1
   

Iraqetnam

 
 
Reply Tue 11 Nov, 2003 11:40 pm
"Trying to eliminate Saddam... would have incurred incalculable human and political costs. Apprehending him was probably impossible... we would have been forced to occupy Baghdad and, in effect, rule Iraq... there was no viable 'exit strategy' we could see, violating another of our principles... Going in and occupying Iraq, thus unilaterally exceeding the United Nations' mandate, would have destroyed the precedent of international response to aggression that we hoped to establish. Had we gone the invasion route, the United States could conceivably still be an occupying power in a bitterly hostile land." - George Bush Sr. (excerpted from his memoirs long after the first Gulf War)

http://www.guerrillanews.com/war_on_terrorism/doc3317.html
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 524 • Replies: 2
No top replies

 
Wilso
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Nov, 2003 01:26 am
The US still doesn't have an exit strategy.
0 Replies
 
pistoff
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Nov, 2003 04:35 am
No exit.
There never was one. The idea was that the Iraqies would welcome occupation and everything would be rosey.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Iraqetnam
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/26/2024 at 07:59:56