The least cruel method of execution?

I had the best sex of my life period with a French Canadian girl named Suzanne Christink back in the seventies.

Drop dead beautiful, petite, but with breasts the size of refrigerators, horny, deviant, God I enjoyed my time with her.

I used to tour Canada with a pre Cirkus band called Jubal back then. Suzanne was from Winnipeg.

I have fond memories of Canada.

0 Replies

If there had been a referendum on the death penalty when I was 18, I would have been voting for it. Now I would vote against it. It doesn't benefit society at all.

0 Replies

Same here Wilso. I just assume they rot in jail.

0 Replies

As long as there is any possibility that even one person might be innocent, execution of any type is abhorent.

I wondered about the Mormon tradition and found this on google:

Quote:

The clarification from the church was needed, according to one commission member, because of a historical Mormon doctrine that held that justice was not done unless a murderer's blood was shed.

Utah is the only state that uses the firing squad method, although Idaho and Oklahoma retain it as an option if other methods are not viable.

(Copyright 2003 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)

0 Replies

I agree Diane. Far too many people have been put to death who were later found innocent. One is too many.

0 Replies

Way Off topic but
maybe some would find it interesting. I toured Canada. For the "The Wild Saga of the Bourbon Cowboys click on this:

http://www.indiejournal.com/indiejournal/columns/philfrazier.htm

0 Replies

Bi-Polar Bear wrote:

Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
Shot in the head during a giant orgasm would be good.....I'm sure you could contract Brittney Spears for it the way her career's going........you could be coming and going at the same time....

Scrat, I wrote this before noticing your suggestioin about the whack on the back of the head....didn't mean to plagarize........for once we agree about something.....

To my great pleasure, I might add! Cool

0 Replies

I don't like hearing that prisons are better equipped, technically, than many of our public schools or prisoners are better taken care of than our soldiers in the military. That should never, ever be. But it is.
I can't feel compassion for some pig facing the death penalty for raping and murdering a child and don't give a damn how they decide to take him out for that crime.

0 Replies

the least cruel method of execution? that's like asking what the most compassionate method of rape is.

0 Replies

I think it would be interesting for people who have ideas about what life is like in prisons to go visit one. In my years working for the Colorado State Dept of Human Services I spend one year working inside our prison system. Its a genuine horror show.

0 Replies

Took care of a lot of prisoners in King County Jail while working in the ED at Harborview and at the Baltimore Corrections Facility while at Hopkins. They definitely don't have it easy!

0 Replies

Prisons
Anyone that has been in one as an employee or inmate knows it aint no picnic. Maybe that's why it's called Hard Time?

0 Replies

And they're NOT all in there for violent crimes.

0 Replies

A vast number.
I don't know the percentage but a great perecentage are in prison due to the idiotic drug laws of the US. Another topic I know but what the Hell, eh?

Maybe I will start a topic about the Stupid Drug Laws of the US. Remember the War On Drugs? Another huge waste of money.

0 Replies

People who lock people up for drugs should be locked up!

0 Replies

I think a majority of A2K'ers think the drug war is idiotic and about as counterproductive as any undertaking I've ever viewed.

0 Replies

War on Poverty.

War on Drugs.

War on Terrorism.

Are we winning any of those?

Is it possible we even can?

0 Replies

There is no least cruel method of execution.

0 Replies

PDiddie wrote:

War on Poverty.

War on Drugs.

War on Terrorism.

Are we winning any of those?

Is it possible we even can?

I suppose it depends on how you define "winning". I think of the effort to war with these things as having a goal of reducing the amount of these things, and as such, I think it is possible to "win" or to be "winning", but that doesn't mean our current methods are "winning" these wars. I am convinced that the liberal thinking which gave birth to most of what we currently call the war on poverty actually creates more poverty, not less. Likewise I think that the conservative thinking behind our war on drugs actually does more harm to society than does the use of drugs.

As to the war on terrorism, the only thing I am sure of is that we either take the war to them--as the current administration and its allies are trying to do--or they will bring the war to us. We do not have the luxury of simply choosing not to fight this war.

0 Replies

scrat, a serious question for I know not the answer, Has world-wide terrorism increased or decreased since the US invaded Iraq?

0 Replies

The least cruel method of execution?

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know