1
   

At this time? Your choice for president?

 
 
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jul, 2007 12:33 pm
@mousy,
Julie Annie
0 Replies
 
Arterion
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jul, 2007 06:33 pm
@mousy,
Mike Gravel
0 Replies
 
Reagaknight
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jul, 2007 08:07 pm
@92b16vx,
92b16vx;26937 wrote:
Actually, a lot of people are going to vote for him, I'd say you are joke, continuing to support the destruction of America through globalist candidate.


If you say so. He's in the CFR, so he's globalist? There are plenty of people in the CFR who are not globalist. And in any case, I'll take a semi-globalist over an isolasionist nut like Paul. Who, BTW, is in the lowest tier of candidates. Splitting something like 3% of GOP primary voters with several others. I know polls are usually not completely accurate, but not so ridiculously so.

Oh, and I'm with Fred(/Newt).

LOL @ Mike Gravel!
92b16vx
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jul, 2007 09:03 pm
@Reagaknight,
Reagaknight;27040 wrote:
I'll take a semi-globalist over an isolasionist nut like Paul.


Please, tell us how little you actually know, or can comprehend about his policies. You prove your ignorance everytime you post gj.
0 Replies
 
Arterion
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jul, 2007 11:06 pm
@Reagaknight,
Reagaknight;27040 wrote:

LOL @ Mike Gravel!


I'm serious!

Hey, that old codger's got a lot of fire. He says what he means, and he doesn't wish-wash around the issues. A straight-talking candidate is a rarity these days, on either side of the fence. He thinks the current democrats are as weaselly and useless as I do. If they really wanted to end the war, or further any other of their pet causes, they could already have done it. If they really didn't like Bush, they would already have brought up a case against him. They're just pandering to anything they think might support them, too afraid of pissing someone off. I hate to break it to them, but no matter what the bill is, passing it is going to piss someone off.
0 Replies
 
Reagaknight
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jul, 2007 08:28 am
@mousy,
92b, you generalize and lie, then I'll genralize. I still think the guy's an isolationist. Also, he likes his pork, and he likes it to go to Texas.
92b16vx
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jul, 2007 11:05 am
@Reagaknight,
Reagaknight;27057 wrote:
92b, you generalize and lie, then I'll genralize. I still think the guy's an isolationist. Also, he likes his pork, and he likes it to go to Texas.


Please feel free to point out my "lies". He voted to go into Afghanistan after 9/11, he always supports real military action, he is not an isolationist, just not a power hungry globalist, too bad you can't comprehend the difference. His job is to his constituents, since he is in Texas, yea, anytime they ask for money, he adds it to spending bills, and if the bill is not constitutional, or too wasteful he votes against it, it called doing his job. I'm sorry you are still being pulled along on the hook, line and sinker.
Dmizer
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jul, 2007 12:32 pm
@mousy,
I vote for Montgomery Brewster!

None of the above!
0 Replies
 
Reagaknight
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jul, 2007 02:55 pm
@92b16vx,
92b16vx;27073 wrote:
Please feel free to point out my "lies". He voted to go into Afghanistan after 9/11, he always supports real military action, he is not an isolationist, just not a power hungry globalist, too bad you can't comprehend the difference. His job is to his constituents, since he is in Texas, yea, anytime they ask for money, he adds it to spending bills, and if the bill is not constitutional, or too wasteful he votes against it, it called doing his job. I'm sorry you are still being pulled along on the hook, line and sinker.


It made him a flip-flopper. He requested funds for extending I-69 into Texas months after writing a piece about how highways were destroying our freedom or some other bile. You would have everyone vote for Ron Paul because you think everyone should agree with you and your idiotic rambling about the CFR.
92b16vx
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jul, 2007 02:59 pm
@Reagaknight,
Reagaknight;27108 wrote:
It made him a flip-flopper. He requested funds for extending I-69 into Texas months after writing a piece about how highways were destroying our freedom or some other bile. You would have everyone vote for Ron Paul because you think everyone should agree with you and your idiotic rambling about the CFR.


