A New World Order: Thoughts and Perspectives

By now, many, if not most of you, have heard various politicians and media figures speak of a New World Order. What exactly does this mean? What kind of order is it that they speak of? Who is going to implement this New World Order? How will it be implemented? What types of people understand or subscribe to the New World Order? Will it be established by some dishonest Christian conspiracy theorists, con artists who are busy spitting out books on all sorts of theories with the assumption that they have a large audience filled with gullible and naive people ready to make them rich and famous? The real issues have never been clearly defined by those who speak out concerning a New World Order; the real issues are what is and who is this New World Order?

What the New World Order entails, among other things, are the many issues that would be considered taboo in today's day and age. However, like all great idealists, philosophers, and scientists,' proponents of the New World Order, namely The Illuminati Order, are pioneers in the field of human and social responsibility. We are providing practical and logical solutions to the many issues and questions authoritative figures in high positions would not dare speak of in public for fear of loosing their positions and/or their reputations.

To obtain a prominent standing in a political, academic, or private sector arena an individual has to be wise, deceptive, and/or secretive. The will to do whatever it takes to achieve success is crucial to their success. More importantly, to make real changes in the real world, an individual has to aspire toward being a nobleman, a politician, or a character of social standing. Attaining those levels of human recognition requires a willingness to endure long, hard, battles and a great deal of personal endurance.
The most important characteristic a person needs to achieve prominence in society today is the ability not to support 'socialized taboos' and to develop an ability for manipulating the masses. This requires a fine line in personal life maintenance and its presentation. Also, the need to ascertain which of the 'so called issues' can be presented and supported that will appeal to as large a number of naive and ignorant followers on all sides of issues' dividing lines is necessary. The goal oriented individual today has to find ways to please and not upset the Christian majority, the conservative masses, the liberal minded, the moderate thinkers, so on and so forth. The rationality that follows in a democratic state is that the naive masses believe they are voting for whom they think will serve as 'representatives' of their personal beliefs. This is their way to exercise power as citizens. While this is true in perfect terms, conditions are rarely perfect, and the average voter remains unsophisticated and naïve'. Media sometimes assists in this act of dumbing down, and keeping, voters in the dark-both consciously and without conscious.

Politicians often have connections to the media and corporations. They are enticed to propagate a fine line of rhetoric spoken of earlier in this article. Even with access to "stories, and interviews, on hot issues" if a corporate media vehicle won't sell market shares when demonstrating that topic of interest they may back burner the topic to avoid profit losses. So, it is not always in the media's best interest to upset the leading politicians, political parties, government agencies, or administrations too greatly. Total honesty and forthrightness in media is a rare commodity. Issue stances that stand against a corporation may loose out on advertising money that arrives mainly from those businesses and that can create havoc for media vehicles. We all know business owners, or business managers, who maintain viewpoints leaning toward one party, one politician, or another. It can become the interest of these news media corporations to be focussed toward their goals and lack certain honesty regarding anything else as a result. They become obligated by financial interests to put a spin on stories in order to please advertisers.

As far as politicians, we should review the 'representatives' people are told they are electing. These individuals win the vote because of their stance on issues. Oftentimes, these issues though are really non-issues made to seem important by those politicians themselves, with the assistance of media (albeit this can be blind assistance). One such issue is that of abortion.
Individuals who oppose abortion think they have the right to dictate to other citizens and/or individuals that they are forbidden to have abortions. They are tainted with an intellectual disease that has erupted from twisted doctrines or beliefs they maintain wherein abortion is murder. They, as God's servants, believe that they are responsible for everyone else who does not share their belief and attempt to tell them not to have abortions. They argue that it is immoral, but cannot place certain moral standards on the table. They do not have moral standards other than ones developed from their personal interpretation of a barbaric book written by savages over 1000s of years ago. So politicians, observing that they have a large group of people interested in enslaving one another to their personal beliefs, make an issue out of the non-issue that is truly a matter of personal choice that should be left to individuals. Or they avoid the topic altogether and refocus discussions to topics where the masses garner 100% of agreement.
A collection of cells, or the fetus, is not a voter who puts people and governments in power. The unborn child does not pay taxes; it does not send non-existent children to the front lines in a battle, etc. The more logical issues remain far from the mindsets of what we view as barbaric and weak-minded bafoons, when serious issues are spearheaded through diversion tactics such as this. As just one example of how justice is perverted with the help of politicians and the media (abortion although it is legalized and allowable at present, within the United States, remains argued in every election campaign and it is truly a non-argument).

