@hingehead,
Quote:It's not a space I have much contact with, but it does seem to me that the non-indigenous unemployed are either in temporary unemployment or are the rugged and the buggered. I can't see dropping unemployment much. Would like to know how many of the unemployed are mentally ill, socially dysfunctional, or coping with physical ailments and disabilities that make inflexible employment impossible for them.
I can't honestly see much drop in the unemployment rates, either, hinge.
I would add
discrimination (like age, when people who are perfectly capable of the work required, but are always unsuccessful in their applications for work despite that) to the list of reasons you've given for ongoing unemployment.
If the federal government wants to see real improvement in employment rates, then I think surely some proactive initiatives are required? Not just rhetoric. The reliance on the private sector to create work opportunities is more than a little unrealistic, I think.
Whatever happened to government initiated work programs?
I mean for
real, necessary programs that the private sector would never dream of becoming involved in.
(But I can already hear the cries of no more taxes! to pay for such things.
)
But when the prime minister says things like this, in the current circumstances:
''I will fight the prejudice that says some people's lot is drawing a fortnightly cheque, that we shouldn't expect anything more of them,'' she said. ''Relying on welfare to provide opportunity is no longer the right focus for our times."
I see her as adopting opportunistic, thoroughly unpleasant populist rhetoric ... designed to appeal to the worst prejudices in the community.
This sort of rhetoric doesn't surprise me at all if it comes from an Abbott or a Howard. But it is deeply disappointing & disturbing coming from the leader of the Australian Labor Party & the PM of this country.
Whoever is advising her is barking up entirely the wrong tree.
And even
she would well know better than this!