1
   

Purple fingers for Freedom.

 
 
Reply Fri 9 Dec, 2005 04:19 pm
http://www.purplefingerforfreedom.org/BennettLetter.htmwww.purplefingerforfreedom.org

__________________

I for one will be sporting the purple V from the 12th to the 15th.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,560 • Replies: 13
No top replies

 
ndjs
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Dec, 2005 05:27 pm
@Drnaline,
sounds good, but i don't see a practical reason for it. They'll never know we have our fingers stained purple..
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Dec, 2005 09:59 pm
@Drnaline,
There is a place where you can send in a pic if you like, they will post it. I do it more for our troops here and over there. My wife works for the National Guard.
0 Replies
 
ndjs
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Dec, 2005 02:57 pm
@Drnaline,
oh, alright. i see then.
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 Dec, 2005 11:16 pm
@Drnaline,
http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=worldNews&storyID=2005-12-11T110330Z_01_FOR139522_RTRUKOC_0_US-IRAQ-ELECTION-INSURGENTS.xml&archived=False

FALLUJA/RAMADI Iraq (Reuters) - Saddam Hussein loyalists who violently opposed January elections have made an about-face as Thursday's polls near, urging fellow Sunni Arabs to vote and warning al Qaeda militants not to attack.
In a move unthinkable in the bloody run-up to the last election, guerrillas in the western insurgent heartland of Anbar province say they are even prepared to protect voting stations from fighters loyal to Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, leader of al Qaeda in Iraq.

Graffiti calling for holy war is now hard to find.

Instead, election campaign posters dominate buildings in the rebel strongholds of Ramadi and nearby Falluja, where Sunnis staged a boycott or were too scared to vote last time around.

click for the rest
0 Replies
 
ndjs
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 Dec, 2005 11:33 pm
@Drnaline,
I feel so sorry for those people.
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Jan, 2006 09:58 am
@Drnaline,
Bush cost me my job, my kids and my houses

Thank you for giving me the opportunity to speak my mind. I lost my job this
past year. When Clinton was president I was secure and prosperous, but in
the last year, we had to close our operations. We simply could not compete
with foreign labor.

This foreign labor worked for low pay under very bad conditions. They worked
very long shifts, and many even died on the job. This competition could
hardly be called "fair." I was forced out of the place where I had worked
for 34 years. Not a single government program was there to help me.

How can Bush call himself "compassionate?" Far worse, I lost two of my sons
in Bush's evil war in Iraq. They gave their lives for their country, and for
what? So that Bush's oil buddies can get rich. My pain of losing my sons is
indescribable. While it is trivial next to the loss of my sons, I regret to
say that I also lost my home. I simply have nothing left. How can Bush call
himself a Christian when he neglects people like me? I am a senior citizen
with various medical problems. I'm not in a position where I can begin a new
career. I was reduced to the point where I had to live in a hole in a
ground, all because of President Bush.

And when the authorities found me there, did they have any compassion for my
misfortune and ailments? No, I was arrested. Mr. Bush, I dare you to look me
in the face and tell me you are a compassionate man! I dare you to look me
in the face and tell me you are a Christian. If I had any money left, I
would donate it to the Democrat Party.

If Al Gore had been elected in 2000 I would still have a job, a home, and
most importantly, my dear sons!

Regards,

Saddam Hussein
0 Replies
 
ndjs
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Jan, 2006 11:50 am
@Drnaline,
we had a teacher read this in class like the first day of class last semester.

It was kinda funny, cuz a lot of us were like great... another bush hater for a teacher...
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Jan, 2006 12:31 pm
@Drnaline,
I thought the same thing.
0 Replies
 
Robodoon
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Jan, 2006 04:35 pm
@Drnaline,
Drnaline wrote:
http://www.purplefingerforfreedom.org/BennettLetter.htmwww.purplefingerforfreedom.org

__________________

I for one will be sporting the purple V from the 12th to the 15th.
A common passion or interest will, in almost every case, be felt by a majority of the whole; a communication and concert result from the form of government itself; and there is nothing to check the inducements to sacrifice the weaker party or an obnoxious individual. Hence it is that such democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths. Theoretic politicians, who have patronized this species of government, have erroneously supposed that by reducing mankind to a perfect equality in their political rights, they would, at the same time, be perfectly equalized and assimilated in their possessions, their opinions, and their passions.


http://www.law.ou.edu/hist/federalist/

"Those who hope that we shall move away from the socialist path will be greatly disappointed. Every part of our program of perestroika...is fully based on the principle of more socialism and more democracy."
Mikhail Gorbachev Perestroika - New Thinking for Our Country and the World 1988

More socialism means more democracy, openness and collectivism in everyday life..."
Mikhail Gorbachev Perestroika - New Thinking for Our Country and the World 1988

Gorby is helping Agenda 21, he works out of a 2 billion dollar piece of US land that American citizens my find hard to visit.