The founding fathers of the United States, along with the signatures of the Declaration of Independence, and U.S. Constitution, knew that religion could be construed in an evil manner so they amended the U.S. Constitution ensuring that the religious extremists, the bigots, and the con-artists (poised as true politicians) would not trample INDIVIDUAL freedoms. The US Constitution, although it has a few flaws and loopholes, is still a very good secular document put forth by men who were "enlightened" in their era. Some of the signers were members of the Masonic and the Illuminati Orders. If they had not been, the U.S. Constitution might very well have appeared to be a Christian doctrinal document.

Being wise in knowledge on how to manipulate the masses and supplement religious leaders, thereby quieting their rhetoric, the founding fathers were able to pass a perfectly secular document designed to ensure liberties of the INDIVIDUAL, not the "public," were followed. There is no such a thing as "the public" or "the people." People cannot have any rights nor can society. Those are generic terms created by altruists to deceive the very individuals that are to vote for them.

What the unlearned and naive voters may fail to realize, once politicians win an election, is that they have authority to pass laws on countless issues that were never brought to light during the campaign. Most of the time, these are laws the very people who voted on them may oppose. Have you ever observed a 'representative' ask the people who voted for him or her what their views are on issues they are about to pass laws on? In some ways their not doing so is a good thing because most people are uninformed on most of issues most of the time. The average person does not think it is important to study philosophy, to value education, so on and so forth. Real education that helps a person mature in their knowledge and wisdom does not come from a college, university degree, or a diploma. Real education comes from reading many books on diverse issues, especially philosophical accounts that are the science of reasoning.

Just as there is no school that will teach young adults class work to rear their children, there are no schools that teach people to use their most important tool, reason. There are many schools that teach people what to think but not how to think. To learn how to think, one needs to be able to reason. To be able to reason, one has to obtain the knowledge that is to be found in philosophies. Once one has obtained knowledge, one is armed with a vast array of ideas and concepts to live a fruitous life. Having gained the treasure of philosophical and wise advancement one is then able to analyze and improve what others have created before them. They then can innovatively borrow and ultimately build upon, even develop, new ideas and ideals.

The average person, however, does not think it's important to gain higher knowledge. The result of this is that we have a multitude of individuals that have children they are ill equipped to rear successfully. They do so without minds powerful enough to be able to deal with child guidance and direction toward any given direction. Religious believers, for example, believe they have all the truth in life that they will ever need; and that all they need do is make sure they brainwash their children with the same religious beliefs they have learned so they will all make it to heaven.

The ignorant masses in society want to have a good time in life. They want to live as best as they can and not care about their actions or the effect they have on others. Therefore, the community and future of their children, and their children's children, weighs in the balance. What does an individual such as that care if someone might be sleeping at 2 a.m. when he or she rides with their car radio blasting vibrating all the windows in the neighborhood? Or, what does he or she care if they make the streets look dirty by throwing garbage out the window or onto the sidewalks, etc.? What does he or she care about beauty, respect, honor, and responsibility?

Then there are seculars (e.g., atheists, socialists, communists, anarchists, so on and so forth). All of them with their own ideals. All of them worship products created of their own whims. All of them maintain whatever emotions make them feel good as the right thing for them to do. The future, to them, is not important. They want to feel important in life as much as possible. That is all that matters to them. They find a community of like-minded people and they seek comfort in belonging to it. The result of such fellowship is the heightened notion of being amongst the right people, with the right philosophy, and the best ideas to solve everyone else's problems.
Every individual seems infected with a need to stick their nose in someone else's business and dictate to others. Every time they convince another poor moron to embrace their version of the truth they get an ego boost and the process repeats itself.

Throughout the ages, however, a seed of enlightenment has been planted and nourished by what most people refer to as radicals. A new philosophy took hold and matured over the centuries. It has been safeguarded by various secret societies such as Freemasonry, The Illuminati, and other similar organizations. This philosophy is the philosophy of realism, of practical application to problems that face mankind. This philosophy is known as Objectivism. Although it has been hijacked by Randists (people who claim and believe that Ayn Rand was the inventor or originator of this philosophy) it is only the ignorant and poorly educated in the field of philosophy and literature that prescribe to such belief. Unfortunately, this is the case with most Objectivists. There are two types of people who claim Rand as the originator or founder of Objectivism.
Objectivism is a collection of original thoughts of many individuals over the centuries. People who have books to sell and big salaries to maintain (objectivistcenter.org: parasites and aynrand.org: parasites) are the idiots, liars, cowards, and deceivers who still maintain that objectivism was founded or originated by Ayn Rand. Those dumb enough to believe such nonsense should read John Adams, Thomas Jefferson and other founding fathers, Pope, Cicero, Branden, Nietzsche, Aristotle, and a multitude of other authors and philosophers; there are too many to list here.

