1
   

Guantánamo Bay

 
 
pistoff
 
Reply Tue 25 Nov, 2003 05:52 am
Guantánamo Bay- A brief history

http://www.commondreams.org/views03/1124-10.htm
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,216 • Replies: 15
No top replies

 
Fedral
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Nov, 2003 11:26 am
Guantánamo Bay is a military base located on the soil of a hostile nation.

Lets get a few things straight. A military base is under military control and thus subject to military law.

If a civilian speeds through Fort Sill, Oklahoma, you won't be ticketed by the Oklahoma State Police. You will be arrested by the Military Police and will be subject to the penalties of the United States Military because the rules on a military base are DIFFERENT than the rules of the civilian world.

We haven't had a lot of experience with a military outpost on hostile foreign soil but the rules there are even MORE stringent. This is because the foreign power is doing all they can to remove the base. So we make the rules harsh, even draconian by most standards. But this is because of something so many of you 'armchair social theorists' don't seem to get.

Most of us live in a real world where the bad guys want to kill us!

Those 'harsh' sounding rules are all that stand between us and death. So please understand that the normal rules that you folks are used to don't always apply everywhere we would like them to.
0 Replies
 
Moot
 
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Nov, 2003 02:46 am
Quote:
Lets get a few things straight. A military base is under military control and thus subject to military law.


But isn't the military's main priorty to protect the constitution? What about the Geneva convention? We are not in a declared war per se, so how can the US justify this? Is there no rule or international law this country follows for prisoners?

When the Taliban first took US soldiers prisoner, the first thing the Americans demanded was humane treatment for the US prisoners according to the Geneva Convention. Yet when the US took Taliban prisoners, some were killed inside of a trailer shot full of holes and others were wisked away to Guantonomo Bay never to be seen again. How long is that going to go on? I've heard the prisoners are commiting suicide. Soon, anti-Bush Americans will be classified as terrorists and they too will be wisked away to Guantonomo Bay.
0 Replies
 
pistoff
 
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Nov, 2003 02:56 am
Rule of Law
Seems that the USa Govt. demands that we follow all the laws but they don't have to.
0 Replies
 
pistoff
 
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Nov, 2003 03:11 am
The Military
They swear to uphold and defend the Constitution of the USA.
Why aren't the doing that at Q Bay?
0 Replies
 
Moot
 
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Nov, 2003 06:20 am
Quote:
They swear to uphold and defend the Constitution of the USA.
Why aren't the doing that at Q Bay?


That is what anyone who doesn't watch FN would like to know. I can't help but notice that the entire Constitution and the Declaration of Indepence is under seige by this admininstration and it's supporters, which by coincidence happens to include the military. They want to change and/or abolish everything and not for the best IMO.

It feels like our country has been invaded and we didn't even see it coming. Now all we can do is react to the rightwing onslaught.

And uh... my take on Guantonomo bay is.....who's going to stop the US/Bush from doing what ever the begeezus it wants to do, where ever it wants to do it in and to who ever it wants to do it to? They keep proving this point over and over.
0 Replies
 
pistoff
 
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Nov, 2003 06:26 am
Super Power
The Golden Rule. He who has the most gold rules. Also, GW, the Commander In Chief has the most power Military on the planet and the most nukes. GW was appointed by God and gets instructions straight from God. Guess the people better bow.
0 Replies
 
Fedral
 
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Nov, 2003 10:56 am
You who haven't been in the military don't seem to understand the sacrifices that those who served in the military make in joining.

The first is that while IN the military you DO NOT have all the rights of a normal American citizen.

Although the military is the defender of the Constitution, the active members of the military are not always afforded all the benefits and protections of said document.

It may be hard for y'all to understand this, but the men and women of our armed forces volunteer to put themselves in a system that does this. This goes to show the dedication of the young people of this country.

Just to give you an example or two:

A friend of mine in the Navy was stationed on the USS Sierra. He was of the Wiccan religion as were a number of his shipmates. He wanted permission to use a storage room to hold services during one of their High holidays. The Captain denied them permission due to the "Possible effects on crew morale"
Freedom of Religion: Curtailed due to military necessity.

Free speech? Well you can shoot the breeze with your buddies about your disagreement with the war all you want, but you can't send an article to the newspaper about why you think the war is bad.

The men and women that defend the country are the Constitutions most vigorous defenders, probably because they don't take those rights for granted after being denied some of their benefits.
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Nov, 2003 12:58 pm
Fedral, the prisoners at Guantanamo are not members of the military. Many of them would seem to have been randomly captured in Afghanistan. And the UCMJ is the biggest disgrace the "leader of the free world" has to offer. A system where one can receive 45 days extra duty, reduction in rank, and loss of half pay for three months for trivialities, and at the same time allows commanders to overlook their soldiers criminal acts of spousal and child abuse is not justice.
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Nov, 2003 01:11 pm
An example of the UCMJ process.
But we have to get him for something!
Quote:
Chaplain Held in Espionage Case Is Freed
By NEIL A. LEWIS

Published: November 26, 2003

ASHINGTON, Nov. 25 ?- The military said on Tuesday that it was releasing Capt. James J. Yee, the former Muslim chaplain at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, after confining him for nearly three months on suspicion of espionage activities.

