@edgarblythe,
Because Ed, the inabilty to disprove the notion of a god opens up the door for the exercise of rhetorical devices which then are in competition with other rhetorical devices for the approval of the public whose members have a free choice.
The size of the segment of the population which approves the rhetoric in favour of the notion of a god/s compared with the size of the segment of the population which approves the rhetoric in favour of the notion of "without god", both now and historically, is such that the former holds considerable sway (about 9 to1 I gather in the US) and in a democracy the former is justified as the rhetoric on which to proceed in the matter of social organisation.
Hence my posts concerning the avoidance of rhetoricians in the service of being "without god" in social affairs.
It is a self-comforting straw man that the 90% are ignorant, superstitious fools being led by the nose by unscrupulous weavers of the wind. The onus is on the rhetoricians of the notion of "no god" to up their game which, of course, they have no chance of doing as is easily seen on this very thread and anywhere else one might care to look.
Your tunes are hopeless and consist of little else but snarlings and materialistic simplicities.
All the other "billions" of things you mention do not lend themselves to these considerations.