1
   

Talk about obstruction.

 
 
Reply Mon 30 Jul, 2007 07:05 am
Schumer to fight new Bush high court picks

New York Sen. Charles E. Schumer, a powerful member of the Democratic leadership, said Friday the Senate should not confirm another U.S. Supreme Court nominee under President Bush ?except in extraordinary circumstances.?

?We should reverse the presumption of confirmation,? Schumer told the American Constitution Society convention in Washington. ?The Supreme Court is dangerously out of balance. We cannot afford to see Justice Stevens replaced by another Roberts, or Justice Ginsburg by another Alito.?

Schumer?s assertion comes as Democrats and liberal advocacy groups are increasingly complaining that the Supreme Court with Bush?s nominees ? Chief Justice John Roberts and Associate Justice Samuel A. Alito ? has moved quicker than expected to overturn legal precedents.

?There is no doubt that we were hoodwinked,? said Schumer, who sits on the Senate Judiciary Committee and heads the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee.
________________________

Hoodwinked by a chimp again, LOL.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 846 • Replies: 5
No top replies

 
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Jul, 2007 09:30 am
@Drnaline,
Drnaline;28391 wrote:
Schumer to fight new Bush high court picks

New York Sen. Charles E. Schumer, a powerful member of the Democratic leadership, said Friday the Senate should not confirm another U.S. Supreme Court nominee under President Bush ?except in extraordinary circumstances.?

?We should reverse the presumption of confirmation,? Schumer told the American Constitution Society convention in Washington. ?The Supreme Court is dangerously out of balance. We cannot afford to see Justice Stevens replaced by another Roberts, or Justice Ginsburg by another Alito.?

Schumer?s assertion comes as Democrats and liberal advocacy groups are increasingly complaining that the Supreme Court with Bush?s nominees ? Chief Justice John Roberts and Associate Justice Samuel A. Alito ? has moved quicker than expected to overturn legal precedents.

?There is no doubt that we were hoodwinked,? said Schumer, who sits on the Senate Judiciary Committee and heads the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee.
________________________

Hoodwinked by a chimp again, LOL.


Schumer is a scoundrel, working his butt off, again, to hurt America. GW has appointed nothing but top-quality Justices. I didn't support his effort to appoint the chick from Texas, though. I thought that was ill-advised, but the others are top-flight. GO, BUSH, GO!!!!!!:thumbup: Very Happy Very Happy :thumbup:
aaronssongs
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Jul, 2007 11:33 am
@Pinochet73,
Pinochet73;28419 wrote:
Schumer is a scoundrel, working his butt off, again, to hurt America. GW has appointed nothing but top-quality Justices. I didn't support his effort to appoint the chick from Texas, though. I thought that was ill-advised, but the others are top-flight. GO, BUSH, GO!!!!!!:thumbup: Very Happy Very Happy :thumbup:


Bush appointed what amounted to ideological Neanderthals...we don't need to turn time back to Jim Crow, and pre-civil rights era...we need to be progressive in our thinking and our legislation, that insures the rights of all, including those considered, "the other"....and preserve a woman's right to choose....now, if you want to legislate concerning your own sexual organs, that's one thing...but where does a man get off telling a woman what she can or cannot do with her own body? Why don't you get a mandatory vasectomy, despite the fact that you're probably shooting blanks, anyway...but, just go ahead and get one for good measure....Don't feel so good , being told what to do, do it?
Ever heard of reciprocity...if not...pull out a dictionary, and don't be troubled by the big words.....LOL
aaronssongs
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Jul, 2007 11:36 am
@Drnaline,
Schumer to fight new Bush high court picks,
and well, he should....how dare the court be slanted, precipitously, to the right.
0 Replies
 
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Jul, 2007 02:43 pm
@aaronssongs,
aaronssongs;28471 wrote:
Bush appointed what amounted to ideological Neanderthals...we don't need to turn time back to Jim Crow, and pre-civil rights era...we need to be progressive in our thinking and our legislation, that insures the rights of all, including those considered, "the other"....and preserve a woman's right to choose....now, if you want to legislate concerning your own sexual organs, that's one thing...but where does a man get off telling a woman what she can or cannot do with her own body? Why don't you get a mandatory vasectomy, despite the fact that you're probably shooting blanks, anyway...but, just go ahead and get one for good measure....Don't feel so good , being told what to do, do it?
Ever heard of reciprocity...if not...pull out a dictionary, and don't be troubled by the big words.....LOL



No worries. I'm not troubled by your total lack of punctuation (ha, ha), or Scooby's, for that matter. I figure if I can make sense out your frantic scribbling and his Scottish gibber-jabber, I can decipher just about anything. :wave2: Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing :wave2:
0 Replies
 
Curmudgeon
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Jul, 2007 12:15 am
@Drnaline,
What's new about the opposition party attempting to stop a President's nominations to the Supreme Court? This is business as usual, and both sides have always done it. BIG DEAL!
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Talk about obstruction.
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/07/2026 at 04:07:49