Reply
Wed 15 Feb, 2006 08:14 pm
Michigan, like many other states, is wrestling with the problem of birth control.
Like it or not, less children are being born into American families and the increase in population throughout the United States is not caused by domestic harmony and prosperity but by immigration.
The population of the United States is growing because of the influx of people moving to live here.
The problem that has surfaced in Michigan, and other states, is about insurance.
Should insurance companies pay for birth control by including it in their care offerings?
Many people say they should not have to pay.
Some say that the insurance companies should not be forced to pay for birth control.
A friend of mine said to me today, however, something that made me pause to think.
She said many insurance companies offer benefits to pay for Viagra.
What does this do?
It puts an artificial sex drive into men who are then driven to rape and abuse.
In that case, why not provide health benefits that pay for birth control.
Everyone knows that drugs are priced artificially high and insurance companies, at least health insurance companies, act no better than legalized loan sharks.
Why penalize women and give men an advantage that will lead to more abuse and unwanted pregnancies?
That is why I believe that if insurance companies pay for dried up old men to have erections then they should provide benefits to young women who do not want to be impregnated by these monsters.
@cranston36 cv,
Insurance paying for Viagra is RETARDED`
@cranston36 cv,
cranston36 wrote:Michigan, like many other states, is wrestling with the problem of birth control.
Like it or not, less children are being born into American families and the increase in population throughout the United States is not caused by domestic harmony and prosperity but by immigration.
The population of the United States is growing because of the influx of people moving to live here.
The problem that has surfaced in Michigan, and other states, is about insurance.
Should insurance companies pay for birth control by including it in their care offerings?
Many people say they should not have to pay.
Some say that the insurance companies should not be forced to pay for birth control.
A friend of mine said to me today, however, something that made me pause to think.
She said many insurance companies offer benefits to pay for Viagra.
What does this do?
It puts an artificial sex drive into men who are then driven to rape and abuse.
In that case, why not provide health benefits that pay for birth control.
Everyone knows that drugs are priced artificially high and insurance companies, at least health insurance companies, act no better than legalized loan sharks.
Why penalize women and give men an advantage that will lead to more abuse and unwanted pregnancies?
That is why I believe that if insurance companies pay for dried up old men to have erections then they should provide benefits to young women who do not want to be impregnated by these monsters.
This sounds like a editorial from a newpaper.Men who take viagra are rapist and abusers? Come on now, thats not true. Post a link to show where this information comes from.
@cranston36 cv,
^ Exactly my thoughts. I need some data on that "fact."
@cranston36 cv,
This just pisses me off... they won't pay for me to have lasik surgery but they will pay for a 90 year old man to get a hard on
@cranston36 cv,
We should focus on giving more americans their necessary medication and not viagra.
@cranston36 cv,
****, i want my taxes back if it's paying for grandpa joseph to get his dick up.
@cranston36 cv,
Your taxes go to more earmarks then any amount of viagra they could give free.