1
   

Pilot to Blame for Paul Wellstone Plane Crash

 
 
Reply Tue 18 Nov, 2003 05:15 pm
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 6,727 • Replies: 4
No top replies

 
fishin
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Nov, 2003 07:24 pm
So much for all those conspiracy theories that were floating around..
0 Replies
 
Suzette
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Nov, 2003 11:25 am
Well, it certainly sounds believeable to me!

Never mind that the original news reports on the date of the crash didn't match the subsequent news items; but, hey, the deaths have been filed under "pilot error", so WTF? It doesn't really matter anyway...right?
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Nov, 2003 11:39 am
As a person with literally hundreds of hours of flight time in the co-pilots seat of a similar aircraft (I am not a pilot, my father was), I predicted this conclusion the day the crash occurred. High and fast is always better than low and slow.

I found it interesting that they even bothered to comment on the pilots training to recover from a stall. At the altitude they were at there was no room for recovery.
0 Replies
 
Suzette
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Nov, 2003 12:03 pm
Why? http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20020527&c=3&s=nichols

What? http://www.assassinationscience.com/PaulWellstone.pdf
And
http://www.assassinationscience.com/LogicAndEvidence.pdf
(Both of those fine articles require Adobe Acrobat Reader)

Feelings...

October 25, 2002: Senator Paul Wellstone dies in a plane crash. The victims also included Wellstone's wife, Sheila, and daughter, Marcia; three campaign staff members; and two pilots.
Accident or assassination?
My own feeling is assassination: Wellstone threatened the Power, and it killed him. The plane "went down in bad weather", and both pilots didn't get on the radio to say "We're in trouble!" ... ? I don't think so.
That's just my opinion. Do your own reasearching and thinking, decide for yourself. Consider ...
1) No radio call reporting trouble from either pilot
2) Planes do fail, but they are not so fragile and vulnerable
3) Eyewitness reports: the plane was on fire on the way down
4) Weather not that bad
5) Such is the nature of the Power -- to kill that which opposes it
6) Convenient timing -- just before a critical election
7) Eyewitness reports: gunshots
7) Exaggerated reports of freezing rain and icing
8) Chief Pilot Richard Conry had felony record -- he lied about his experience as a pilot
9) NTSB spokesman is a former CIA operative
10) Bush regime despised Wellstone like nobody else. Wellstone was his own man, a genuine leftist, a Senator who spoke out against the Power.
http://www.karljones.com/who/w/wellstone/wellstone_death.asp


There was more at the time; the differences between what was reported and how it changed; but, hey you're right, no one in the US is in danger just because they have integrity and they speak out, even if the person is a popular U.S. senator with have a loyal constituency; so, of course it was all just a random accident. Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Pilot to Blame for Paul Wellstone Plane Crash
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/29/2024 at 07:37:21