The irony is, most Objectivists are poorly educated, and very poorly learned in philosophical or historical biographies of influential personages throughout the ages. Objectivism by its very nature believes that in order to be understood one needs to be familiar with the other philosophies. Re-educate yourself if you are one of them. The honest Randist must ask him or her self-the question, "How is it that none of those so called scholars of Objectivism dare to put forth a well written treaties on Objective Law?" Their answer is simple, "It would be taboo and they would loose their ignorant audience of dumb sheep and no longer be able to maintain well paid salaries paid for by their NOT-FOR PROFIT organizations." The very fact that those cowards hide behind non-profit organizations to pay their salaries should be enough of a warning signal by itself.

Objectivism recognizes Capitalism as the natural political philosophy amongst men yet here they are the new champions of Objectivism running non-profit organizations that help them pay themselves bigger salaries as their organizations pay no taxes. Objectivism opposes parasitism, yet here are champions of Objectivism expecting others to pay their share of taxes that also pay for their protection, their organization's protection, their roads, their fire departments, their armies, their police, their city water, and other public services.

One of the reasons Rand denounced Branden was he tried to show her what great errors she was making. Nathaniel was a witness of Rand getting burned out. She sought a quick way out of the situation that she started and Branden tried to correct her. She became a victim of her own ego and made mistakes. Her view on the status of women and lack of understanding of art (see contradictions between The Fountainhead and The Romantic Manifesto) are her most obvious and direct contradictory works. Her position on the status of women in society in relation to men is a disaster at best.

The problem with the various Objectivism organizations is they preach dogmatic versions of Objectivism that provide the Objectivist with a bad name and reputation. They also preach that Objectivism is a closed system and it is not. Objectivism, true Objectivism, is Practical Objectivism. This is where we part company with all so-called Objectivists. It is important to note that while the Objectivism philosophy is the very best product of the human mind derived through the application of logic and reason--it is also very much ahead of its time. The reason for this is that many problems and garbage the enlightened are burdened with, they are left to clean up, and this overwhelms the best minds. The destroyers of the world, the communists, the religious, the socialists, and altruists have filled the earth with so many problems to overcome it is simply not possible to implement Objective Law at this point in time. Objectivism, by its very nature, demands that people who embrace it, and understand it, be not only educated but also RESPONSIBLE. The perfection of mankind and advancement of knowledge along with technology through sciences is the goal of any sane and intelligent person.

Without such citizens, the troubles facing the world cannot be resolved, and the reality on the ground is most citizens of the planet are savages, engulfed in mysticism, and barbaric ideologies. Their purposes and goals are not happiness and tranquility on earth, but some fairytale rewards in afterlife with tyrants who seek, grab, and maintain power over the others at all costs.
There are socialists, also known as social-democrats, who believe that all problems of the earth can be solved through enslaving everyone who is an achiever and forcing them to pay more and more taxes so they can provide hard earned money to other savages. They are to subsidize the incompetent and lazy.
What does this have to do with a New World Order? And, what is the New World Order? Let's attempt to present an idea of what is meant by a New World Order, or a One World Order now that we have outlined some concerns and problems facing civilization.

The Goals and Purposes of the New World Order are:
1. To bring about a global climate where each individual can be and will be a Perfectibilist in whatever field her or his natural tendency (or gift nature) leans toward. In other words, a world where individuals can earn a good and very comfortable living, honestly, through being honest to self. To achieve happiness and as much perfection as possible. This requires an environment where a person should not have to choose a field that he or she is not inclined towards just to make a living. Personal happiness begins with individual liberty. Liberty is dependent on individuals who are responsible in every sense of the word. Individuals who long for and seek personal satisfaction and pleasure in the quality of life humans can achieve are entitled to do so.

2. To enlighten the world in small, but certain steps, through the spread of democracy (at first) so that all people worldwide can taste and become indoctrinated with the intoxication of individual liberty without fear of retribution from those in power is tantamount. Various parts of the earth must be placed in the hands of leaders capable of establishing and maintaining a reasonable form of democracy for an extended period of time until the old generation of barbaric mentalities are gone. Then the newer generations will be conditioned with the knowledge and experience of liberty that will then take over ruling bodies.

