@manored,
manored wrote:I actually wanted to mean greater or different enough from us to not understand us, just expressed myself badly
What if he was uncapable of, for example, understanding our language, just like we know ants communicate trading smells even thought we cant understand what they are saying and not even fell those smells?
Well, then it would make sense to define the word
god. Although that would be next to impossible, I've seen the definition fall into a couple main categories. One looks at god as a humanoid creature who created us in turn. The other espouses this ethereal nexus-like energy...very difficult to pin down.
But, if it is the latter, then I don't see the point in even talking about it, much less mentally masturbating over it. Now, if it is some being having an identifiable appearance/motivation, then why would we assume it is too stupid to understand written language?
I think one's intermediate goal would be to decide how one defines god before one assigns a value or merit to it. It's too easy to bounce back and forth between one's own doubts, like a tennis ball. In that case, one may find that it would be time to get serious about one's position, maybe.