is if they believed every individual is responsible for his/her actions and inactions, they would have to examine their behavior and their choices and realize what they are doing is corrupt and a perversion.

I think you sit on the fence with the Gays. I think you are are one of those types, who instead of just being open and proud of what you are 'if you are' Have to find some justification by looking in the Bible. Then by finding some obscure reference, twist it to suit. Then try to tell those of us who do find it abhorrant, 'in the open that is' that it is natural or normal. Normal to them maybe, and thats OK. Just don't push it in my face, or my children.
Plus even the church bends to it, after 2000 years of condemning it. You know why! because not enough go to church anymore!

How so?
With Logic please.

Regards
DL

I have four straight, so far, sons. I went to this side of the fence many years ago.
If I were to degenerate anyone I would need to find a reason other than religious. The book say so cannot be a good enough reason.
Other than the book what is a logical reason. Overpopulation does not count.

Regards
DL

Read it again and look for the logic. If you can't see it, you are either being obtuse or deliberate in your lack of understanding. I vote that you are deliberately discounting the answer. In which case, no answer would satisfy you. That's the bottom line.

Coward. You are telling us tie one or both hands behind our backs before you'll fight. I won't drop my beliefs and accept yours before I engage in a discussion.

Your premise is we must leave our moral framework at the door before we come in a discuss the issue. I hope you don't do this with your sons. If you do, they'll despise you and you'll reap what you sow from your own offspring.