Stephen Hawking says it will and you say it wont, maybe you are right and he is wrong
It is true that it might have not increased its mass , but it has hugely almost infinitely increased its density
I dont really see a paradox on it, the fact that they were born twins doesnt means they are logically bound to be alike forever
Forward travel in time is possible, but time travel into the past impossible, it is, however, possible to go into the future. The twin paradox is when a spaceman travels at almost the speed of light to a distant star, he will age much slower than his twin brother on earth
The reason for this time moves slower on a massive object than a less massive object. As the spacecraft approached the speed of light it becomes more and more massive, exponentially at that.
Einstein said it is impossible to get up to the speed of light because the object would need all the energy in the universe to do it and time will stand still,It would rip the universe apart
Back to the twins the twin on the earth will age at the normal rate of an earthy being, the twin speeding deep into the cosmos will age much slower, when the spaceman returns, he might find his twin a very old person, or if he had gone far out into the universe at a huge speed he might come back to the earth when humans are long gone on a bleak dead dying ancient unrecognisable planet.
The paradox is only about how the two twins age, the one on the journey at near light speed almost stops aging, while his twin on earth continues to age at the normal rate
Time travel is fiction based, not scientific, nor theoretical, nor philosophical.
Take me for example are you really going to believe me over two of the acclaimed smartest people on Earth? I also think Stephen Hawkins fell off his rocker years ago. All this nonsense about Black Holes, Neutron Stars, and Time Travel me oh my how the things in this universe have to be so complex!
The Universe is simple... Very Simple... but so many people try to make it things it will never be.
I don't agree with that perception of time. You are not going into the future by approaching light you are merely slowing down the decay process of your body. If we put 1 apple in the freezer and 1 apple in the sun and 4 days later we notice the apple in the sun has rotted but the apple in the freezer looks just dandy. Do we then say that the apple went into the future? Surely not.
Science and logic prove it impossible, so they are yes interested and involved in time travel, as in continually proving it impossible
Black holes and neutron stars werent just invented, their teories were created because there are things in space that wouldnt make sense in the previous universal conceptions.
If we dont try to discover more about the universe our knowledge on this field will not advance. It also doesnt matters if theories are wrong, because as long as they work they are acceptable and they can always be replaced later.
Time travel is fiction based, not scientific, nor theoretical, nor philosophical. Time travel is fictional, and the members who persist in making 'theories' do it only because they are selected members of society who can benefit from the fantasies and dreams of the others.
Basically it's along these lines Einstein and what's his face Hawkins(who does this quite alot) are given so much esteem by the media that the common people forget that these stars of physics and science 'etc' are humans themselves and have their own motives.
Take me for example are you really going to believe me over two of the acclaimed smartest people on Earth? I also think Stephen Hawkins fell off his rocker years ago. All this nonsense about Black Holes, Neutron Stars, and Time Travel me oh my how the things in this universe have to be so complex!
The Universe is simple... Very Simple... but so many people try to make it things it will never be.
You are not going into the future by approaching light you are merely slowing down the decay process of your body. If we put 1 apple in the freezer and 1 apple in the sun and 4 days later we notice the apple in the sun has rotted but the apple in the freezer looks just dandy. Do we then say that the apple went into the future? Surely not.
Time travel can happen, I the people on the space vehicle approaching the speed of light, "from their perceptive will be living at a normal rate and so will their clocks on their space ship"
If they could observe what was happening at on earth, time will flash by at an enormous rate forests will come into existence and vanish, ice ages will come and go in minutes
Of course only at near C 99.99999999
If an earth observer could look into the speeding space ship from "their perceptive", the clock in the space ship and space men might appear to not to move, those on might have to continuing observing the space vehicle for hundreds or even thousand of years to see the clock second hand move one click forward in time. Indeed from the earth observers point of view everything on the spaceship will appear frozen in time
This effect has been proved by putting to synchronized extremely accurate atomic clocks on a high speed vehicle like a space rocket or airplane
The atomic clock on the airplane was found to go slower than than the clock that remain stationary on the surface
This is not theory it is hard empirically tested science,so we know, we don't speculate that the twin paradox will happen on space vehicles that go at enormous speeds to explore the universe, "we know it will"
Time travel to the past , but you can go into the future , but it is a one way trip you can never return near to the time you left
You even age slower at the top of a skyscraper than you would if you lived on the ground flour , the difference in time is infinitesimal of course
The universe is decidedly NOT SIMPLE it is unimaginably complex that is why only a few great mind have little comprehension about all its wonder. Look at your brain is that simple, and yes it is part and parcel of the universe
How can you know things will never be, powered heavier than air flight was considered nonsense by some scientist before the Wright brothers proved them wrong An example comment by an eminent scientist of the day If you could ever get such a contraption into the air , "how would you come back to earth safely?, "soon as you slowed down this ridiculous craft would fall to the ground like a dead bird". Thank god the Wright brothers did not listen to statements like than
Of course unlike you I don't understand all about the universe, in fact I am envious of your omniscience
You insulting statements about great physicists like Stephen Hawking and Albert Einstein leads me to believe you are lacking in scientific knowledge and scientific history
It is obvious to me all you really know about astrophysics is limited to what you have read in the media
Stephen Hawking and Albert Einstein were Humans, just as fallible as me and you, sharing the same weaknesses as me and you. I do not partake in what the media says these days for it is mostly a jumble of nonsense made to look like sense, or degrading or upgrading celebrities (which i hate).
