@Bracewell,
Bracewell wrote:Alan, it is even worse than what you rightly say because it seems it is a priciple that the universe must look the same to every observer - yep, no matter where they are and even on a planet in a galaxy at the limit of what we observe.
And Caroline,
I have often thought about the observer of reality.In the quantum world of the infinitesimal such as an electron, it only exists if it is observed (you can check the truth of that if you like)
I think often about the reality of the universe, indeed the totality of all existence, if I cease to exist, then so does the whole universe, of course that is from my perspective and last moment of perception This is more of a philosophical idea than scientific of course .
So Caroline and Barcewell, from your point of view, if you guys cease to exist, as far as you are concerned so has the entire universe, making you infinitely important in the grand order of things?
Your mind and thoughts and observations are all that give it meaning, changing this phantom into concrete reality, but only concrete reality from your observer platform, who knows what another perceives
Is your RED my RED? maybe you see BLUE where I see GREEN and we both are wrong and both call it RED and of course if we are consistent we will never know, unless we can get into each others brains and observe out of each others eyes
A
RED traffic light might always observed in this actual color through their eyes
Observer one: sees the traffic light in front of him thus
RED WAIT
Observer two sees: the traffic light in front of him
RED wait
But each refer to what they observe as RED, and in reality does it matter, it is all about personal perception so long as it is consistent between the two observers it does not matter, or does it?
Example
RED? RED? They both use the term RED but in reality they are seeing different colors and just referring to them by the same name/color
Or is
RED ALWAYS
RED?
They are blissfully unaware that their perceptions are completely different and wrong
So who of the two are wrong?
If we take the universe as an another example, if there were no observer of it, great or small would it exist?. Many great physicists think the universe is just a phantasm our specter of our minds and so do I at times
Maybe the universe is just a phantasm or specter in the mind of all living things in it
Could a universe barren of sentient life be considered to exist, if so by whom and by what?, maybe a god looking at it from the outside. But why would such a god need to look at a lifeless thing or create it in the first place?
If that god got bored and cease to look at such a universe, would it vanish from existence?