Brandon9000
 
  0  
Reply Wed 3 Nov, 2021 12:07 pm
Actually, science does NOT tell us theoretically that one can travel back in time. How were you thinking someone could do that?
0 Replies
 
Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Wed 3 Nov, 2021 12:44 pm
@Jasper10,
Modern day science with it’s HALF logic output possibility theories is not even close to a united theory…….The reason being is that their unbalanced gravity theory is a load of nonsense, hence they have been unable able to connect it to the physical body/brain workings and ACTUAL psychological experiences.
htam9876
 
  1  
Reply Sun 7 Nov, 2021 07:04 pm
Idealism vs materialism, touchy and feely 2

Below was woody’s comment in PHF:

New Broom

There have been a number of occasions in physics history where the descriptions were getting increasingly complicated.
(the epicycles in the orbits of the planets is probably my favourite example).
Then a new idea comes along, sweeps away the complication and opens paths for new discoveries.
(Newton's ideas on Gravity would never have been developed from the epicycle model).
Often the new idea requires the rejection of assumptions that were previously held sacrosanct
(the epicycle assumption held that the heavens are perfect, and circles are perfect, so there can be only circles in the heavens).

https://physicshelpforum.com/threads/majorana-neutrino.15084/post-43603

Piggy’s additional comment here:
According to the astronomical observation, the “orbits of the planets” actually are a bit “oval”. The significant thing in science was that Newton's ideas on Gravity and the classical Mechanics could explain / DESCRIBE it effectively. (The function of plane geometry was significant in this respect). Such physicals conceptions as length, time, energy, mass, force, momentum, angular momentum, work, power, etc, worked well with the assistance of some mathematical tools in scientific practice. Then, the primary physics / science system (frame) formally established.

While
+ / -, + / -, could do nothing;
Toggle toggle, could do nothing either;
NEUTRAL NEUTRAL, could do nothing either;
AUTOPILOT MANUAL, could do nothing either;
0101, could do nothing either;
Okay, the J – 10 # hole PRESENCE! It could do nothing either;
BUBBLE BUBBLE…

Useful is useful;
Useless is useless.

呵呵
Have a lovely day.
0 Replies
 
Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Mon 8 Nov, 2021 01:29 am
@Jasper10,
+/- and -/+ logic output possibility combinations on their own can do nothing……the 2 off fools are correct…..lol

It’s only when -/- and +/+ logic possibilities are superimposed over +/- and -/+ logic and utilised in calculations reasonings as well that everything makes perfect sense.

Superimposing in this way is PERFECTLY consistent with real science/philosophy.

FULL logic combination possibilities should be used in science and philosophy calculations/reasonings, not just HALF, as is presently the case.
Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Mon 8 Nov, 2021 08:37 am
@Jasper10,
Maaaaan jeeeeese Luise...your neurons about input output minus and plus are full of synapses...cut the addiction while you can!
Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Mon 8 Nov, 2021 11:47 am
@Albuquerque,
Ha..Ha…Albuquerque…..how are you?

Cut the addiction?…I have no addiction……my logic makes perfect sense and ties in nicely with real science and philosophy.

The reason most people get their science and philosophy wrong is because they only ASSUME that good is bad and bad is good…..or + is - and - is + or 0 is 1 and 1 is 0…

They then reach a nihilist stand off (cancelling) and conclude that man needs to make his own rules up or society would fall apart….forgetting that rules might already exist as a possibility …..I know exactly how it all works my friend….do you?

Modern day science and philosophy will get there in the end I’m sure….it just need to stop the BS.
Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Mon 8 Nov, 2021 01:10 pm
@Jasper10,
With real science and philosophy one can’t assume something as fact when it is ONLY a possibility…..simple……..ALL real science and philosophy is set up on this principle …..I adopt this principle all the time with amazing results…..you ought to try it sometime….….lol…
htam9876
 
  1  
Reply Mon 8 Nov, 2021 06:24 pm
Oh, piggy omitted something, sorry…
2 – “f”, could do nothing either;
4 – “f”, could do nothing either;
Even 10 – “f”, could do nothing either;
Useless is useless.

