How to Stop the Bush/RNC Illegal Alien Amnesty Plan!

Personally, I've had it with Bush, especially after he called the Minutemen volunteers "vigilantes." First, Reagan gave in back in 1986 and since then we've given amnesty to over 5 1/2 MILLION illegal aliens ( Numbers USA ). Now nothing has changed and we're going to give between 12 to 20 MILLION (20 million 2 1/2 years ago according to Bear Stearns Report, January 2005 according to: We Need a Fence! ). But of course the politicians say "This time will be different. We'll fix it this time. Trust us."

It seems like every 20 years Washington D.C. screws America by "forgiving" BILLIONS of dollars in loans to third world countries, loans that are "guaranteed by the U.S. government" so the U.S. taxpayers pay for them. Every 20 years Washington says Social Security is about to collapse and we need to "fix it." And every 20 years Washington grants amnesty to millions of illegal aliens. When will we ever learn that neither the Republicans nor the Democrats have any intention of fixing these problems?

A "high-tech fence" does NOTHING to stop illegals from entering, it only notifies the Border Patrol where illegals have entered. Then the BP is supposed to have men and vehicles available to send out all those different areas to chase them down before the illegals' accomplices on this side of the border meet them to whisk them away. (SUVs and GPS make this quite easy for their accomplices.)

Do Americans actually think once illegals become citizens they'll keep working as farm laborers, housekeepers, fast food workers, gardeners or construction workers for low pay? No way, Jose! As illegals they are demanding free health care (in our Emergency Rooms), free schooling for their kids, in-state tuition at our public colleges and universities (paying less than out-of-state American citizens), legalization and the right to vote. What do you think they'll demand once they are U.S. citizens and can vote? What do you think politicians will offer them to pander to their voting block?

The GOP controlled both chambers of Congress and the Presidency from 2000 to 2006 -- for HALF A DECADE after 9/11 -- and did NOTHING to stop the flow. Sure, the House tried hard in 2006, but Bush undermined them and the GOP lead Senate did nothing. Until the RNC comes out for a "low tech" fence (i.e., a real fence, preferably a wall with a vehicle trench and a couple fences), I'm only sending Bush Pesos to the RNC. I'm only supporting individual candidates, not the RNC. I encourage you to do the same.

An idea for a bumper sticker: "Give Deportation a Chance"

Pass this on to family, friends and like-minded individuals and post it on other forums.

*****

This is a WorldNetDaily printer-friendly version of the article which follows.
To view this item online, visit http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/ar...TICLE_ID=55967

Friday, June 1, 2007
INVASION USA
Republican revolt over immigration
RNC fires all phone solicitors as cash 'evaporates' over Bush
Posted: June 1, 2007
2:39 a.m. Eastern

? 2007 WorldNetDaily.com

Just two days after President Bush slammed critics of his immigration policy, the Republican National Committee has reportedly fired all 65 of its telephone solicitors, as donors are said to be furious over the president's stance to give legal status to millions of illegal aliens.

"Every donor in 50 states we reached has been angry, especially in the last month and a half, and for 99 percent of them immigration is the No. 1 issue," a fired phone-bank employee told the Washington Times.

Republican outrage over President Bush's immigration policy has led to some to create satirical currency such as this

Ousted staff members told the paper Anne Hathaway, the committee's chief of staff, summoned the solicitors and told them they were out of work, effective immediately.

They claim the reasons they were given were an estimated 40 percent plunge in small-donor contributions, as well as aging phone-bank equipment the RNC said would cost too much to modernize.

The committee, however, is denying any drop-off in the influx of cash.

"Any assertion that overall donations have gone down is patently false," RNC spokeswoman Tracey Schmitt told the Times via e-mail. "We continue to out-raise our Democrat counterpart by a substantive amount (nearly double)."

Schmitt said terminating the phone solicitation staff "was not an easy decision. The first and primary motivating factor was the state of the phone-bank technology, which was outdated and difficult to maintain. The RNC was advised that we would soon need an entire new system to remain viable."

She also indicated "the changing ways in which people choose to contribute" meant the RNC's in-house phone bank "was simply no longer cost effective, although unfortunate."

While the ex-employees acknowledged their equipment was aging, they also said the steep drop in donations "probably" hastened the end of the in-house operation.

"Last year, my solicitations totaled $164,000, and this year the way they were running for the first four months, they would total $100,000 by the end of 2007," another fired phone-bank employee who asked not to be identified told the paper.

Previous GOP donors have given RNC solicitors a lashing about the president's proposed immigration measure.

"We have not heard anyone in our donor calls who supported the president on immigration," said a fired phone solicitor, who described himself as a Republican activist.

"We write these comments up from each call, and give them to a supervisor who passes them on to the finance director or the national chairman," he said. "But when I talked with the White House, the people there told me they got nothing but positive comments on the president's immigration stand."

As WND reported, opponents of the controversial immigration deal forged by the White House and a bipartisan group of senators in private meetings "don't want to do what's right for America," according to President Bush in a speech Tuesday.

"The fundamental question is, will elected officials have the courage necessary to put a comprehensive immigration plan in place," Bush told students and instructors at the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center in Glynco, Ga.

The president argued the proposal, which offers a path to citizenship for the more than 12 million illegal immigrants, will make "it more likely we can enforce our border ? and at the same time uphold the great immigrant tradition of the United States of America."

The plan, which was quickly sent to the Senate floor without public hearings, has been dismissed as "amnesty" by opponents. But Bush emphasized the bill requires a number of security and enforcement measures be carried out before those features can be implemented.

They include barriers on the Mexican border, hiring more Border Patrol agents and an identification system for employees.

The bill would allow illegal immigrants to come forward and obtain a "Z visa" that puts them on a track for permanent residency within eight to 13 years. Fees and a fine of $5,000 are required and heads of household first must return to their home countries.

The illegals, however, would be able to obtain a probationary card right away to live and work in the U.S.

The plan also would create a guest worker program, allowing foreigners to come to the U.S. on a temporary basis with no guarantee of eventually gaining citizenship.

Bush acknowledged many Americans "are skeptical about immigration reform, primarily because they don't think the government can fix the problems."

"And my answer to the skeptics is: Give us a chance to fix the problems in a comprehensive way that enforces our border and treats people with decency and respect," the president said. "Give us a chance to fix this problem. Don't try to kill this bill before it gets moving."

Bush said opponents "determined to find fault with this bill" will always be able to pick out something in it they don't like.

"If you want to kill the bill, if you don't want to do what's right for America, you can pick one little aspect out of it," he said.

"You can use it to frighten people, or you can show leadership and solve this problem once and for all."

The Senate, now in recess, will continue debate on the bill next week.

A Rasmussen poll last week showed only 26 percent of American voters favor the Senate plan.

The public is most passionate about enforcement, the survey indicated. About 72 percent of voters said it's "very important" for "the government to improve its enforcement of the borders and reduce illegal immigration."

The figure jumped to 89 percent among Republicans, while 65 percent of Democrats and 63 percent of unaffiliated voters believed enforcement is "very important."


posted from another forum. Help stop the destruction of America. They are hoping that the focus will be on the war, and blank check they wrote for it, but it isn't. We see what they are trying to do to our country. People like Drnaline would have you believe that we are fighting all the terrorist we need to in Iraq, and that our borders are perfectly safe with the majority of our troops and money over in the Middle East...this is a FLAT OUT LIE. Don't believe it, wake up, we have CONFIRMED dry runs in airliners in 2004, and been making bust of terrorist in this country since 2001. But it is only a matter of time before it hits, and when it does it is going to hit ******* hard.