@cranston36 cv,
From the CDC, as of [SIZE="4"]APRIL 12, 2006.[/SIZE]
CDC wrote:As of April 12, 2006, 605 suspect, probable and confirmed cases have been reported to the Iowa Department of Public Health (IDPH) (IDPH, unpublished data).
From FoxNews as of [SIZE="4"]APRIL 20, 2006.[/SIZE]
From this article:
FOXNews.com - Mumps Outbreak Spreads in Midwest, More Vaccine Promised - Health News | Current Health News | Medical News
FoxNews wrote:More than 800 of the cases are in Iowa. The CDC has pledged to provide 25,000 doses of measles-mumps-rubella vaccine to the state from the agency's stockpile.
FoxNews wrote:"On one hand, given the 800-plus cases we have, this is a serious situation," Teale said. "On the same token, we have 2.8 million people in Iowa, so the relative risk of any single visitor getting mumps is extremely low."
(Kevin Teale is a spokesman for the Iowa Department of Public Health)
From this article:
FOXNews.com - Iowa to Open Mumps Vaccination Clinics for Young Adults - Health News | Current Health News | Medical News
FoxNews wrote:As of Thursday, Iowa had 975 cases of probable, confirmed and suspected cases, said Dr. Patricia Quinlisk, the state epidemiologist.
(epidemiology is the branch of medicine that deals with the study of the causes, distribution, and control of disease in populations)
How do you figure that the spokesman for the Iowa Department of Public Health and the state epidemiologist are not to be considered as "directly [from] the source"? In fact, the wording from the CDC document and from the state epidemiologist are very very similar. :scratchchin: And one is more recent than the other! :lightbulb: