My take on Global Warming (AGW)

If i'm so predictable then whats your excuse for not being able to refute my arguments?

Hmmm, maybe it's cause, you know, terrorists are real. We've been attacked by extremists before, and a mutant cloned cow has never gone on a killing rampage nor has an American nuclear power plant evr blown up.

FF: "All the world's problems must be blamed on Bush and the millions, if not billions, of White Christian men who came before him."

What the **** are you talking about half of your statements make no sense whatsoever. When have i ever said anything about mutant killer cows or exploding power plants? And why are you talking about terrorists, we said a lot of things about terrorists could you please be more specific? And how do any of these things constitute an excuse for your inability to refute my arguments?

?Your argument through the cartoon seemed to be that Bush is a fearmongerer.

If not, please explain. You can't copy and paste a cartoon and call it an argument if you don't explain.

If so, it would be about terrorists, a real threat. Sp the Democrat fearmongering about nuclear power and also about cloned food would be unfounded by comparison.

I'll be careful not to do anything that might take too much brainpower to infer on your part. I realize that are both excitable and not too bright.

true, but what does that have to do with your inability to refute my arguments?

I'm not a democrat, and have never argued such issues. So what does democrat arguments have to do with me?

Reag - FF called you Bub..?

Apparently so. Something tells me he doesn't respect me all that much.

I'll live.

I just refuted your arguments in that post, I didn't refute the idea that I couldn't refute the arguments, I skipped the middle man and went straight for the arguments themselves.

Are you intentionally like this? My original statement was not about you, it was about the Democrats.

yeah, arguments that i never brought up...

i wasn't talking about democrats, i was talking about the supposed "predictablility" of my statements.

And as I said, I never responded to that statement, I responded to the original.

FF: If i'm so predictable then whats your excuse for not being able to refute my arguments?

REG: Hmmm, maybe it's cause, you know, terrorists are real. We've been attacked by extremists before, and a mutant cloned cow has never gone on a killing rampage nor has an American nuclear power plant evr blown up.

Nope looks like you did respond to my statement!

By responding to your original argument, which you said I was unable to respond to, rather than responding to your statement that I could not refute the original argument.

You must hold the record for making such a simple situation so friggin complex you can't find your way through the crap.

If you were responding to my 'original' statement then why did you quote my recent statement? Unless you are incapable of scrolling up and clicking the "quote" button, you are making youself look like a fool.

You said that I was unable to respond to your original statement, so I quoted that statement, and in response to that statement, I responded to the argument you were talking about.

Why is this so hard to comprehend?

Eventually we will run out of oil, what will happen then?

Who cares? You will be dead your kids will be dead, your grand kids, and your grand kids grand kids....


Something else I am sure will be the PLague of the Universe by then

Who cares? You will be dead your kids will be dead, your grand kids, and your grand kids grand kids....


Something else I am sure will be the PLague of the Universe by then