1
   

Scandals could affect House control

 
 
Reply Thu 2 Nov, 2006 05:22 am
Indictments, investigations and allegations of wrongdoing have helped put at least 15 Republican House seats in jeopardy, enough to swing control to the Democrats on Tuesday even before the larger issues of war, economic unease and President Bush are invoked.

WP: Scandals could affect House control - washingtonpost.com Highlights - MSNBC.com

You dirty buggers.Very Happy

No wonder our country is a mess. The majority in power is a corrupt bunch of criminals. 2 more years of this style of leadership will allow the Democrats to regain full control of both houses and the oval office.

Democrats, get out your tape measures.:beerchug:
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,100 • Replies: 8
No top replies

 
oleo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Nov, 2006 02:56 pm
@tumbleweed cv,
One thing that, to an extent, keeps Democrats more "honest" in office:

The "liberal" press is much more aggressive and vicious with them.
Curmudgeon
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Nov, 2006 11:36 pm
@oleo,
oleo;6247 wrote:
One thing that, to an extent, keeps Democrats more "honest" in office:

The "liberal" press is much more aggressive and vicious with them.



Are you sure about that ? Seems to me the press goes easier on Liberals .

For example , Ried has a sweetheart land deal and rakes in over a million , hides it from congress , and the press goes wild over IM's by Foley , even after he quits his position . Has Reid quit ? Has he even been chastised ?
oleo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Nov, 2006 06:06 pm
@Curmudgeon,
Curmudgeon;6265 wrote:
Are you sure about that ? Seems to me the press goes easier on Liberals .

For example , Ried has a sweetheart land deal and rakes in over a million , hides it from congress , and the press goes wild over IM's by Foley , even after he quits his position . Has Reid quit ? Has he even been chastised ?


Let me ask you this, on every other channel but Fox news, and every type
of outlet in the country... what determines what gets covered? Interest!
If people are interested in the story it gets ratings and hits and money is
made as a result.

Fox News has cornered the market on the hardcore Dem haters. There all
there, not watching CNN. So, stories like that pop up, Reid gives his side
of the story, nobody cares, it goes away. Why people aren't up in arms about
William Jefferson is beyond me, but the public doesn't seem to bite on the story.

The Foley story is a juicy one, because it has sex, a slight amount of
pederasty, intrigue, a who didn't dunnit when they knew about it subplot,
and a dose of hypocritical come-uppence. People enjoy it as entertainment,
which is what news has become.

Look, if Fox hatches some story, and it actually pulls in viewers the rest
trip over themselves to do the same story, regardless of whether it's
distorted or not.

The "liberal press" has gotten tough with the adminsitration... NOW. Now
that it rings true with the mainstream audience, and they get the numbers
and sell commercials. The adminsitration was treated with kid gloves by
the press before that...

Reps screw up much bigger, and a little more glamorously, than Dems.
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Nov, 2006 09:27 pm
@oleo,
oleo;6247 wrote:
One thing that, to an extent, keeps Democrats more "honest" in office:

The "liberal" press is much more aggressive and vicious with them.

Sure Pal!
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Nov, 2006 09:30 pm
@oleo,
oleo;6282 wrote:
Let me ask you this, on every other channel but Fox news, and every type
of outlet in the country... what determines what gets covered? Interest!
If people are interested in the story it gets ratings and hits and money is
made as a result.

Fox News has cornered the market on the hardcore Dem haters. There all
there, not watching CNN. So, stories like that pop up, Reid gives his side
of the story, nobody cares, it goes away. Why people aren't up in arms about
William Jefferson is beyond me, but the public doesn't seem to bite on the story.

The Foley story is a juicy one, because it has sex, a slight amount of
pederasty, intrigue, a who didn't dunnit when they knew about it subplot,
and a dose of hypocritical come-uppence. People enjoy it as entertainment,
which is what news has become.

Look, if Fox hatches some story, and it actually pulls in viewers the rest
trip over themselves to do the same story, regardless of whether it's
distorted or not.

The "liberal press" has gotten tough with the adminsitration... NOW. Now
that it rings true with the mainstream audience, and they get the numbers
and sell commercials. The adminsitration was treated with kid gloves by
the press before that...

Reps screw up much bigger, and a little more glamorously, than Dems.
One word. Kennedy.
0 Replies
 
markx15
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Nov, 2006 09:44 pm
@tumbleweed cv,
I bet your have been just iching to say that for quite a while haven't you drnaline.
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Nov, 2006 10:24 pm
@tumbleweed cv,
Rarely does one word/name incure a full meaning without having to give a definition. It just goes to prove that there is always someone worse. Regardless of party.
0 Replies
 
markx15
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Nov, 2006 03:21 am
@tumbleweed cv,
point taken.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Scandals could affect House control
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 12/26/2024 at 12:07:56