Captain Yee will be allowed to resume his chaplain duties at Fort Benning, Ga.


At the same time, though, the United States Southern Command, based in Miami, which administers the detention center at Guantánamo Bay, said it was investigating other possible violations of military code by Captain Yee, including contentions that he had kept pornography on his government computer and had an affair. Those new charges are in addition to the ones brought in October contending that Captain Yee, also known as Youseff Yee, had disobeyed orders by taking classified information home when he was leaving Guantánamo in September.

Captain Yee's civilian lawyer, Eugene R. Fidell of Washington, said the fact that the new charges seemed to have nothing to do with national security demonstrated that military authorities had made a major error when they held up Captain Yee as a potential spy at Guantánamo, where he ministered to the mostly Islamic prisoner population.

Mr. Fidell said the initial set of charges of failing to obey a lawful order by taking classified information home without proper covers was not a serious infraction. The new charges, he said, showed that the military was persecuting Captain Yee to cover up its mistake.

"They have destroyed this man's reputation for what turns out to be no good reason," Mr. Fidell said, "and now it appears they are pursuing matters in a completely vindictive manner."

Raul Duany, a spokesman for the Southern Command in Tampa, disputed that assertion, saying: "At no time have we made any implications about what Captain Yee might have been charged with. We only said we're investigating him."

But unnamed military officials were quoted in numerous news reports as saying Captain Yee had apparently become sympathetic with the Muslims held at Guantánamo and had kept on his computer highly classified information. That information, they said, possibly included notes about which detainees had been questioned by which investigators and on what subjects.

Most of the 660 prisoners at Guantánamo were captured in Afghanistan or Pakistan.

In addition to the pornography and adultery charges against Captain Yee, the Southern Command also charged him on Tuesday with falsely telling a superior that certain compact discs had been cleared for use by detainees. The charge sheet did not provide further details.

Mr. Duany said Captain Yee would face an Article 32 proceeding, an investigation of the charges much like a grand jury in the civilian criminal-justice system. The proceeding could recommend dismissal of the case or some sort of court-martial. In this case, the Article 32 proceeding would be open to the public.

Captain Yee has been held at a naval brig in South Carolina, and Mr. Fidell had complained that his client was needlessly kept in solitary confinement and often in chains and manacles.

On Monday, Mr. Fidell wrote to President Bush, asking him to intercede with the military to at least have Captain Yee released to less harsh conditions.

"I have no alternative to conclude that President Bush or his advisers had some hand in this," Mr. Fidell said on Tuesday, "and I give them great credit."

Captain Yee will have complete freedom at Fort Benning, Mr. Duany said, with the only restriction that he not contact anyone associated with the mission at Guantánamo.
0 Replies
 
pistoff
 
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Nov, 2003 02:42 pm
Screwups.
Quote:
"They have destroyed this man's reputation for what turns out to be no good reason," Mr. Fidell said, "and now it appears they are pursuing matters in a completely vindictive manner."


I have been in the military. Most that are there are morons; similar to the right wing fascists on this board. The Military is the Police Force for the Govt. protecting property rights, engaging in teritorial expansion and enforcing Capitalism for the Multi-Corps. That is their basic mission. All this talk of freedom is pure crap. Study history.
0 Replies
 
Moot
 
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Nov, 2003 05:05 pm
I think most of the soldiers we have in the military at the moment did not join for love of country, but rather as a last resort for money and an education. The US military is now going into Mexico to recruit Latinos to go to Iraq. So it's not really about loyalty to country is it?
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Nov, 2003 05:12 pm
Moot wrote:
I think most of the soldiers we have in the military at the moment did not join for love of country, but rather as a last resort for money and an education.

Yup, or, in my case, because the military will pay off student loans.

Quote:
The US military is now going into Mexico to recruit Latinos to go to Iraq. So it's not really about loyalty to country is it?

Source please?
0 Replies
 
pistoff
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Nov, 2003 04:57 am
Justice?
Quote:
The prisoners at Guantánamo, as matters stand at present, will be tried by military tribunals. The prisoners have no access to the writ of habeas corpus to determine whether their detention is even arguably justified. The military will act as interrogators, prosecutors, defense counsel, judges, and when death sentences are imposed, as executioners.


http://www.commondreams.org/views03/1127-08.htm
0 Replies
 
Wilso
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Nov, 2003 05:51 am
Another example of the US going against the standards they claim to uphold, which is done whenever it's convenient.
0 Replies
 
pistoff
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Nov, 2003 04:22 pm
If this happened to American soldiers...
there would be an uproar over it.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Guantánamo Bay
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/10/2026 at 12:44:46