you seem to fail in addressing the subject. As was said in the entire history of these threads.There is NO evidence that any of the amides amines imides quinones, or nucleotides even existed at the time life was initiated on earth(around 3.9 Billion yars ago).This is a basis of a"preprotein" metabolism first world.
We have ample evidence of simple life (all C12 based, around 3.9 BY , an maybe erlier by evidence in localied deposits) We really dont know how life initiated but its not thought that the RNA "world" was an exclusive but a progressive process in that theres no clear evience of purines and pyrimidines not until at last a hallf billion years or more after life actually began.(This is based on occurence of stromatolites and the beginning of oxygenation)
We know that from structures and layers of organic polymers that comprise a cell all life just maybe had to wait a half billion years until it actually began "bookkeeping" . I know that youre entire worldview is based on a theistic source, but science has gone past what chemical kick started it and is considering several different reasonable models. I ussed to be an RNA firster but more dta on the pucity or the purines ond pyrimidines begn some metier debates among my more deeply involved collegues .
The "Metabolism First" hypothesis is based upon work at Cold Harbor and byseveral experiments in the formation of cell membrane polymers in an early arth atmosphere by J Dworkin. Bernstein and Sanford did several expeiments that displayed that , undercondition of early atmosphere, most PAH and polymers displayed chirality (they form helixes and double helixes.
Such habit of chemicals were found also in the Merchesoon mteorite which contains several PAHs and glycine and Thymine.
A "partial" pnspermia is also a possibile candidate.
As for evolution (a totally separate subject)
You seem to want to press an ID worldview. That involves the selective search for evidence to support your pre selected beliefs. Here , the combined sciences of biology, paleontology, geology, mineralogy(Bob Hazens analyses of the "evolution "of complex chemicals in the Hadean Earth) dont collectivelysupport you (Unless of course you believe that the entire system that defines our universe i under detailed control by your intelligent being, then I suppose weve got waay more work to do to even come up with xplantions that deserve consideration of an ID world.