"...I would like to be clearly understood...we, the Soviet people, are for socialism.... We want more socialism and, therefore, more democracy."
Mikhail Gorbachev Perestroika - New Thinking for Our Country and the World 1988

"Socialism has a bad name in America, and no amount of wishful thinking on the part of the left is going to change that.... The words Economic Democracy are an adequate and effective replacement."
Derek Shearer cited in Reason 1982



"If we do not follow the dictates of our inner moral compass and stand up for human life, then his lawlessness will threaten the peace and democracy of the emerging new world order we now see, this long dreamed-of vision we've all worked toward for so long."

President George Bush (January 1991)

The "new world order that is in the making must focus on the creation of a world of democracy, peace and prosperity for all."

Nelson Mandela, in The Philadelphia Inquirer (October 1994)


"It's my conviction that the human race has entered a stage where we are all dependent on each other. No other country or nation should be regarded in total separation from another, let alone pitted against another. That's what our communist vocabulary calls internationalism and it means promoting universal human values."
Mikhail Gorbachev Perestroika - New Thinking for Our Country and the World 1988


"... when the struggle seems to be drifting definitely towards a world social democracy, there may still be very great delays and disappointments before it becomes an efficient and beneficent world system. Countless people ... will hate the new world order ... and will die protesting against it. When we attempt to evaluate its promise, we have to bear in mind the distress of a generation or so of malcontents, many of them quite gallant and graceful-looking people."

H. G. Wells, in his book entitled The New World Order (1939)
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Jan, 2006 08:18 pm
@Drnaline,
Quote:
We aren't spreading freedom, we are spreading UN slavery and our founding fathers of America HATED DEMOCRACY


And you have prrof right?

Quote:
Is America a Republic or a Democracy?


Republic.

Quote:
I know it as a Republic…but I’m told by leaders and when I was in school and on my Nightly News today….that this is a Democracy.


Ok you heard the same **** i heard.

Quote:
But why would I think this was a Republic and not a Democracy?
Certainly the ideas of democracy dwell within a Republic…but the ideas of a Republic do not dwell within a Democracy. ( or maybe I don’t understand )



You understand. Your just a little demented in your interpritation.

Quote:
Where has this confusion come from? Why do some of us have a problem with this…can’t we all just get along…

but


Has the Definition of Democracy been changed over the years?


YUP.

Quote:

Has the Definition of Democracy been changed over the years?

- Democracy
A goverment of the masses.
Authority derived through mass meeting or any other form of 'direct' expression.
Results in mobocracy.
Attitude toward property is communistic - negating property rights.
Attitude toward law is that the will of the majority shall regulate,... without restraint or regard to consequences.
Results in demagogism, license, agitation, discontent, anarchy.
Army Training Manual Concerning Citizenship 1928

And the Words of old wisdom (FEDERALIST PAPERS)
From this view of the subject it may be concluded that a pure democracy, by which I mean a society consisting of a small number of citizens, who assemble and administer the government in person, can admit of no cure for the mischiefs of faction. A common passion or interest will, in almost every case, be felt by a majority of the whole; a communication and concert result from the form of government itself; and there is nothing to check the inducements to sacrifice the weaker party or an obnoxious individual. Hence it is that such democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths. Theoretic politicians, who have patronized this species of government, have erroneously supposed that by reducing mankind to a perfect equality in their political rights, they would, at the same time, be perfectly equalized and assimilated in their possessions, their opinions, and their passions.


Tell me something i don't know? You seemed to be caught up in old world as opposed to the new? How much you get paid for these commercials? Got anything newer then 94?
0 Replies
 
Brent cv
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Jan, 2006 08:32 pm
@Drnaline,
This guy is a character lemme tell you
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Jan, 2006 08:56 pm
@Drnaline,
Six of one and half a dozen of the other. Either way he is a few short, LOL
0 Replies
 
ndjs
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jan, 2006 01:21 am
@Drnaline,
that's a whole lot of words just to be playing games with them.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Purple fingers for Freedom.
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/26/2024 at 10:16:48