1
   

PATRIOT PERSPECTIVE Ron Paul?The libertarian Republican

 
 
Reply Fri 10 Aug, 2007 11:44 am
The Digest, Patriot Post Vol. 07 No. 32 - Published 10 August 2007

If there is one man who elicits a strong response across the gamut of GOP constituencies, it is Texas Republican congressman and presidential candidate Dr. Ron Paul. Because he is a genuine libertarian, Paul has been a gadfly to liberals and conservatives alike since his first election in Texas to the U.S. House in 1976, and his long-time presence in the GOP is an anomaly that deserves attention.

Ron Paul, a ten-term congressman, small-town doctor, retired Air Force officer and great-grandfather is, indisputably, a gentleman. In a legislative body where integrity seems an increasingly rare quality, Paul?s is unquestioned. Not content merely to condemn unconstitutional taxes and expenditures, every year Dr. Paul returns a portion of his congressional office budget to the U.S. Treasury. In his medical practice, Paul refused to accept Medicare payments on principle. Recently dubbed ?the most radical congressman in America? by a New York Times Magazine feature article, Ron Paul?s ?radicalism,? clearly, is made of different stuff.

Contrary to Congress? dreams of ever-increasing power, Dr. Paul?s congressional career is laced with legislation that seeks to reduce the size and scope of the federal government. During his first stint in the House (1976-1984), Paul served on the House Banking Committee, where he was an outspoken critic of the Federal Reserve policies of the era. From that time forward he has sponsored bills and voted to reduce and eliminate federal taxes, as well as federal spending and regulation.

________________________

Somes up my thoughts on the man. Click for the rest.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,064 • Replies: 9
No top replies

 
92b16vx
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Aug, 2007 05:48 pm
@Drnaline,
So, you like him now? Or did you quote the wrong part of the article?
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Aug, 2007 08:44 am
@Drnaline,
I never said i hated the guy. IMO he will not garner enough support untill he changes his war policy. If he'd do that he would probably have a hell of a chance? As it stands he is an also ran.
0 Replies
 
Crito
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Aug, 2007 10:55 pm
@Drnaline,
Wouldn't it be great if once Billary and Giuliani are officially ordained as their party's nominee, -- after enough pseudo-debates to convince the people there was something democratic about the process, of course -- Obama and Ron Paul broke away from their respective parties and ran together, on the same ticket? It'd be one heck of a political coup! Yeah, I know... I can dream though, can't I? Wink
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Aug, 2007 08:23 am
@Drnaline,
Yeah , you can dream but when you do it's a doozy, LOL.
0 Replies
 
92b16vx
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Aug, 2007 08:27 am
@Drnaline,
If Ron Paul runs as an idependent, we would get a ton of votes, but would not win, or even come close. As the Rupublican nominee he will get those that want him, and all the party loyalist, who do not want Hitlery, as well as some of the middle to upper class democrats that don't want to see their wealth distributed, the wing-nuts, and fringe that wouldn't normally vote.
0 Replies
 
Crito
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Aug, 2007 08:41 am
@Drnaline,
The reason he wouldn't win is because the law limits individual campaign contributions and forces everyone to donate to Democans and Republicrats whether they want to or not. Federal (taxpayer) matching campaign funds is about as anti-democratic a concept as you can get. All of you WILL contribute to Billary's and Giulliani's campaigns!
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Aug, 2007 08:47 am
@Drnaline,
Quote:
All of you WILL contribute to Billary's and Giulliani's campaigns!
Wanna bet?
0 Replies
 
Crito
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Aug, 2007 09:00 am
@Drnaline,
You pay taxes don't you? Then sure, I'll bet. Wish I could refuse to check a little $3 box on my income tax return and not have to contribute, but it really doesn't work that way.
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Aug, 2007 10:28 am
@Drnaline,
Taxes IMO doesn't constitute conscience donations. That's like saying because you pay taxes you must support the war.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » PATRIOT PERSPECTIVE Ron Paul?The libertarian Republican
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/07/2026 at 05:49:37