LOL, a typical Timberland take!
Les' pick up on one or two things ...
timberlandko wrote:Today's RealClearPolitics average, based on a sample period encompassing 6/21 through 7/7, shows a slight (0.8%) lead for The Incumbent, head-to-head. Both indicators remain well within their established mean deviation over the past 6 weeks or so, leading to the conclusion The Edwards Bump is transient if not illusory.
I'll give you Rasmussen, but you're joking about the RCP one right? I mean, really. The Edwards choice is 1 day old. How do you take the average of polls from over the two weeks
before that choice as evidence that the choice did not create a bump? That just doesnt make any sense!
Quote:It is my perception, as stated before, that The Opposition gas been campaigning vigorously and non-stop since the beginning of the 2000 Primary Races, while The Incumbent has been otherwise occupied. That The Opposition, despite great effort and expense, and the absence of any concerted counter-effort,
Does the "absence of any concerted counter-effort" happen to include an 80-million attack ad campaign against the Dem contender?
Thats more ad money than was spent in an entire election campaign not too long ago ...
Quote:The present situation, to my mind, is wonderfully, almost eerily, reminiscent of the earlier appearance of Governor Dean's invincibility,
Dean may have seemed "invincible" in the
primary race, but surely you're not suggesting the media or even yer average mainstream Democrat back then believed Dean was invincible vis-a-vis
Bush? Just this board here should yield enough expressions of apprehension about that ...
For that matter, I haven't seen much of a sense of "invincibility" among Democrats now, either ... well, PDiddie aside <grins>