@Robert Gentel,
DD is exactly correct above, and I will say that I find your repeated insistence that I believe that all these people to be 'genetically inferior' to be a weak retreat from the substance of the argument on your part, Robert. You have latched on to one statement I made and tried to use it to attack my entire position. This isn't logically valid. I've explained to you what I meant, and if you don't want to accept that as valid, that's your problem, not mine; for your insistence that this one sentence of mine somehow encapsulates the problem is erroneous in the extreme.
I think the truth here is that you have a real stick up your ass about the homeless and people who don't get all weepy inside about the problem, and you enjoy arguing about it. You don't want to hear other people's opinions, or accept them as valid, you just want someone to argue with. I'm not interested in arguing with you for the sake of argument.
On that note, I'd really like you to define what your argument is here, Robert, because - your attempt at deflecting my question aside - you are all over the place in this thread. I have
consistently and from the very beginning said that I base my beliefs and feelings about this issue on the actions of those involved,
not their inherent characteristics. You keep trying to change the conversation away from this, because holding homeless folks responsible for their behavior - in essence, treating them exactly as you would anyone else - doesn't fit the narrative you are putting forth.
Cycloptichorn