1
   

White House's job numbers don't add up

 
 
Reply Sun 5 Nov, 2006 11:49 pm
Republicans brag about jobs that haven't been officially counted.

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) -- When the national unemployment rate falls to a 5-1/2 year low of 4.4%, you'd think the White House wouldn't have to dress up numbers to make their record look good.
But that's what happened on Friday.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that nonfarm payrolls grew by 92,000 in October, while growth in August and September was revised higher. Over the past year, 1.9 million jobs have been added to the payrolls, according to the BLS. See full story.
The White House crowed: "Since August 2003, more than 6.8 million jobs have been created."
Except that's not what the official government figures show -- at least not yet.
According to the establishment survey tabulated by the BLS, payrolls have grown from about 129.8 million in August 2003 to 135.8 million in October. That's a jump of 6 million, or 6.047 million if you want to take it out to the last decimal.
August 2003 was the month payrolls began growing again after two years of layoffs, and it was also just after the 2003 tax cut took effect. The White House has said the tax cut on dividends and capital gains was a major reason for the turnaround in the economy.

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/story.aspx?siteid=mktw&guid=%7BE4CBA9D4-8D73-4C64-94FF-3A934B28E72E%7D

Where did the 6.8 million number come from? Not from the household survey. That survey measures a slightly different set of workers, and it says employment has risen 7.7 million since August 2003.
A spokesman at the Labor Department said the 6.8 million figure reflects an additional 810,000 jobs that the government thinks it missed in earlier estimates to the 6 million that have been actually recorded in the government's books.
---------------------------------------------------------------

I love election year politics when they use fuzzy math.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,128 • Replies: 3
No top replies

 
Brent cv
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Nov, 2006 12:23 am
@tumbleweed cv,
You do what you got to do in politics. Democrats are just as guilty as Republicans. It'll never change. For some reason we all seem to be upset about the corruption but we continue to elect the same Democrats and Republicans back into office each election year.
0 Replies
 
Curmudgeon
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Nov, 2006 07:30 am
@tumbleweed cv,
One solution is plain . Get new people in the government . The problem with that is that all too often , new people become enamored with the power and position and become just like the old people in government .
I mean get in all phases of government , not just national politics . Local city , county , water districts , courts . etc . A change must come from the bottom up .
oleo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Nov, 2006 02:51 pm
@Curmudgeon,
That all is true, and that's why I'm starting to mix a little Libertarianism in
with my liberalism, or whatever. Why should we give them so much power
that they can get corrupted? Let's downsize them.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » White House's job numbers don't add up
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 2.77 seconds on 12/26/2024 at 12:02:52