1
   

Democrats Reject Key 9/11 Panel Suggestion

 
 
Reply Thu 30 Nov, 2006 11:05 pm
Neither Party Has an Appetite for Overhauling Congressional Oversight of Intelligence

By Jonathan Weisman
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, November 30, 2006; A07

Washingtonpost.com

"It was a solemn pledge, repeated by Democratic leaders and candidates over and over: If elected to the majority in Congress, Democrats would implement all of the recommendations of the bipartisan commission that examined the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001."

"But with control of Congress now secured, Democratic leaders have decided for now against implementing the one measure that would affect them most directly: a wholesale reorganization of Congress to improve oversight and funding of the nation's intelligence agencies. Instead, Democratic leaders may create a panel to look at the issue and produce recommendations, according to congressional aides and lawmakers.

Because plans for implementing the commission's recommendations are still fluid, Democratic officials would not speak for the record. But aides on the House and Senate appropriations, armed services and intelligence committees confirmed this week that a reorganization of Congress would not be part of the package of homeland-security changes up for passage in the "first 100 hours" of the Democratic Congress."

So , not only has Pelosi failed to get her first two commitee appointments , but the Democrats are unable to live up to other promises to their voters . They got plenty of votes by promising to overhaul Congress and put integrity back in vogue , but seem unwilling to live up to the promise that was one of their key points ; implementing the 911 Commission reccomendations . This seems to be a direct result of Pelosi's two failed appointments , Murtha and Hastings .

Plans are not complete, but the incoming Democratic majority is likely to expand efforts to stop the proliferation of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons; ensure the interoperability of communications equipment so first responders can communicate more effectively; develop a comprehensive screening system for air cargo; and establish a civil-liberties board to protect the public against intelligence agencies expanding their reach. These are not new and have been worked on for quite some time by both Republicans and Democrats .
SO , nothing new so far from the ones who were going to "remake" the image of Congress .
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,054 • Replies: 5
No top replies

 
Brent cv
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Nov, 2006 11:11 pm
@Curmudgeon,
Isn't that funny Smile
tumbleweed cv
 
  1  
Reply Fri 1 Dec, 2006 01:16 am
@Brent cv,
Just another speculation.
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Fri 1 Dec, 2006 08:00 am
@Curmudgeon,
Right on, Democraps get to be lame ducks for a change. Get ready for two years of empty promises. This should give then a good shot at taking the white house, LOL. Heah being defeated this election could turn out to be a God send.
tumbleweed cv
 
  1  
Reply Fri 1 Dec, 2006 08:15 am
@Drnaline,
Wishful thinking.Very Happy
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Sat 9 Dec, 2006 12:48 pm
@Curmudgeon,
Townhall.com::Iraq is Dems’ tar-baby::By David Keene

An old Democratic friend of mine stopped by the Monocle last week and while there ran into a Democratic senator of long acquaintance. The Senator was, of course, quite pleased with the outcome of the election and is looking forward to the perks and responsibilities that go with being in the majority.

The two talked for a few minutes, but the Senator was more than a little taken aback when my friend asked him what he and his fellow Democrats intend to do with the war they managed to acquire with their new majority. "What do you mean?" he said. "Iraq is Bush's war and his problem." "Oh, no," my friend responded, "it was his war until Nov. 9, but your party ran condemning the war, Bush's management of it and promised to end it in one way or another. Now, you guys are going to have to come up with a plan because you are in the majority and with the majority comes responsibility … especially on problems voters believe you promised to solve."

It was a sobering thought and the senator was momentarily speechless, but then got very, very cautious and assured my friend that most Democrats believe it would be dangerous to do anything precipitous. Fortunately, there was no one from MoveOn.Org at the next table.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Democrats Reject Key 9/11 Panel Suggestion
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/03/2024 at 06:24:12