The reason of the ESTABLISHMENT of the primary physics / science system (frame) in this world is that some physics principles can explain / DESCRIBE some natural phenomena effectively and those physical conceptions are workable in practice. Such an ESTABLISHMENT has nothing to do with whose useless what logic at all.

Actually that NO SAVE fool can’t understand what’s scientific research and scientific analysis, even not capable to read and think normally. How can his view / logic must represent science? What a joke. Science really does have no idea how to persuade that NO SAVE fool that he is in his pipe DREAM. Never can WAKE UP.

呵呵
Have a lovely day.
0 Replies
 
Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Tue 9 Nov, 2021 12:43 am
@Jasper10,
As + and - charges are different and separate and this has been proven then inorder to make things balance they both definitely need to be on the right side of the fence and the left side of the fence as well in both scientific and philosophical equations.

The 4 off logic output possibility combinations give 2 off attraction forces and 2 off repelling forces between both sides of the fence thus obtaining PERFECT balance in scientific and philosophical terms….i.e. the spring finds perfect equilibrium.

Ha Ha …..I’m not sure why certain individuals have an issue with this.

Why would modern day science and philosophy refute that PERFECT electromechanical systems are at play both within the cosmos and the physical body including the brain and it’s workings when all the evidence suggests that this is indeed the case?

Metaphorically speaking, the fence therefore has a sinusoidal wave superimposed over it……which one again reinforces the theory that electromechanical systems are at play throughout the cosmos and our physical bodies.






htam9876
 
  1  
Reply Wed 10 Nov, 2021 05:17 pm
That NO SAVE fool is playing such a tricky logic game:
ABSTRACT his grand grand father as “1”;
ABSTRACT his grand grand mother as “0”;
Then, his so called fool logic mechanism established.
Thereafter, he exploits it in counter way:
“1” output his grand grand father;
“0” output his grand grandmother;
Then, he became the ancestor…
And, he became the “dog” in CONTROL, while his grand grand father and his grand grand mother have to become the “tail”.
Logic inverted. ABSTRACT overrides substance. Redundant game.
Useless is useless.
Actually that NO SAVE fool even can’t understand logic in a scientific / natural way, what can he do in science or philosophy?
(Actually such difference of output between * and # is based on spiral gene. Professional biologists can explain it explicitly. It’s real science.)

呵呵
Have a lovely day.
(Note: Piggy is not trying to “instruct” that NO SAVE fool, but to reiterate my stance: Oh Lord, SCIENCE SHOULD NOT BE MISGUIDED BY THAT FOOL’S PSYCHOLOGY INTO HIS CAGE OF LOGIC.)
0 Replies
 
Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Nov, 2021 01:26 am
@Jasper10,
I think the 2 off fools need to agree on something:

1. A united theory needs to take into account the human psychological experience as well and not just assume that consciousness balances out both sides of the fence as a result of just +/-….-/+ only logic interactions …..and therefore we are nothing more than +/- consciousness that ultimately annihilates itself (matter/antimatter)…..bearing in mind that scientists have no idea what consciousness is.

2.Electromechanical systems provide balance.

3.The cosmos is full of electromagnetic fields and the human physical body is an electromechanical system.

4.A system with + and - charges (forces) would appear to balance out with +/- …. -/+ only charge interactions (see item 1.) but it would appear that they also balance out with +/-….-/+…..-/-….+/+ charge interactions as well.

5.Big Bangs (-/-…+/+) and Big Crunches (-/+…+/-) could be the result of the differing charge interactions.

6.Big Bangs and Big Crunches happen within something.That something is completely separate and not influenced by them.

7.+ and - charges are different and would need to be on both sides of the fence if balance is to be maintained.This has been proved by observation.

8.Modern day standard science/philosophy theories are struggling to balance the books with only +/-…-/+ logic combination theories and are using GLUE to hold things together.