What if you took a moment and considered reality? :listening:
An atom is simple an atom here and now and the space in between atoms is called a void. That there is no other 'dimension' and that the Universe is infinity, I really don't see how one could travel through time other than the regular way. It's really as simple as this. If time travel were possible it would destroy the fundamentals of our society, someone would have gone back in time long ago to try and disprove all religions, or a super futuristic Army would take over Earth because of an advancing Alien race in the future was winning a war.
So, you see people can not time travel not into the future and not to the past, with the exception of freezing yourself in a cryogenics lab of sorts.
"Stephen Hawking once suggested that the absence of tourists from the future constitutes an argument against the existence of time travel-a variant of the Fermi paradox. Of course this would not prove that time travel is physically impossible, since it might be that time travel is physically possible but that it is never in fact developed (or is cautiously never used); and even if it is developed, Hawking notes elsewhere that time travel might only be possible in a region of spacetime that is warped in the right way, and that if we cannot create such a region until the future, then time travelers would not be able to travel back before that date, so "This picture would explain why we haven't been over run by tourists from the future."[10] Carl Sagan also once suggested the possibility that time travelers could be here, but are disguising their existence or are not recognized as time travelers."
Let me suggest to you the relativity of common sense, there is no time travel, there is no other dimensions, and there is no physical proof that these things exist outside hypothesis and 'theories' created by supply and demand from the populace.
Science and Logic have nothing to do with time travel, it's commen sense.:poke-eye:
Let me suggest to you the relativity of common sense, there is no time travel, there is no other dimensions, and there is no physical proof that these things exist outside hypothesis and 'theories' created by supply and demand from the populace.
The universe is not infinite if it were it could not expand the arrow of time would be pushed back to eternity and we could never have reached the present moment in time, you would not exist, the earth would not have come into existence.
The universe had a beginning the Big Bang and it will end someday , be it by the great crunch, heat entropic death or the cold dark freezing death of an ever expanding universe decaying into utter nothingness but an infinite void.
The idea behind this line of thinking is that not only is the process of decay slowing down, but all processes are slowing, even those processes that define the standard time interval slow down. If one second is defined as the duration of 9 192 631 770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the cesium 133 atom and this process inside the spacecraft slows down relative to the identical process on the earth, then in the spacecraft, while it is in realtive motion with respect to the earth, time must be passing at a slower rate than time on the earth (after all they are identical processes).
If a scientist cools down something to near 0 Kelvin would you really refer to what ever was being cooled as something passing through time slower then you are? I view time as some sort of non physical clock that is unaffected my physical things.
No, the mechanism in an atomic clock is not affected by temperature. An atomic clock at near absolute zero is an easier to use atomic clock than one at room temperature NIST-F1 - Cesium Fountain Atomic Clock
I was referring to the difference in process rate due to the constancy of the speed of light in all frames of reference.
Alright, try proving time travel is impossible winhout science or logic
The inexistence of proof is not enough to dismiss something. If someone throws a grenade at me I will have no proof it is true until it explodes, but I will jump away before-hand anyway.
The universe is infinite. That is, indeed, impossible, but that is why the beggining of the universe is a paradox: It cant be finite because to any event to happen it requires time, so for time to start it would need a meta-time, wich would need a meta-meta-time, and so on.
Previously posted by validity
No, the mechanism in the atom part of the atomic clock is not affected by temperature. An atomic clock at near absolute zero is an easier to use atomic clock than one at room temperature NIST-F1 - Cesium Fountain Atomic Clock
I was referring to the difference in process rate due to the constancy of the speed of light in all frames of reference.
In other words Infinite regression , with time regressing infinitely into the past it can never flow to the future. That type of universe is impossible and that and we appear to agree on that just using different semantics
Indeed, but a finite universe is impossible as well, as nothing comes out of nothing (if it did we would have to ask where "nothing" came from). So the beggining of the universe is a paradox... dang
What ever it may be is it not a physical effect on the atom that is slowing the process rate down?
You cant go forward if there is no forward to go forward to.