@Drnaline,
Drnaline wrote:So if you made a wise decision and invested in let say Microsoft and became a millionsaire you would give it all up because you made to much? I think not.
I don't know but you believe in alot of other stuff that seems just as far fetched?
Sounds like an opinion. Got anything a little more substancial?
Then why say this, "and he invaded a sovereign nation for their oil," We invaded them so we could take it then? I don't understand your statement?
I can prove bill lied, where is your proof that bush lied. Not heresay, proof?
No he was not thrown out because Congress allowed him to finish his term. Ken Starr didn't spend near as much as the left trying to get Rove, Libby? And the money was spent to show the world that the President Lied about recieving oral sex, not about getting it.
Proven fact, where? I haven't seen any facts yet? But we do have a video of clinton. Broader scope of issues huh? Care to be a little more specific?
Your a little late to say that now.
First of all, do you expect me to answer each and every one of those quotes?:rolleyes: Most of your quotes would have to be addressed in seperate threads. To address each one would send this thread so far off- topic I doubt anyone would know what we were talking about.
Microsoft? What does Microsoft have to do with record oil company profits?
You mention my comment were far fetched. Until they are proven wrong by contrasting facts, they haven't been proven wrong. I'v been proven wrong before, so you have some wiggle room:D
There isn't enough bandwidth here to address all of Bushs lies. Do you actually believe everything he says? It's been a long time since I saw a thread titled " Why does everyone think Bush is a liar." Far be it for me to break the news .:rolleyes:
Getting, recieving. That to me means Clinton was the recipient of sexual favors. That falls under being politically correct.:wink:
I know how much Ken Starr has spent, but I'd have to research Rove and Libby. Perhaps you could show me some figures , since you mentioned them.
If you really want figures I'll post them for Starrs investigation.
I don't recall saying we stole oil. I said we invaded because of WMD. Because we didn't find any, I suggested that it was for the oil, which seems logical because it wasn't for the WMD. If it wasn't because of oil, and it wasn't because of WMD, what was it for? You know my theory, tell me yours.
I'm not going to post a bunch of info to prove my point if your just going to say "Oh thats far fetched." I have better things to do.:rolleyes:
This looks like a highjacked thread to me.Weren't we discussing the Bush SOTU address?