Bozell Column: Tom DeLay vs. Matt Lauer

Bozell Column: Tom DeLay vs. Matt Lauer | NewsBusters.org

Bozell Column: Tom DeLay vs. Matt Lauer | NewsBusters.org

Ann Curry chimed in, wondering "how does this specter of hypocrisy affect the Party?"

For anyone who questions the demand and the popularity of Fox News, look no further! If you think Fox News is not "fair and balanced", fine. But acknowledge that its existence at least helps to balance out TV news reporting overall, especially with Today show passing off Matt Lauer's and Ann Curry's skewed opinions as "hard news".

Please! It's not as if they had an ax to grind. And Fox Noise is not only too far right..it's off the charts right....anytime you have nothing, nothing, nothing to say negative about President Immaculate...then you know something is up.

You do not know. I say this with confidence. YOU...DO...NOT....KNOW.

You do not watch Fox News because the far left blogs that you read (your selective sources, catered to far left haters like you) tell you that it is far right. True, it is about the only television news outlet that provides positive reports on the President. But with the positive, you also get the negative on Fox News:

Where you get Hannity (mostly pro-Bush), you get the counter from Colmes (mostly anti-Bush). Where you get Kirsten Power (mostly anti-Bush), you get the counter from Michelle Malkin (mostly pro-Bush). Where you get Bernie Goldbert (mostly pro-Bush), you get the counter from Jane Hall (mostly anti-Bush).

I know this because I watch it. Again, you don't watch it so you don't know. I also watch the skewed reporting of the left-leaning networks like NBC, so I see the contrast. And Fox News does not come off as biased in comparison.

Argue with me if you actually watch it, but please refrain from using this as a confidence booster to tell everyone here how sophisticated you are. That bit is tired.

Ok...you know what? I live on Planet Earth..
Who owns Fox News and outlets? Rupert Murdoch...and you think he is agendaless?`
How "fair and balanced" is Fox' "fair and balanced, is the question that has to be asked. Not much. When you have an agenda, as Murdoch has, you're goint to micro-manage every comma and every period, as not to defeat your intentions....it's borne out , every broadcast day.

When you go as far as to pay some minority rube, to espouse your point of view, when it clearly, violates their interests and their humanity, then you are capable of much. No accountability of self, but all accountability of everyone else....Give me a break...give me two.

You still don't know. It's all hearsay and speculation.

Why? Because I said it...and your word is supposed to be gospel?

No, because I watch it and you don't watch it. Therefore, I have a better idea of the content of their coverage. I cannot believe I have to spell that out for you. Good Lord!