@GoshisDead,
GoshisDead;67910 wrote:Caroline:
I agree that its an inflammatory message.
1) Fighting with trolls is what they want, and the fight is what brings them in droves to a forum. We have very conscientious mods who seem to be good at weeding out trolls.
I agree, some of us (not to name names), are more than willing to investigate whether a user is a troll or not.
GoshisDead wrote:
2) Maybe its just my passion for free speech and art in all its forms, even the atrocious ones that makes me feel that expression in this section of the forum should not be subject to topical criticism.
I agree that this section should not be subject to criticism of subject matter within reason. Obviously, blatant disregard to the forum rules will be subject to deletion (e.g. no discrimination based on race, sex, sexual orientation).
GoshisDead wrote:
3)How in the world is any position on the abortion issue not extreme? There is no moderation in an issue like this one is either for or against, it is a naturally polemic topic. Saying Bo is an extremist for anti-abortion views is a pot and kettle conversation.
I agree. He has a valid position, although I could not disagree with his reasoning more. Even if I was pro-life, I would not agree with his rationalizations.
GoshisDead wrote:
4) Why should it be moved? There is no such thing as pro-abortion fiction? Oh mercy me I have never ever read a story with an agenda before.
It should stay here because it is a piece of fiction, even if, a poor piece of fiction that is obviously a rough sketch for a potentially good piece of pro-life fiction. I know I could write a story with the same premise and it could be half way decent look into the life of the woman who once performed a coat-hanger abortion in the 1950s.
GoshisDead wrote:
5) You are most likely right that he isn't too interested in actual writing critique, but then again he may be. However I will continue giving writing critique to those who ask for it out of my respect for the craft and those who are trying to do something with it. There is a real story in there if he works at it, a story that has the potential to touch the most pro of the pro-abortion people. An old lady feeling regret over a choice in her youth is universally touching. An old lady hallucination about the could have been is universally intriguing. Change the topic from the kid she aborted to the kid she accidentally "killed" by smoking crack while pregnant and "awe how sad, what a touching story and what a testimony for not smoking crack while pregnant". Just because you don't agree with the political message doesn't mean it wouldn't be a touching story about the inner demons this old lady is facing.
I am with Gosh on this one. Although I was rather harsh with some off my critique, I was being honest. I think I am going to write up some rules for the Creative Writing and kind of take over the forum as its watch dog. I I will probably go through the subforum, and clear out the trash that does not belong. I think we can help each other become better creative writers in this area by allowing for a way to offer improvements and suggestions. This will require people that respond to pieces of creative writing constructively, rather than critically against its subject matter. That is for the other forums, but this one should be specifically for sharing creative writing, and also receiving constructive criticism that can be used to improve the work.