1
   

Surge Derangement Syndrome Grips MSM and Liberals

 
 
Reply Fri 10 Aug, 2007 08:10 am
Surge Derangement Syndrome Grips MSM and Liberals | NewsBusters.org

With the success of the surge in Iraq becoming more evident with each passing day, a new ailment has gripped the Mainstream Media and the liberals: Surge Derangement Sydrome (SDS). The earliest known case of SDS occurred on April 23 when Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid responded to a question by CNN's congressional correspondent Dana Bash of whether he would believe General David Petraeus if he reported that the "so-called surge" is working:

REID: No, I don't believe him, because it's not happening. All you have to do is look at the facts.


Well, as we do look at the facts that the surge is working, the MSM and the liberals are showing more signs of severe SDS. Some of these SDS signs have been noted in the August 9 edition of Investor's Business Daily, 'Surge' Critics Perhaps Were Bit Premature:

Do Democratic opposition leaders keep blaming each other for voting for the Iraq War? Or are they now talking about expanding military operations to other countries?

Sen. Hillary Clinton once was damned for voting to authorize the war in Iraq. But her even-more-liberal rival Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., now expresses his own willingness to invade nuclear Islamic Pakistan.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 923 • Replies: 8
No top replies

 
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Aug, 2007 10:49 am
@Drnaline,
Drnaline;29975 wrote:
Surge Derangement Syndrome Grips MSM and Liberals | NewsBusters.org

With the success of the surge in Iraq becoming more evident with each passing day, a new ailment has gripped the Mainstream Media and the liberals: Surge Derangement Sydrome (SDS). The earliest known case of SDS occurred on April 23 when Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid responded to a question by CNN's congressional correspondent Dana Bash of whether he would believe General David Petraeus if he reported that the "so-called surge" is working:

REID: No, I don't believe him, because it's not happening. All you have to do is look at the facts.


Well, as we do look at the facts that the surge is working, the MSM and the liberals are showing more signs of severe SDS. Some of these SDS signs have been noted in the August 9 edition of Investor's Business Daily, 'Surge' Critics Perhaps Were Bit Premature:

Do Democratic opposition leaders keep blaming each other for voting for the Iraq War? Or are they now talking about expanding military operations to other countries?

Sen. Hillary Clinton once was damned for voting to authorize the war in Iraq. But her even-more-liberal rival Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., now expresses his own willingness to invade nuclear Islamic Pakistan.


Well, you know I want us to stay in Iraq, and keep killing bad guys. BUT.....as an ex-soldier, I have to agree with scumbag, butt-wipe Reid on this. A general isn't going to say anything contradictory to his boss, who in this case is GW. How do you think officers become generals, in the first place? MASSIVE SUCKING UP, over a long, long, long period. Generals are some of the most sychophantic pricks in the military. I never liked or trusted any of them. They're all master root-suckers.:thumbdown:

PS: Harry The Hose-Monster Reid sucks, hard, low, long and slow, regardless.
0 Replies
 
Silverchild79
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Aug, 2007 11:11 am
@Drnaline,
it's becoming more and more obvious that the surge is working though, all political posturing aside

and according to some recent polls support for the war is actually on an up trend
92b16vx
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Aug, 2007 01:21 pm
@Drnaline,
The only way "the surge" is going to work is if the Iraqis come in behind it and continue to hold the extended freedom from the removal of the enemy. If they do not, then we can continue to have surges till hell freezes over, and it will do no REAL good other than killing bad guys. Iraq has to become responsible for it's own destiny, or it WILL fail, no matter how well we do.
0 Replies
 
Silverchild79
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Aug, 2007 01:27 pm
@Drnaline,
the incread activity of the surge also provides Iraqi security forces with valuable trigger time increasing their operational experience and steeling thier nerve as a unit
92b16vx
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Aug, 2007 02:44 pm
@Silverchild79,
Silverchild79;30038 wrote:
the incread activity of the surge also provides Iraqi security forces with valuable trigger time increasing their operational experience and steeling thier nerve as a unit


Which is great, if the future of the country is a military dictatorship. The government and the people have to put aside the secular differences and work towards a national good. They need strong troops to do that, but strong troops alone is not going to cure their ills.
0 Replies
 
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Aug, 2007 02:56 pm
@Silverchild79,
Silverchild79;30019 wrote:
it's becoming more and more obvious that the surge is working though, all political posturing aside

and according to some recent polls support for the war is actually on an up trend


That's cool, but nobody should hold his breath waiting for The Petraeus Report. It's going to say whatever GW wants it to. Generals are usually about as useful as tits on a taco.:no: :no: :no: :no:
0 Replies
 
rhopper3
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Aug, 2007 04:09 pm
@Drnaline,
It doesn't bother me that so many conservatives are in favor of this idiotic war...Its the refusal to look at any part of it with a critical eye...The surge has not been a success unless we have been watching different news casts somehow...The Iraqi government is not more stable and the insurgents have not been defeated just moved away from Baghdad...Patreaus is an honest guy and will likely report a military victory....and well duh
of course we are kicking the insurgents ass when we engage them that was never in doubt of course they back away from engaging professional soldiers and marines that was never in doubt either ......but Baghdad (I can never get the spelling right darn it) is no longer the real problem
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Aug, 2007 06:14 pm
@rhopper3,
rhopper3;30090 wrote:
It doesn't bother me that so many conservatives are in favor of this idiotic war...Its the refusal to look at any part of it with a critical eye...The surge has not been a success unless we have been watching different news casts somehow...The Iraqi government is not more stable and the insurgents have not been defeated just moved away from Baghdad...Patreaus is an honest guy and will likely report a military victory....and well duh
of course we are kicking the insurgents ass when we engage them that was never in doubt of course they back away from engaging professional soldiers and marines that was never in doubt either ......but Baghdad (I can never get the spelling right darn it) is no longer the real problem


That's the way most counter-guerrilla wars go. This one isn't much different. We'll leave someday, in the distant future, when new forces surface in our politics and culture and drive us out.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Surge Derangement Syndrome Grips MSM and Liberals
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.18 seconds on 05/04/2024 at 11:12:02