@Silverchild79,
Okay, I don't mean that it's physically impossible to be a Muslim, it's impossible to be a
good Muslim and follow the Koran and willingly live in the U.S. as a
good citizen.
And, Azmr, if you want to say that the large majority of Arab Muslim leaders and most of other nationalities are the minority preachers of Islam, whatever. The fact is, they're actually the ones who have Islam
right.
Quote:
With the stoning of children: Jesus was in a heated debate with the Pharisees after they criticized him for not washing his hands before he ate. He countered by saying "well you don't stone your children in accordance with gods law, the prophets of the Torah were right, your hypocrites and you do many things like this"
So, yes, he was saying they were hypocrites for criticizing him for not folling the law of man when they refuse to follow the law of the Old Testament when it comes to their relatives. Not an endorsement of the laws.
Quote:of all the "many things like this" Jesus specifically chose the stoning of children. In any heated debate with an adversary you will always pick the largest polarities to argue, and you certainly wouldn't call somebody a hypocrite for not doing something you wouldn't do either. That would say that Jesus was "the pot calling the kettle black", a serious error to make in a debate. So basically either Jesus was pro stoning children, or the perfect living god on earth was a terrible debater who lacked the intellect to see that his argument in and of itself was hypocritical.
How again was his argument hypocritical? He's saying, 'you criticize me for not following your laws when you do not follow them', so we can assume that he meant also, 'don't criticize because you could be targets of the same sort of criticism', not 'stone your children.'
Quote:It's really a moot point anyway because one of biggest poofs that the Bible is not the word of God is that God sanctions rape, murder, slavery, and child abuse. Hardly very God like. And before you go off on that feeble attempt to say that the old testament "doesn't count", Jesus himself saw the Torah in a very literal sense.
The Torah is literal, a literal account of the Jewish history. The thing is that God's commands were the most sensible things to do, because it would have been easy for large numbers of conquered people to rebel against a relatively small group of Israelites. It was only what was necessary.
Quote:On Corinthians The Apostle is very clear in this Christian work that he speaks for God, delivering a Holy message that Jesus himself sent to him in a vision. He goes on to make some seriously sexist remarks and sanctions slavery in the new covenant. Either you accept that or you decanonize the New Testament, which is very much against what the Bible itself says about dis considering portions of it.
Speaking to the people of that time, unless you happen to be an ancient Corinthian, he is not talking to you, he is talking to people whose culture and society would be destroyed by things like equal rights.
Quote:Or maybe Corinthians isn't "as canon" as the canonical gospels. Well even those four books weren't written until well after the death of Jesus (in fact the earliest known copy is of the Gospel of Mark, dated to 125 CE nearly 100 years after the crucifiction, and makes no mention of the resurrection)
All of the Gospels are different and that doesn't mean that the earliest known is the eariliest, considering that that Gospel would be widely read among Christians at the time (at least literate ones) and Mark was dead. Corinthians is a letter to the Corinthians, not a letter to modern Christians, and should be treated as such, just as not following some parts of Leviticus, the book of laws for Jews and their priests especially, does not mean Christians pick and choose their faith. There is still some use in it, obviously.
Quote:no your attempts to wash away what's actually a very real part of your religion are shaky at best and seems to be more driven by your lack of education on Christianity. Or perhaps you would put away the "word of God" as found in the Bible in favor of your own "man made" covenant with God. Funny, that's exactly what Jesus was so mad about in that debate...
Maybe it's you lacking the power of analysis rather than me lacking knowledge. The fact is that many laws in the Old Testament were meant for Jews, not Christians, and that's what Jesus was talking about. The list of books in the Bible is 'man made', should we throw that out? Oh, but then where is the word of God? It doesn't work, especially when the word of God basically gives Peter and his successors (the Popes) the authority to, within reasonable limits, change some practices of the church, which obviously has to change from time to time.