Reply
Thu 21 Jan, 2010 07:25 am
and it's just my theory so feel free to flame it , ridicule it, agree with it or stick it somewhere.
bush and his boss cheney fucked up the country so badly that people would have voted for anyone and no repub could have carried the 2008 election. Obama had the best story and was the best speaker and people desperately needed to believe in something so they contracted with Obama but the deal breaker was this...we want radical change WE CAN SEE RIGHT AWAY!!!! I think the underlying and perhaps even unspoken tone of Obama's message was that he would bring that immediate change, which, given the shape the country was brought to by cheney/bush was an impossible promise to keep and a foolish one to make even if merely by implication.
I think that when the inevitable happened.... immediate radical change has not come about, the people have snapped. They've had enough and think rightly or not , that Obama is just another talking head and certainly Congress and the Senate have left no doubt in people's minds about that.
Add the fact that rightly or not, the perception is that Obama just lets one or two Senate or Congress members derail his plans and never shows any spine when it's still fresh in their minds that cheney/bush forced the Hill to do their bidding through a gigantic show of brass balls, they know a president CAN force his agenda on the congress and senate but Obama is perceived to let them thumb their nose at him.
So, something like Massachusetts happens, the repubs probably WILL make Massive gains in the House and Senate in 2010 ubless something politically miraculous happens, and the staus quo will remain in effect and the regular American public will be more and more fucked because if people are pissed at the dems they vote for the repubs and vice versa, therefore nothing really changes.
I think people should have to pass a test proving they've paid attention and have at least a basic knowledge of how government works and what's going on in the world in order to gain the right to vote. I pay a lot of attention to the news and politics and probably would have a hard time passing that test and I pay WAY more attention than the average citizen. We have the government we've allowed and therefore the one we deserve.
I realize the constitution says everyone can vote no matter how stupid, ignorant or uniformed they are. so let's amend it. God knows there hasn't seemed to be a problem ******* around with the Constitution just lately.
@blueveinedthrobber,
blueveinedthrobber wrote:We have the government we've allowed and therefore the one we deserve.
always remember
no matter who you vote for, the government always wins
and armed with that knowledge people vote for the person who's story most closely matches their own becuasei'ts the only real option.
Just lube up and stay lubed and at least getting fucked won't be quite so uncomfortable.
@blueveinedthrobber,
my summation of the last and next election
presidential election, ooooh, free stuff, where do i sign up
mid term elections, ooooh, we're going to fight socialism on the home front, where do i sign up
@blueveinedthrobber,
Quote:I think people should have to pass a test proving they've paid attention and have at least a basic knowledge of how government works and what's going on in the world in order to gain the right to vote. I pay a lot of attention to the news and politics and probably would have a hard time passing that test and I pay WAY more attention than the average citizen. We have the government we've allowed and therefore the one we deserve.
Who is going to administer the test, the government? It reminds me of Bush telling school systems their whole educational process would be wrapped up in taking the one test. Or, the next step would deciding who's fit to have children, even though I truly believe stupid people shouldn't breed, it's their right to do so. Same goes with stupid people voting.
we could get an objective panel of experts on US government from a bi-partisan group of foreign governments to write the test but then it would be too complicated for Americans to understand :0)
@blueveinedthrobber,
Quote:we could get an objective panel of experts on US government from a bi-partisan group of foreign governments to write the test but then it would be too complicated for Americans to understand :0)
Which ultimately means they've done their job.
@blueveinedthrobber,
blueveinedthrobber wrote:
we could get an objective panel of experts on US government from a bi-partisan group of foreign governments to write the test but then it would be too complicated for Americans to understand :0)
Sounds like an object panel of experts on global warming.
@roger,
roger wrote:
blueveinedthrobber wrote:
we could get an objective panel of experts on US government from a bi-partisan group of foreign governments to write the test but then it would be too complicated for Americans to understand :0)
Sounds like an object panel of experts on global warming.
They just have the wrong spokespeople. If Randy Jackosn and Simon Cowell told America that we were about to destroy the Earth through global warmng and carbon emissions within a week the whole freakin' country would look like noone but the Almish lived here. Except for tv's of course. We'd still have those. You never know if the pants on the ground man is going to be back on.