1
   

Is the US by the people and for the people or?

 
 
au1929
 
Reply Sat 22 Nov, 2003 08:09 am
The US has been said to be a nation of the people, by the people and for the people.
It would seem to me that under the president administration that statement should be changed to:
A nation of the people, by the special interests and for the special interests or perhaps,
of the people, by the wealthy and for the wealthy.

After reading what I had just written and thinking it over. I couldn't help but wonder has it ever been different? Has it? What is your opinion?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 797 • Replies: 8
No top replies

 
fishin
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Nov, 2003 08:17 am
What it is tis always been.

The very first "special interest" was the white male landowner - the Constitution was written just for them. Wink
0 Replies
 
waynewan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Nov, 2003 10:53 am
I agree with you
0 Replies
 
Suzette
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Nov, 2003 11:25 am
I also agree.

That which we were taught in our history schoolbooks was the 'history of the victor', as is always the way.

The problem is that as children, most of us believed it. That makes for a whole lotta cognitive dissonance as we grow up and open our eyes...
0 Replies
 
pistoff
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Nov, 2003 04:59 pm
By the Wealthy and for the Wealthy.
It is called and Oligarchy. Democracy is a fairly tale.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Nov, 2003 02:05 am
Those who have the gold make the rules, folks.

Machiavelli is laughing in his grave.
0 Replies
 
RicardoTizon
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Nov, 2003 02:15 am
Lightwizard's golden rule may have been the norm in the U.S.
Here in the Philippines we have the "mob rules" he who can mobilized the biggest number of protestors or rallyist wins. So far this is how close they can get to "by the people"
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Nov, 2003 02:40 am
That's the classic illusion that those in power will in some distorted duty justify their decisions as being right for the rest of us. They are guessing and they think their illusions can fool us as effectively as a if they are performing a David Copperfield show or selling us a used car. If you want to get down to the nitty gritty it is talentless political motivation.
Dubya fits this mold perfectly.

Let me tell you something I believe -- they are amateurs and they are convincing only to other amateurs.
0 Replies
 
SkisOnFire
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Nov, 2003 02:56 am
Shove the people,
buy the people,
poor the people.

Keep them in chains where they can feel safe and secure.
When someone is free and without great neediness
there's no way to profit from them or gain any power.

Business as usual.
"Freedom" is the best slogan ever devised
to harness peoples' minds.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Is the US by the people and for the people or?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/22/2024 at 03:59:13