@Brent cv,
Brent;6199 wrote:Howard Dean was against the war from the start and ran on a platform against it. He didn't receive the nomination from the Democratic party.
Instead John Kerry won it. Someone who voted for the war in Iraq and had no real plan for its future.
Initially, Kerry had an anti-war image, then as the campaign heated up and
the other side attacked his anti-war past he got kinda "I'm a soldier." Also,
a lot of democrats who participate in the primaries and wield influence in the
party wanted someone who could please the people in the center, that's their
thinking, and it was wrong! They didn't know their own base, which happens a
lot with the DNC, unfortunately.
There's a lot of talk about re-examining the caucase system, because it
does funny things to the momentum of the primaries, and lobbying is
VERY influential in the first few.
Dean became head of the DNC, though. He had the power when all was
said and done.
If your point was the some powerful Dems wanted to win so bad they
ended up not really standing fro anything, I have to agree... and that's not
a proud moment for them.