@Smiley451,
IMO, there is a difference in consciousness and awareness. For instance, ever been driving down the road, a familiar road, and get lost in reverie (daydreaming about this or that) and all of a sudden you "snap out of it" and notice you have no recollection of the past 10 miles you traveled. It is as if you were on "auto pilot" and your sub-conscious was in charge. Though we didn't remember it doesn't mean it didn't happen; it's just perhaps inexplicable. Such is the subject we are discussing. Just because we don't remember 'that consciousness' that existed before we took our first breath, doesn't mean it didn't exist. We just don't remember it. Being that event is not "familiar" simply because we have nothing to compare it to like the familiarity of that oft traveled road, we conclude there is no awareness therefore it "doesn't exist".
This is, at it's core, the erroneous rationalization that justified the horrific act of abortion. This rationalization allows us to "sleep" at night, though we will "toss and turn" as our awareness and consciousness will always be at unrest as long as this continues.
Just because we are not familiar with it, how can we possibly know the consciousness and awareness of another as we cannot adequately define it in ourselves as the above scenario illustrates. How do we have the "right" to assume that we are not familiar with? To ease our mind? Offer reason that gives us temporary solace? Ignore the realization of actions? We are all guilty of this affliction to some degree of another. It is, IMO, as survival mechanism that will only lead to further irrationalizations until all becomes irrational which will lead to insanity; another matter we are not familiar with (well some of us anyway thanks to the drugs of science, the last item on my "list".)
Therefore it reasonable to conclude conscious and awarness do exist and are not meant to be disturbed, not "remembering" is no excuse.
William