1
   

Redstate to Ron Paul's spam army: STFU

 
 
Reply Thu 1 Nov, 2007 03:13 pm
RedState.com Blog Limits New Ron Paul Supporters

very interesting article, but no worries. Conflictingviews will not gag Ron Paul's supporters, although I'd imagine after the primaries he'll prolly go third party. If so we'll just move his bio over to Independent Candidates.

[quote]"Effective immediately, new users may not shill for Ron Paul in any way shape, form or fashion," wrote Leon Wolf, one of RedState's bloggers. "Not in comments, not in diaries, nada."[/quote] -Redstate
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 598 • Replies: 2
No top replies

 
Freeman15
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 Nov, 2007 03:26 pm
@Silverchild79,
Silverchild79;43920 wrote:
RedState.com Blog Limits New Ron Paul Supporters

very interesting article, but no worries. Conflictingviews will not gag Ron Paul's supporters, although I'd imagine after the primaries he'll prolly go third party. If so we'll just move his bio over to Independent Candidates.

-Redstate


He isn't going to run third party, and Redstate is a socially conservative board (I took the liberty of browsing it when I first saw this story), which is why they're blocking Ron Paul supporters. I'm sure some of them are trolling, just like I'm sure Giuliani supporters won't shut the hell up about 9/11, it's expected from any large group of people. This still doesn't explain away his massive base of support.

You seem to spend a lot of time writing hit-pieces on Paul. I thought he wasn't a feasible candidate?

FYI:

Most states have "sore loser" laws, where a candidate can't lose a primary, only to switch parties and run in the general election, so even if Paul WANTED to run third party, he could only do so in a small percentage of states. He's already said he won't run third party though, and unlike other politicians, Ron Paul does what he says he's going to do.
Silverchild79
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 Nov, 2007 03:39 pm
@Freeman15,
Freeman15;43922 wrote:
You seem to spend a lot of time writing hit-pieces on Paul. I thought he wasn't a feasible candidate?


It's a matter of site maintenance. The only people posting Ron Paul stuff here are on his jock. I provide a counter argument. Just like I put up a video of Dodd blasting Rudy (who I'm voting for), some things you do for balance and somethings you do as a poster to argue your point

anti ron paul happens to do both of those
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Redstate to Ron Paul's spam army: STFU
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/11/2025 at 12:14:36