3. To provide protection for our beloved planet, to ensure we transform the world into a society of individuals who desire to be part of a people who take personal responsibility to leave the planet a better place than previous generations is necessary. In other words, enlightenment of the masses, in as much as possible, so they find it a welcoming and pleasant thought to become earth conscious is necessary. The knowledge that being responsible for our actions can become a pleasure instead of a burden.

4. To advance science and education as the most supreme and noble traits to attain in civilization. Only possible through the tools nature blessed us with, (i.e.: our minds, our reason, our logic, and our senses).

5. To seek to advance space science and to move life beyond our mother planet. To develop and colonize other planets, solar systems, and the Universe.

6. To provide a structure of government that will be led by Perfectibilists. Where individuals that are elected will be highly intelligent BUT will not find it necessary to hide behind false personalities in fear of retribution by the voting classes or due to personal matters that should never be taken in consideration when electing public officials. To create a climate wherein honor, respect, and other like-minded attributes are deemed consistent of a person of worth, and to do so without ridicule or jest. To achieve a world climate where leaders seek positions of status because they are honorable. Where they achieve out of honor and not because it is where the power lies.

7. To establish educational systems where personal discipline is the highest priority taught to children. Where achievement, no matter how small, is rewarded, so children and future generations aspire to become Perfectibilists in all or as many areas of life, as much as is humanly possible.

8. To do away with the ancient and barbaric teachings that create divisions, hatred, and envy (i.e., tribalism, religions, mysticism, and nationalism) which exist as the seeds of evil, terror, and even threaten the very existence of civilization as we know it at the present time.

9. To establish a world where achievers will not be punished, nor envied, for their achievements. Where those who earn a living are not deprived of it by force or coercion, or through having to give it to others who did not earn it. A world where pure capitalism is the absolute law of the land and it is the only proper political philosophy among civilization. Where self interest is a noble positive to achieve. Everything anyone does is generally for purely selfish interests. This is one of the core laws of human nature. So, to teach that selfishness is evil, is to deny the most important truth of the reality of nature itself, to teach that selfishness is wrong, is a devious cancer that now eats away at our population worldwide. No human being should be forced to, or coerced, to provide for the well being of another. A person's economic responsibility is to herself or himself and to themselves alone.
Children are to be the direct property of the parent(s) until they can undertake self-responsibility to provide for self. They are also included in the personal responsibility. To raise a child properly is of far greater importance than leading a nation properly. Nations can be corrected, children cannot. The damage done due to improper upbringing is permanent.

10. To establish and teach objective law as the only proper legal system for all mankind.
All of these comprise the body of the doctrine of the New World order and more importantly the One World order. These are very achievable. To arrive at these goals we have a long way to go. For this reason, we need to recruit as many intelligent persons and individuals willing to embrace our principles, so that we can wield a greater powerbase to speed up this process. To make certain we leave behind a generation of Illuminati who will carry on the struggle for the perfection of mankind.
We also hope that scientists will release a virus to render all male humans infertile, so we can put a halt to the explosion of population that is the greatest most immediate threat to humanity above all else. The time will come when only persons who are able to afford to have children through artificial insemination/cloning and similar techniques will be able to do so. This is simply because today the parasites of the world are the ones who are multiplying like rabbits. It is these parasites which the United Nations, bleeding heart liberals, and socialists want to feed and keep alive so they keep on multiplying. Such are the scientists who are perfecting the science of poverty by creating poverty.

On Poverty

The sole cause of poverty is the inflation of the human population. When people multiply faster than wealth can be created the end result will always be poverty. Furthermore, the planet cannot sustain billions of people for an extended period of time. We will run out of resources far sooner than we can advance the resources of other planets and extra-planetary bodies. If we continue to inflate at the current rate, future generations will be digging in garbage dumps as if they are gold mines. When they run out of garbage to mine, future generations will have nothing left at all and that will be the end of civilization, of our hard work, and of the achievements of all the enlightened minds of past generations of life.
All the hard work and toil we have exerted will have been for nothing. Every time a poor person has a child she or he has given birth to new poverty, pure and simple. The welfare system must be eliminated at all cost. This seems directly opposed to the ideals of individual liberty, however, liberty without responsibility is anarchy and chaos. So, until such time when we have a society worthy of liberty, capable and willing to be responsible for their actions and well being, if responsibility is ignored it will have to be imposed. Liberty is not for the animals or the savages as such will just trample it under foot.
Such is the true nature of the New World Order. It is the doctrine that will lead to a One-World Order once and for all.

Sincerely,

Max