10 Ways to Stop Corporate Dominance of Politics

5. Ban political advertising by corporations that receive government money, hire lobbyists, or collect most of their revenue abroad. A fear that many observers have noted is that the Court’s ruling will allow foreign corporations to influence U.S. elections. According to The New York Times, Sen. Charles Schumer (D-New York) and Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Maryland) are exploring this option.

U know, Amigo, if u consider the matter deeply
I'm sure that u will agree that ONLY corporations shoud have the vote in elections,
but I don 't mean just ANY, ordinary corporations; I mean the good ones with upward of,
shall we say, $10,000,000 capitalization
because thay have the cash to invest to figure out what will be
the best policies to put into operation for the benefit of other
corporate persons, plus their boards of directors, their shareholders
and for the public. Thay can best decide what will bring about
the most happiness.

Additionally, in the spirit of = protection of the laws,
I am sure that u will agree, Amigo, that if a corporation
is not doing well financially, like GM losing $$, it shoud get
continual welfare payments, grants not loans like Obama gave them b4,
and in the spirit of equality, corporations shoud not only be the only
people who can vote, but thay shoud ALSO be the only members of society
who are eligible to run for political office.

I know that we can rely upon U, Amigo to propagate this
newfound American political theory.

By the way, Amigo, do u mind revealing where u were born ?

OK, Amigo, I love your posting: always an inspiration.
We all look forward to your leadership in the concepts set forth hereinabove!
Make us proud of u, AmigO!

(Either that, or take another pill.)

Watch this david. This is what your corporations think of America. This is what happens when you make a CEO vice president.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QeIxHQ-lkuM

Our soldiers are FUCKEN TRASH compaired to profit. THE ENEMY COULD NOT DO TO OUR SOLDIERS WHAT HALIBURTON DID TO THEM.

They were paid for their services VERY liberally with OUR tax money. Why didn't they deliver to our soldiers in the war against Islam. They sold us the war like it was for God and country. Why did they poison our soldiers with contaminated water we paid them to treat?Profit before EVERYTHING....God, country, ideals, people, honor, air, water, the enviroment .

Who is the enemy?

As we know david, you have already commited yourself. What exactly are you loyal to?You can not answer my questions without contraditing yourself. I am always right. Being right is simply a choice. ANYBODY CAN DO IT.

I watched it. I don t know whether to BELIEVE that guy; I don 't know his motivations.
He might be telling the truth, or he might be a socialist liar.
I don 't have enuf information to judge that.

The accusation is that in 63 out of some larger
number of water storage tanks, there was no chlorine,
if I understand his allegations accurately. If so, the missing chlorine
was worth only a few pennies; hence, if this claim is true,
it is obviously not for "profit" as u claim, but just that some guy screwed up.
Negligence n stupidity, not malice nor any "profit" motive.
I wonder whether the Marine Corps has heard of this.
It wants its troops to be in good health.


Haliburton did not sell us the war. People like me, who DID advocate the war,
did so out of justified fear of a homicidal maniac with a grudge against us and possible access to nukes.
I don 't advocate continuing the war, unless it is necessary
to protect our access to oil.




Negligence; some guy screwed up. I imagine that if Haliburton found out about it,
thay 'd have disciplined whoever failed to put in the chlorine.
He did not do what Haliburton paid him to do.


WHAT PROFIT ?
How many pennies can be saved by failing to put in chlorine ?



I think probably u r, Amigo, but not in your own mind. U r a fanatical anti-capitalist.
I support laissez faire free enterprize.



Well, at the moment, loyal to having a little fun by tormenting a socialist (meaning u).
I was trolling u, when I wrote the post to which u responded.
I 'm not very good at that; I can t keep up the joke too long.





I don 't believe that 's true,
tho admittedly: I don 't have the answer to every question.




Yeah, the guy who takes retardation pills, always right, sure, have another one.




Yeah, like when Hitler invaded Russia. It was not right for HIM, but it was right for ME.

Then how bout this one??

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6cJlJudDtVE&feature=channel