9.Science/Philosophy theories that utilise all +/-….-/+…-/-…+/+ logic combinations provide a better insight into how we/things work.

10.Modern day science and philosophy doesn’t have all the answers and is especially struggling to find answers to the hard problem of consciousness and whether a God actually exists or not.
Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Nov, 2021 03:45 am
@Jasper10,
My theory is that SELF is completely separate from the electromechanical system…AS A POSSIBILITY!!!!!
htam9876
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Nov, 2021 08:27 am
Big pile of rubbish. Idealism. Useless is useless.
What medicine to treat headache?
And what medicine to extinct virus?
The only solution to the issue of the title and the OP is to find out the physical essence of time in nature. It belongs to the category of meta physics.
Actually that NO SAVE fool knows nothing about scientific research at all.
0 Replies
 
Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Nov, 2021 02:59 pm
@Jasper10,
Perfection is Perfection….Imperfection is Imperfection.

Not sure what is useless about that???

The one fool is sitting there with his perfect magnetism theory ….well perfect on paper least…….Ha Ha….whilst the other fool has his glue I suppose…
htam9876
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Nov, 2021 05:35 pm
Perhaps virus has two mouths, one on the right cheek while another one on the left cheek.
“+/-, +/-” crunch all people dead. The most happy guys are of course the First Oder.
Bliss, glory and eternity will belong to virus and the First Order. Shining like sun ray…

呵呵
Have a lovely day.
0 Replies
 
Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Nov, 2021 01:55 am
@Jasper10,
Ha Ha …the other NO SAVE fool always forgets about +/+…-/- …expansion….all things not dead ….or good is good and bad is bad as possibilities.
htam9876
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Nov, 2021 01:59 pm
Perhaps it’s not about what science what theory, it’s about fact.
Those who can travel back in time to ask Einstein what this mathematical symbol “- t” means in physics well come back to talk...
Oh, Lord, this is not piggy’s thread…sorry for disturbance…haha
 https://physicshelpforum.com/data/attachments/3/3090-dc6ccb16b85c5ed70933dac6dbd4417e.jpg
0 Replies
 
Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Nov, 2021 12:15 am
@Jasper10,
Well it is a FACT that the cosmos is full of electromagnetic fields and it is a FACT that things spin in electromagnetic fields (stars/planets/ sub atomic particles) and it is a FACT that our physical bodies are electromechanical systems and it is a FACT that you get +/- toggling charge waveforms with electromechanical systems and it is a FACT that there are differing force interactions from the 4 off possible charge combinations and it is a FACT that + and - charges are NOT the same and it is a FACT that modern day science hasn’t a clue what CAUSED the Big Bang and it is a FACT that modern day science doesn’t know what consciousness is……..it is a FACT that the gravity theory presently has not provided a united theory…..all FACTS….
Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Nov, 2021 12:39 am
@Jasper10,
It is a FACT that electromechanical systems have a STILL part and a MOVING part……and it is a FACT that an EXTERNAL electrical input is required for the electromagnetic fields to be produced and for that electromechanical system to work.It is a FACT that the brain is full of on/off electrical signals.
0 Replies
 
htam9876
 
  1  
Reply Fri 19 Nov, 2021 02:24 am
Next, test again.
What’s the physical essence of time in physics / nature?

…………………………………..
(If someone doesn’t know what’s a virus, how can he “sure enough” virus has two mouths, +/-, +/-?)
 

Related Topics

New Propulsion, the "EM Drive" - Question by TomTomBinks
The Science Thread - Discussion by Wilso
Why do people deny evolution? - Question by JimmyJ
Are we alone in the universe? - Discussion by Jpsy
Fake Science Journals - Discussion by rosborne979
Controvertial "Proof" of Multiverse! - Discussion by littlek
 
  1. Forums
  2. » time travel paradox
  3. » Page 10
Copyright © 2022 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 01/16/2022 at 04:49:37