@hingehead,
Quote:Hockey stands by gay “waste” comments
Shadow Treasurer Joe Hockey has refused to clarify comments that spending public funds on elderly LGBTI people is a “waste of money”.
Last week, Hockey told the Sunday Telegraph that programs to train aged care staff in how to deal with increasing numbers of LGBTI seniors who may face discrimination should be paid for by private operators, not taxpayers.
A spokesman for Hockey told the Star Observer that the shadow treasurer stood by the comment and claimed the objection was not because the funding was for the LGBTI community, but because of the program itself.
“Mr Hockey was asked to respond to a specific question regarding the use of taxpayer funds,” the spokesman said.
“He was not singling out any particular group in the community nor was he denigrating any particular group.”
But when asked if Hockey also thought funding for other groups such as Aboriginal seniors or a new program for seniors from non-English speaking backgrounds was wasteful spending, the spokesman refused to clarify....
I had no idea of what
LGBTI meant. So I Googled to Find out:
Quote:LGBTI:
The National LGBTI Health Alliance uses “LGBTI” as a recognisable acronym to collectively refer to a group of identities that includes lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans/transgender and intersex people and other sexuality, sex and gender diverse people, regardless of their term of self-identification. ...
http://www.lgbthealth.org.au/LGBTI
I don't see what Joe Hockey is getting at.
Why advocate for discriminatory policies for
any elderly Australians?
Why should Joe Hockey consider
this particular group a "waste of money" compared to other elderly Australians?
Why should "private operators" be considered a more appropriate avenue of support for elderly gays & other LGBTI people in Australia? They are part of our community just like all other elderly people, surely?
As our possible next treasurer (heaven help us!) Hockey needs to fully explain his comments, surely?