Obama Surrenders National Interests to Thugs and Terrorists

Forums: Politics, Political, American Politics
Email this Topic • Print this Page

Jimmy Carter's 2nd term has begun:

The Right-Wing Underground: Obama Surrenders National Interests to Thugs and Terrorists

So the question is, will the "post-partisan" candidate for "change" be able to continue getting away with falsely blaming Republicans for one liberal policy disaster after another, even including his clueless botching of missile defense, typically treasonous negligence on Iran, and total impotence with Pakistan?

Something tells me there will be no "journalists" asking him gotcha questions about whether or not he's made mistakes, reporting how many days it's been since he claimed the surge would never work, or hyperventilating over any vague, useless memos they find when he is done causeing the next 9/11.

Topic Stats
Top Replies
Link to this Topic

Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 855 • Replies: 10

No top replies

@aquapub,

perhaps if you want to ask that question again, except this time without all of the loaded-language.

0 Replies

@aquapub,

aquapub;64153 wrote:

Jimmy Carter's 2nd term has begun:

The Right-Wing Underground: Obama Surrenders National Interests to Thugs and Terrorists

So the question is, will the "post-partisan" candidate for "change" be able to continue getting away with falsely blaming Republicans for one liberal policy disaster after another, even including his clueless botching of missile defense, typically treasonous negligence on Iran, and total impotence with Pakistan?

Something tells me there will be no "journalists" asking him gotcha questions about whether or not he's made mistakes, reporting how many days it's been since he claimed the surge would never work, or hyperventilating over any vague, useless memos they find when he is done causeing the next 9/11.

"typically treasonous negligence on Iran" ???????

I see your bringing up Jimmy Carter ! You ever heard of Iran/Contra ? Reagan and FOX NEWS ANAYLIST :eek: Ollie North selling arms to Iran,to fund the Contras in Latin America.

1 Reply

@scooby-doo cv,

scooby-doo;64196 wrote:

"typically treasonous negligence on Iran" ???????

I see your bringing up Jimmy Carter ! You ever heard of Iran/Contra ? Reagan and FOX NEWS ANAYLIST :eek: Ollie North selling arms to Iran,to fund the Contras in Latin America.

Treasonous? Making deals to save American lives, treasonous?

You may not have agreed with selling arms to the contras, but the effort was to "save" Americans.

Carter never did, Obama never will put Americans first. To hell with both of the leftist bastards.

3 Replies

@g-man,

g-man;64212 wrote:

Treasonous? Making deals to save American lives, treasonous?

By supporting terrorism?

0 Replies

@g-man,

g-man;64212 wrote:

Treasonous? Making deals to save American lives, treasonous?

You may not have agreed with selling arms to the contras, but the effort was to "save" Americans.

Carter never did, Obama never will put Americans first. To hell with both of the leftist bastards.

So why does Obama get a hard time from conservatives & republicans for wanting to sit down face to face with the Iranians and have dialogue.

Unlike Reagan he is not selling Iran (regarded as a "terrorist state" by the US) to funs another "terrorist group" the contra's.

Reagan lied about the Iran/contra affair,and to think the conservative's wanted Clinton impeached for getting a blowjob :lightbulb:

http://http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHXq8TRejow&feature=related

0 Replies

@g-man,

g-man;64212 wrote:

Treasonous? Making deals to save American lives, treasonous?

Define the word "Treason" right now.

1 Reply

@Sabz5150,

Sabz5150;64316 wrote:

Define the word "Treason" right now.

Creating waivers to allow the sale of missile guidance systems to the Chinese who had the nuclear missiles but not the ability to place them in the center of U.S. cities as they now can, and have targeted.

1 Reply

@g-man,

g-man;64358 wrote:

Creating waivers to allow the sale of missile guidance systems to the Chinese who had the nuclear missiles but not the ability to place them in the center of U.S. cities as they now can, and have targeted.

And training the very people that flew planes into our buildings? Do you consider that treason? Of course not, you guys did it.

If you don't think that China has long had the ability to deliver a nuke to any point on the planet, you are sorely mistaken. They bought that technology from Russia quite some time ago. Not to mention their subs...

1 Reply

@Sabz5150,

Sabz5150;64385 wrote:

1. And training the very people that flew planes into our buildings? Do you consider that treason? Of course not, you guys did it.

2. If you don't think that China has long had the ability to deliver a nuke to any point on the planet, you are sorely mistaken. They bought that technology from Russia quite some time ago. Not to mention their subs...

1. The creeps that flew the planes into the wtc took the lessons in florida. They paid for the lessons and bypassed the takeoff and landing lessons. No government trained them. Duh.

2. Wrong. Simply wrong.

1 Reply

@g-man,

g-man;64586 wrote:

1. The creeps that flew the planes into the wtc took the lessons in florida. They paid for the lessons and bypassed the takeoff and landing lessons. No government trained them. Duh.

Government trained Osama and his ilk to keep Russia out of Afghanistan. Remember that? The "pilots" were trained using money send from our GOOD FRIEND Pakistan... and Bandar Bush's wife.

Quote:

2. Wrong. Simply wrong.

Do you even know how the technology works? All you need to do is get a missile into LEO. Once you're there, you are halfway to ANYWHERE. A little math later and you can deliver a warhead to any point on the planet. It's easy as hell.

Didn't the Chinese demonstrate the ability to shoot down a satellite? Didn't they put people into space? I rest my case Smile

0 Replies

Obama Surrenders National Interests to Thugs and Terrorists

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know