@Silverchild79,
oh I'll agree all day long that the Pentagon attack doesn't add up, but the conclusion is where I depart from you...
Eye witnesses said that they saw a fighter plane. The wreckage also contained a turbine from a jet engine... a jet engine way to small to be from the jet the government tells us it is. Doesn't mean it's an inside job though
The engine found on the scene is something that can be found on a fighter jet. The lack of slide marks on the lawn also suggests a smaller jet or an angle of attack much different then the official story, but the government had other reasons
I've been to my share of military installations, one thing always surprised me. Even overseas the lack of anti air was astounding. Combine that with a target that isn't terribly inland on the grand scheme of things and you have the proverbial high interest, soft target.
It was a missile I believe, fired from a MIG which then Kamikazed into into the building. Why wouldn't the government tell us that? Simple: to protect the American confidence.
This isn't pearl harbor, this is the "heart" of our defense system. hit clean by a single jet. How vulnerable does that make us look? What would ti do to the economy? But if you make it look like the other three attempted attacks.....
it dulls the effect