@ogden,
ogden wrote:Boagie, greetings,
If a small child who does not comprehend death is afraid, what are they afraid of?
If fear is a response to a condition, real or imaginedand, the causality of the response is not neccissarily a second order thought, i.e. fear of death. Admitedly the fear response, inherent in our nature, is for self preservation (death avoidance), IMHO it would be a tautology to say all fear is fear of death, even if the primary function of the fear response is to prolong life.
Given that the first order knee jerk reaction; fight or flight, is designed to avoid death, it would seem rational that there are other (second order) less severe negative outcomes that could cause fear.
On a personal note, I value death greatly. Even though I avoid it with robust fervor, I am promised death, no one can take it from me, it is what makes life sooo sweet;).
ogden,
:)You make some excellent points my friend, the young may feel somewhat immortal on a conscious level, but this thing is a part of the very fabric of being, different things may be life threating at that age, abandonment is number one on the list. Indifference to on the part of the parent is also a form of abandonment, too a dependent, this is a mortal threat. You might have something here, for the natural response of fight or flight seems a futile response to the condition of abandonment.
:)What is this thing you would term the causality of response and what do you mean by saying fight or flight is a secondary thought, or am I misunderstanding you? Fight or flight are instinctual responses and cannot really be considered a common thought process, they are if anything something of the first order, there is no time for abstract thoughts ect.., here, when danger is immediate, so too must the respones be immediate.
:)As far as this premise being a tautology goes, no, it is not, as I have stated that I do not believe it is absolute but something that deserves consideration.
:)Your theory that there should be a second order responses to things of a lesser threat, I could not agree more, that was point of useing the flame of the fire as an analogy, to make people appreciate these things are related and simply hard to precieve when on a scale of diminishing degrees. If one forcees the possiability of being injured, it certainly is a different proposition than faceing certain death, but, it is all in degrees. Here the degrees are striking but across the board they become less pronounced, less distinctive and so enstranged you might say from the mother concept of survival and fear of death.
:)Your praise of death is well founded, without death, this would be a very real hell.