Ignorance, please display more.
0 Replies
 
Reagaknight
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jul, 2007 03:02 pm
@mousy,
Okay, how about links?

The NAFTA Superhighway

http://i.cnn.net/cnn/interactive/allpolitics/0706/popup.congress.earmarks/pdfs/tx.14.paul.pdf
92b16vx
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jul, 2007 03:08 pm
@Reagaknight,


Ok, so asking for funding to fix fucked up highways somehow in your ignorant little cosmos equates to wanting funding to build a ten lane superhighway for NAFTA? LOL, thanks, I need a laugh.
0 Replies
 
I Understand
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jul, 2007 03:12 pm
@mousy,
I also will be voting Paul or I will not be voting at all.
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jul, 2007 03:30 pm
@I Understand,
I Understand;27118 wrote:
I also will be voting Paul or I will not be voting at all.


Waste. You're throwing away what little power you have as an individual.:frown:
92b16vx
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jul, 2007 03:34 pm
@Pinochet73,
Pinochet73;27123 wrote:
Waste. You're throwing away what little power you have as an individual.:frown:


No, he is excersicing his right to vote for the person that represents what he wants to see in America. Screw people that toe the party line simply because it's the party line, they are the REAL problem with America. Forcing people to choose between the lesser of two evils is a REAL problem in America, voting for the candidate to lead the greatest nation on earth that represents your own views is NOT a problem in America. Voting for the repub or dem candidate simply because they get the nod is wasting your vote as an indivdual if you do not believe in them.
briansol
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jul, 2007 05:14 pm
@mousy,
i plan to write in ron paul even if he does not make it past the primary. I suggest you all do the same.
0 Replies
 
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jul, 2007 08:14 pm
@92b16vx,
92b16vx;27124 wrote:
No, he is excersicing his right to vote for the person that represents what he wants to see in America. Screw people that toe the party line simply because it's the party line, they are the REAL problem with America. Forcing people to choose between the lesser of two evils is a REAL problem in America, voting for the candidate to lead the greatest nation on earth that represents your own views is NOT a problem in America. Voting for the repub or dem candidate simply because they get the nod is wasting your vote as an indivdual if you do not believe in them.


But that's life in American politics. Sorry. Third-party votes are a waste. I would never throw my vote away. Never.

PS: For the record, only one of the two parties is 'evil' -- the Democrats.
92b16vx
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jul, 2007 08:28 pm
@Pinochet73,
Pinochet73;27162 wrote:
But that's life in American politics. Sorry. Third-party votes are a waste. I would never throw my vote away. Never.

PS: For the record, only one of the two parties is 'evil' -- the Democrats.


I am glad, and support your right to vote for whatever candidate the MSM tells you is good. I think it's a waste of a vote to not vote for a good candidate that believes in America, and Americans rights, because they aren't "popular".

Ona unrelated note, have you ever done any anti narco work in SA?
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jul, 2007 09:05 pm
@92b16vx,
92b16vx;27166 wrote:
I am glad, and support your right to vote for whatever candidate the MSM tells you is good. I think it's a waste of a vote to not vote for a good candidate that believes in America, and Americans rights, because they aren't "popular".

Ona unrelated note, have you ever done any anti narco work in SA?


Yeah.....I did a lot, as an intel analyst. We weren't allowed to directly participate in any kind of interdiction ops, though. We just analyzed the living tar out of Latin America from a modified IPB (Intel Prep of the Battlefield) perspective. That was our bread-and-butter at USSOUTHCOM.:headbang:
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Jul, 2007 08:17 am
@92b16vx,
92b16vx;27124 wrote:
No, he is excersicing his right to vote for the person that represents what he wants to see in America. Screw people that toe the party line simply because it's the party line, they are the REAL problem with America. Forcing people to choose between the lesser of two evils is a REAL problem in America, voting for the candidate to lead the greatest nation on earth that represents your own views is NOT a problem in America. Voting for the repub or dem candidate simply because they get the nod is wasting your vote as an indivdual if you do not believe in them.
Well at least we get to waiste a vote, you on the other hand will be siting at home, or are you going to do like Brian?
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/09/2025 at 04:51:13