Reply
Sat 22 Nov, 2003 04:12 am
Do you base your vote on the military record of a candidate? Dan Quayle and Bill Clinton took a lot of heat for their so-called "draft dodging". George Bush has been criticized for his less than brilliant military career.
Now the Republicans are starting to snipe at Howard Dean because he took a medical exemption during the Viet Nam war.
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/22/politics/campaigns/22DRAF.html?hp
Critics say we need a candidate with "strong national security credentials". Come on now. How many Presidents have we had who put on his uniform and led troops into battle? We have a Department of Defense which is supposed to run wars. How does a tour of duty in any of the services make a man a better or wiser President? How does it teach him anything about government and all that entails?
Just thought I'd ask.
Well considering that the current President joined the National Guard to get out of Vietnam it should not be a problem. Bush Jr is surrounded by people who worked for his Dad so actually I feel he is just a puppet.
Welcome the asylum carlvjack.
Re: Dean's Draft Record
shoesharper wrote:Do you base your vote on the military record of a candidate?
Nope
Quote:Critics say we need a candidate with "strong national security credentials". Come on now. How many Presidents have we had who put on his uniform and led troops into battle? We have a Department of Defense which is supposed to run wars. How does a tour of duty in any of the services make a man a better or wiser President? How does it teach him anything about government and all that entails?
Depending on the job they actually have in the military it COULD teach them a lot. For most people though a single tour gives them just a touch of insight on how things work on the political end of the spectrum.
But for most of them, it is one of the few occassions where they'd be at the bottom end of the policy/power game. No one appreciates the problems inherent in government more than the people at the lowest end of the stick and for all the complaints about the military one thing it still does very well is act as the great equealizer. Whether you come from the harshest inner-city ghetto or some posh villa you still get treated just like the guy(gal) standing next to ya (like crap!

).
I doubt Dean's draft record will be really played out by the opposition.
However, it seems that Dean has captured 'something.' It's almost as if he's become a Rorschach test: ie, people see in him what they wish actually existed. Originally, I thought he was a fad and would have surely gone away by now. More's the pity. He reminds me of Clinton in his seeming lack of any 'there' there...like Clinton, he can put on a good show of having beliefs, but, then he turns around and provides the same show for a group with completely different beliefs from the first. However, Clinton was a master at this. Dean could be as well, but, I do believe that Bush will be re-elected.
Please don't mistake that last sentence for my wish...simply with reference to our judiciary, I do not want Bush to be re-elected!
I have lived in both worlds - Sailor in US Navy/antiwar protestor. I don't believe it is the military experience/lack of military experience, but the man that makes the difference. Had I been in Clinton's shoes back then I would have done nothing different as regards Vietnam service.
edgarblythe, nor would I; sorry I dragged Clinton in, but it wasn't for the purpose of criticizing his lack of military service!
I understand. I also did not vote for Clinton when he ran against Dole, but instead voted Nader.
Edgar
Edgar, me also, but not until late in the evening in California when I was sure The Dems had enough votes to beat the Repugs. I think most Greens voted later in the day after the trends were clear.
BBB
Here in Texas it is a given that the Republicans will almost always win these days. That frees me to vote my conscience.
Phoenix -- Interesting list. But does this mean that all of them actually went to war, in a combat situation?
Medical exemption is medical exemption. So long as no special influence were used to get it, it is a nonissue.
shoesharper- Don't know. You might want to go to the link, and check out the individual presidents.
see this is why we need wesley clark or at the very least, kerry.
clinton was the only president without military experience to be elected since FDR. the odds are against dean.
Yes, I did. Don't have the time now to check each individually, maybe later when I have more time. I do notice, however, that until you get to Lincoln the names are not among our greatest presidents. So I have to wonder again if military service makes a man (or woman) more qualified to be president.
Just generally speaking without evidence, I offer the opine that military experience is neither postive not negative as a political asset. There might very well be some military assignments that could imrove ones political/leadership skills but I would verture to say that, on the whole, it's not an advantage. The disadvantage I would likely expect is that a military career does not indicate "group" thinking/compromise necessary in the give and take of socio/political dialogue. Absolute authority to "win the war" is not a democratic process.